Dragon Age was suppose to be the spiritual successor to BG. BG had all those many of the points I spoke of. Bioware set itself up for this comparison by saying DAO would be the spiritual successor to BG. IMHO, DAI actually is closer to being the spiritual successor than DAO.
OF course, but when you hype it that way expect the comparison. Some of us were here when the design specifications for DAO came out. There was quite an uproar. Now in hindsight some posters see it as the pinnacle of cRPGs. Sorry that for me was Baldur's Gate 1 and Baldur's Gate 2. For me DAI is close to BG1 in design. That is why I like it more than DAO.
See, i dont understand where youre coming from.. In some posts you state how youre perfectly ok, and prefer even what is in DAI.. The next you claim how you like everything about old school crpgs.. But then directly contradict those statements when you say things like DAI being the closest thing to BG, or that certain aspects of it are better.. This game has no reminiscence of anything crpg... Nothing.. Its fully, 100% button mashing, action hack n slash... With some conversations on the side.. Nothing more! DAO was in fact the only one that felt, and played like an old school game! Even had engaging conversation, and far more Depth than either of the following two.