... SO OT but GG, I thought it was about corrupt journalism
It should have been and I'd like to believe it was the original intent. But it got way out of hand.
I agree he covered it pretty well for the most part, he painted them both as being in the wrong, though not without merit (though let's be honest, he was definitely more critical of one side.) He absolutely did lie however. He implied he had read the articles, which means he either willingly misinformed his viewers, or he hadn't read them despite making it clear that he had.
Or he didn't read them all thoroughly or he misinterpreted them. But I would not accuse him of lying.





Retour en haut





