The Last Hope of Tevinter - Calpernia fan and discussion thread
#126
Posté 05 février 2015 - 07:43
#127
Posté 05 février 2015 - 09:11
Calpernia was a better antagonist than Samson.
- themageguy et Vaseldwa aiment ceci
#128
Posté 05 février 2015 - 10:35
I could see DA4 following the trend of allowing you to appoint a new ruler. DA:O had fereldan throne and DA:I had the divine and emperor choice. So I can see a event taking place where we can make a choice on who is Archon and possible choosing between Calpernia, Dorian, and maybe current archon.
ew
ew ew ew ew ew ew ew
#129
Posté 05 février 2015 - 11:40
ew
ew ew ew ew ew ew ew
Yup.
#130
Posté 05 février 2015 - 11:46
I could see DA4 following the trend of allowing you to appoint a new ruler. DA:O had fereldan throne and DA:I had the divine and emperor choice. So I can see a event taking place where we can make a choice on who is Archon and possible choosing between Calpernia, Dorian, and maybe current archon.
I would hope not, especially if they set it up where you're disadvantaging if not outright condemning whoever you don't choose. I really don't want Dorian to be involved with that viper nest at all. I appreciate that he cares so much, but frankly, I wish he'd just wash his hands of the whole country.
- HurraFTP et Lord Bolton aiment ceci
#131
Posté 05 février 2015 - 11:48
I would hope not, especially if they set it up where you're disadvantaging if not outright condemning whoever you don't choose. I really don't want Dorian to be involved with that viper nest at all. I appreciate that he cares so much, but frankly, I wish he'd just wash his hands of the whole country.
also more importantly THE PLAYER BEING ABLE TO MAKE THESE HUGE DECISIONS IS RIDICULOUS
#132
Posté 06 février 2015 - 12:25
I would hope not, especially if they set it up where you're disadvantaging if not outright condemning whoever you don't choose. I really don't want Dorian to be involved with that viper nest at all. I appreciate that he cares so much, but frankly, I wish he'd just wash his hands of the whole country.
That's a little selfish, no? ![]()
At any rate, if such a thing were to happen I'd rather it be the result of the player's actions (similar to the Divine election, but better done) rather than everyone just turning to the player and asking them what they think should be done (like the Landsmeet).
It's one thing to be a Grey Warden in a country with a decimated political system during a blight. Short of Tevinter being hobbled by a slave uprising + a qunari attack + the dwarves withholding lyrium for some reason, I don't see the Magisterium being desperate enough to go with a fait accompli like that.
#133
Posté 06 février 2015 - 02:06
Same. I still really liked her as character, probably one of my favourite Bioware antagonists. Though, I saw it more as self-righteousness than hypocrisy, but maybe I'm just unaware of any slavery/corruption at her hand. I might agree with her goals and ideals, but not so much methods.I found it hypocritical of her to have a goal of ending what makes Tevinter bad and yet has no problem doing those things.
Let's just hope there's no Reign of Terror-esque "reform"Calpernia was the leader of the Venatori. The very people responsible for attempting to (and in some cases suceeding) to assassinate the Empress of Orlais, making a thrall of the King of Nevarra, attempting to assassinate the Monarch of Ferelden and burn down the capital. I doubt many foreign rulers would be eager at the idea of an alliance with an Imperial she rules.
And while I agree with time running out and reform is needed, the type of reform Calpernia wants to implicate and so impatiently, so rapidly such as the removal of slavery would realistically be far more crippling to Tevinter and its economy that Magister Infighting. Tbh I'd only support Calpernia if I wanted to advocate Qunari interests as it stands currently.
As for the confrontation at the Well of Sorrows, if people went with fighting her, resulting in her supposed suicide, I remember someone pointing out the she wasn't so much a pushover like Samson. Much more prideful, didn't want to be defeated. Someone else saw it as her refusing to lose and submit, because those are the very things she hates, her being a former slave. I found those were two interesting interpretations, and heck, both might even have a point. Kudos to her writer, because she does have an interesting personality, and here's to hoping she'd show up in the next game.
#134
Posté 06 février 2015 - 07:28
also more importantly THE PLAYER BEING ABLE TO MAKE THESE HUGE DECISIONS IS RIDICULOUS
I think it was handled nicely in DAI. You don't actually decide who's going to rule Orlais. You manipulate events and present selective evidence so things fall out a certain way.
The difficulty for a writer is setting up a situation where you can plausibly do that. Again, I think it was done well in DAI. In a Tevinter scenario, it could be something like "You choose to support X in a critical mission that results in their victory later on". There are many points in a sequence of events where you can justify a large-scale divergence based on one person's actions.
#135
Posté 06 février 2015 - 07:42
Calpernia was a better antagonist than Samson.
#136
Posté 06 février 2015 - 02:48
I think it was handled nicely in DAI. You don't actually decide who's going to rule Orlais. You manipulate events and present selective evidence so things fall out a certain way.
The difficulty for a writer is setting up a situation where you can plausibly do that. Again, I think it was done well in DAI. In a Tevinter scenario, it could be something like "You choose to support X in a critical mission that results in their victory later on". There are many points in a sequence of events where you can justify a large-scale divergence based on one person's actions.
It was a bit better in Inquisition - at least, the Divine choice was. The choice of who rules Orlais was a more typical BioWare "this is my choice and what I say automatically goes" thing.
#137
Posté 06 février 2015 - 03:17
It was a bit better in Inquisition - at least, the Divine choice was. The choice of who rules Orlais was a more typical BioWare "this is my choice and what I say automatically goes" thing.
Sort of... depending on what you did or didn't do during the ball you would or wouldn't have some of the options available. So although you do get a point where you sort of decided, in reality the things you did or didn't do previously set-up the situation in the first place. Which is more realistic than if people just were all "ok you pick who rules".
#138
Posté 06 février 2015 - 08:19
#139
Posté 06 février 2015 - 08:42
#140
Posté 06 février 2015 - 09:02
So a question, has anyone ever talked Calpernia down and then told her that you weren't going to let her go? I'm curious as to what happens in that scenario as I've never tried it and don't have any saves I could use to check (also don't think I could bring myself to do it).
Tried it. I told her the truth then told her I couldnt let her go she is the vent leader after all. This results in the same fight scene with her falling off the cliff. I reloaded though and let her go in my canon.
#141
Posté 07 février 2015 - 12:22
Tried it. I told her the truth then told her I couldnt let her go she is the vent leader after all. This results in the same fight scene with her falling off the cliff. I reloaded though and let her go in my canon.
One does wonder...."vent leader"?
I do hope she produces more significant effects as a leader than a lot of hot air.
- Lord Bolton aime ceci
#142
Posté 07 février 2015 - 12:33
- Ieldra et Rundy Bundles aiment ceci
#143
Posté 07 février 2015 - 01:32
Tried it. I told her the truth then told her I couldnt let her go she is the vent leader after all. This results in the same fight scene with her falling off the cliff. I reloaded though and let her go in my canon.
I...might do this next time. Just finished Wicked Eyes & WH, so I just...may. ;-;
#144
Posté 07 février 2015 - 02:30
So a question, has anyone ever talked Calpernia down and then told her that you weren't going to let her go? I'm curious as to what happens in that scenario as I've never tried it and don't have any saves I could use to check (also don't think I could bring myself to do it).
You tell here "You know the truth of Corypheus' betrayal. You will die knowing it."
Then you defeat her and she (supposedly) kills herself.
#145
Posté 07 février 2015 - 07:35
I don't know. I'm always cautious about doing the "Chose who rules" thing because I admit half the time I have no idea what I'm doing with those things.
I'm a little curious on who voiced Calpernia though. I can't find that information anywheres.
#146
Posté 07 février 2015 - 07:54
#147
Posté 07 février 2015 - 08:05
Half of the Magisterium was funding that blight monster.
Corpyheus fits right in with Tevinter.
#148
Posté 07 février 2015 - 08:11
Half of the Magisterium was funding that blight monster.
Corpyheus fits right in with Tevinter.
Lies, all lies. No Magister would share power nor bend knee to Corypheus. Some outcast just had high hopes.
#149
Posté 07 février 2015 - 08:20
@Ukki:
You do know that your statement sounds like typical Imperial propaganda... Why would that be? Oh yes, because it *is* typical Imperial propaganda.
#150
Posté 07 février 2015 - 08:29
I'm a little curious on who voiced Calpernia though. I can't find that information anywheres.
I've just spent 20 minutes on net research and came up with nothing. This is annoying. She's probably subsumed under "additional voices".





Retour en haut





