Essence (n): attribute or set of attributes that make an entity or substance what it fundamentally is. In the context of the story, It's literary mumbo-jumbo and just vague enough to be molded into whatever the writer's felt like making it. Except it's never actually referred to as anything metaphysical like 'knowledge' or 'memories'.
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT 'ESSENCE' MEANS. Carbon, being a required element in organic material, absolutely constitutes "essence". "Essence" in-context wouldn't just refer to carbon though, since the Reapers explicitly harvest sentient beings. "Essence" would include every other element in the body, from oxygen to nitrogen to methane to hydrogen, among others.
Whether or not they're interested is entirely not the point, because that's what they do.
There's no indication whatsoever that the Reapers are selective of anything besides their "are they advanced enough?" criterion. Occam's razor would suggest that the husks are made because if the Reapers want to harvest, simply nuking the planet from orbit would be a pretty f**king poor way to go about it, and since they have no means of simply manufacturing ground troops, they must convert the local populace.
Besides, if the Reapers cared at all about "preserving" people, they wouldn't create more husks than they needed to, because the person>husk conversion process destroys or otherwise alters the base components of the body (fluids are drained out, bones are broken, and the body is physically morphed to suit whatever the function of the husk variant is). They do it because they HAVE TO, not because of some made-up selection process.
It's entire idiotic thought experiment goes against its programming, and I've explained why.
Legitimately not sure if you're f**king with me with this statement or if you're an idiot.
Why is it that I can actually explain my case when you and the other guy are apparently only capable of "no, you're wrong" or "you don't understand (a personal favorite of mine)? The latter is especially funny, because if I'm capable of discussing it on a fundamental level like this, then I must obviously understand it to be able to talk about it. Saying "you don't understand" just shows that you have no idea how that word works, and that you have nothing to back up your claims. It's creationist logic.
First, I'd like you to stop putting words in my mouth. I never said "you do not understand", as far as I can tell we were having an intelligent conversation which you just interrupted by questioning my intelligence. I'm not sure if it's even worth to continue this discussion with you but we can do that if you manage to stay civil in the future.
Second, I give you codex entry on harvesting (I'll underline the parts I referenced in my earlier post for convenience):





Retour en haut







