I am fairly sure that most of us understands that addiction is different for everyone, I'll take that as you painting most of us here as naive, your comment is well meant but a little insulting. But the narrative definitely tries to paint Samson as weak (and in DA2 as a coward.) You only have to see some of the more colorful expressions about Samson from certain people in this very thread to see how it worked.
I don't think anyone is directly comparing Cullen and Samson, The parallels that are being drawn is to how they are viewed after experiencing the same fate (that of begging on the street) Samson is loathed for what Cullen is pitied for. It's understandable given that yes, Cullen is the 'good guy' and Samson is the 'bad guy' but it speaks to me of how little compassion people have for others who aren't the 'right kind of addict' - its a very notion the Victorians tried to paint with their attitude towards the poor - there were the 'deserving poor' and those who weren't the 'right kind of poor' - it lacks the grace of true empathy. True empathy does not have conditions attached.
For me, who is currently doing Cullen's romance there are parts of Cullen’s story I feel are glossed over to make him palatable as a LI, and as a mage in this pt I think they missed an opportunity to focus on a true redemptive arc for him, they handled some aspects well but there is a little too much focus on his manpain at the expense of my player agency in parts (IMO). If there had been some great make or break moments, like there had been for some of the other romances it could have certainly lifted it into the awesome category for me instead of the feeling I currently have which is along the lines of 'oh this is really nice' . It was a last minute insertion into the game – and you can see it, if you look beyond the fluff. I think they did well with what they could, that's obvious purely for the popularity of his romance I guess. However, I would have liked a little more thought put into it and without leaving me feeling that I couldn't respond to things I disagreed with.
I'm confused by your last paragraph, in your first you state no path for addiction is the same, yet here you seem to be suggesting the opposite, that his path as an addict should have been what? The same as Cullen's if he stays on lyrium? That because he remained an addict he should have also remained a Kirkwall beggar? Different people, different circumstances, different outcomes.
Apologies, it was not meant to be insulting, just a feeling I got reading the thread that people are comparing the two. It's a very personal subject to me and some of this threads contents I found upsetting. What I meant to do, and clearly failed, was reiterate that no two people will go through the same - but I used rather too many words to get there. Next time I shall step away.
I completely agree with your comments on Cullen's romance. It was wonderful but there was a depth to it that was lacking. As you say, lack of development time/money I guess. The combination of trauma and addiction is a potent one and I think that could have been handled a bit better.
My last paragraph was intended to mean that Samson's personal addiction almost didn't come into it (from what I saw) - and that in DA:I it was mainly about him wanting to give Templars some type of alternative. There was also a lot of focus on his hate for the Chantry. From what I remember, Cullen mentions Samson is a lyrium addict when the whole questline first opens up and then that's it till the judgement I believe.
Certainly, Samson would have stayed as a beggar on the streets of Kirkwall if not for Corypheus, that is true. What I don't understand is why Samson above everyone else. The whole storyline, to me anyway, is not plausible and there wasn't enough explanation as to Samson's sudden rise to power. I'm not sure that is fair to him as a character. But that's just my opinion.
I didn't want to go into the ending slide for Cullen on a Samson thread either - but, for me that is the most unrealistic outcome of the lot. Not because of the tragic descent into addiction which would be inevitable, but because of the actions, or lack of, from the people around him. I don't think the two of them would have ended up in the same situation at all. There's either some warped parallel being drawn by having Cullen in the same position as what would have happened to Samson, or it was just lazy writing/lack of time.
As it stands, they wouldn't have had too dissimilar deaths in either scenario - just that Samson would be in a dungeon instead of the streets?
I haven't drawn any comparisons between the two men and their addictions, at any point. I've written about how Cullen and Samson differ in their recoveries based on the resources they were given and their personality traits.
What I highlighted was the lack of sympathy in the fandom for a canonically homeless and addicted Samson in DA2 in comparison to the hypothetically homeless and addicted Cullen at the end of Trespasser. I specifically said Samson in DA2 in each of my posts.
One addict is overlooked by the fandom during the darkest part of his addiction (Samson in DA2), while the other is "saved" in fics and in art during his (Cullen) and that's a shame.
Sorry, my post was obviously badly written. I thought I'd mentioned that I didn't mean to single out one person or another on the thread. I didn't mean to highlight you personally and I agree with what you've said.
I have no idea if it was deliberate or by accident but I think it's quite a 'good' parallel for BioWare to have drawn. The scenarios they have created with Samson and Cullen ie some more popular than others, are ones that play out in real life every day which is hugely sad.