Aller au contenu

Photo

Romance Pack DLC for Inquisition? (SPOILERS)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
126 réponses à ce sujet

#26
halafradrimx

halafradrimx
  • Members
  • 43 messages

I think Bioware can be using their time for actual worthwhile DLC. I mean you have 8 people to choose from you don't need to romance every character under the sun.

Did you actually play the game? There aren't 8 options at all.

 

If you are heterosexual, even fewer.



#27
Grieving Natashina

Grieving Natashina
  • Members
  • 14 513 messages

Actually, there is 8 options available, if you're willing to roleplay as something other than a heterosexual male character.  There is two options for the straight male character, the same as there was in DA:O (Morrigan and Leliana) and the same as there was in DA2 (Isabela and Merrill.)   It's very weird to me that, for the first time, gay and lesbian players have the same amount of content and yet, all of a sudden, straight guys are "getting the shaft."  Uh-huh, sure.  :rolleyes:

 

 

What's funny is that straight women do have four options.  Well, if they play as an elf or human.  If they play a dwarf or Qunari, they also get two options.  The devs have also stated that, due to the controversy of needing some of the character files in the base game and the claims that folks are "paying for the same content twice," there is not going to be a DLC companion of any sort, romance or otherwise.  I figure that the most we'll probably get is some sort of temporary character ala Tallis.


  • daveliam et Caja aiment ceci

#28
Terodil

Terodil
  • Members
  • 942 messages

Actually, there is 8 options available, if you're willing to roleplay as something other than a heterosexual male character.  There is two options for the straight male character, the same as there was in DA:O (Morrigan and Leliana) and the same as there was in DA2 (Isabela and Merrill.)   It's very weird to me that, for the first time, gay and lesbian players have the same amount of content and yet, all of a sudden, straight guys are "getting the shaft."  Uh-huh, sure.  :rolleyes:


Yeah, on the one hand, some posters do pull the comparison card which I don't think is helpful for anybody. On the other hand, I'm not very happy with the romances in DA:I as far as straight male inquisitors and bi-/homosexual female inquisitors are concerned. I liked the straight female options and the homosexual male option, personally. Sadly, as we have seen in the last couple of days again, that whole topic seems to be a taboo for various reasons. =/
 

[...] there is not going to be a DLC companion of any sort, romance or otherwise.  I figure that the most we'll probably get is some sort of temporary character ala Tallis.


Please, no. I'd rather swallow a baseball bat with nails than face a Tallis again.

#29
Grieving Natashina

Grieving Natashina
  • Members
  • 14 513 messages

Yeah, on the one hand, some posters do pull the comparison card which I don't think is helpful for anybody. On the other hand, I'm not very happy with the romances in DA:I as far as straight male inquisitors and bi-/homosexual female inquisitors are concerned. I liked the straight female options and the homosexual male option, personally. Sadly, as we have seen in the last couple of days again, that whole topic seems to be a taboo for various reasons. =/
 

Please, no. I'd rather swallow a baseball bat with nails than face a Tallis again.

I had no arguments for the choices I got playing a straight female character (I'm bisexual myself.)  I played a dwarven lady and really enjoyed Bull's romance.

 

And as far as Tallis goes, I'm not a fan of her either.  At all.  She was just an example of a temporary character from a BW game.  



#30
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 458 messages

Gaspard <3

 

Though I'm pretty sure BW won't add any options. They have 8 LI's in this game and it's more than any other DA game. DAO had 4 and DA2 had 4+1 (DLC). So 8 is quite big jump ahead.


  • daveliam, Felya87 et Grieving Natashina aiment ceci

#31
daveliam

daveliam
  • Members
  • 8 436 messages

Gaspard <3

 

Though I'm pretty sure BW won't add any options. They have 8 LI's in this game and it's more than any other DA game. DAO had 4 and DA2 had 4+1 (DLC). So 8 is quite big jump ahead.

 

This is a great point.  For a DA game, DA: I has a ton of romance options.  ****, it's double what was in DA: O.  An people still aren't happy.  I think that this demonstrates that there's nothing that they can do to please everyone.  To be honest, I kind of selfishly wish that they had never added in Cullen and Solas, so people wouldn't have this skewed vision of 'getting shafted' in their options.  If everyone just had two options, then it would be much more obvious that people just don't like their choices, not that their choices are somehow inferior.  Of course, that's easy to say, given that I've never played as a human or elf, so giving up Cullen and Solas is fairly painless for me.



#32
Terodil

Terodil
  • Members
  • 942 messages

To be honest, I kind of selfishly wish that they had never added in Cullen and Solas, so people wouldn't have this skewed vision of 'getting shafted' in their options.  If everyone just had two options, then it would be much more obvious that people just don't like their choices, not that their choices are somehow inferior.


a- If people dislike their choices, colloquial expression would have them say that they are inferior. Since this is an opinion, the "your mileage may vary" is always implied, and misconstruing it as a universal statement tries to shift the discussion to an objective level that neither opinion, neither pro nor con, has any footing on -- but it does invite moral outrage, conflict, grief. No good.

b- Cullen and Solas are good additions. The game would be poorer without them. I enjoyed the Cullen romance, funnily enough, although I never was a fan of him before (his character seems to have matured a lot / got a big helping of 'compatibilisation', however you wish to see it). I don't see why it would be a good course of action to take these from the people who enjoyed them simply to prove a theoretical point about "equal opportunities".

c- I still reserve the right to dislike female lesbian and male straight options, and to say so. It really irks me how BSN jumps on anybody who dares to voice their feelings on those romances, as if it were a moral taboo to do so. Note that this touches in no way on b- -- I am happy for the female/straight and the male/gay characters (players behind them) and would not wish them to get treated any worse because I'm not happy. I do think that there is considerable room for improvement though.

#33
ThreeF

ThreeF
  • Members
  • 2 245 messages

The only solution to this is to make a new dating sim franchise.  if the level of character writing is on par with DA and if steered far away from the Japanese equivalent it could make quite a profit.


  • Panda aime ceci

#34
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 458 messages

This is a great point.  For a DA game, DA: I has a ton of romance options.  ****, it's double what was in DA: O.  An people still aren't happy.  I think that this demonstrates that there's nothing that they can do to please everyone.  To be honest, I kind of selfishly wish that they had never added in Cullen and Solas, so people wouldn't have this skewed vision of 'getting shafted' in their options.  If everyone just had two options, then it would be much more obvious that people just don't like their choices, not that their choices are somehow inferior.  Of course, that's easy to say, given that I've never played as a human or elf, so giving up Cullen and Solas is fairly painless for me.

 

I don't think people would have been happy even with 10 or 100 options lol. That's because people are different and like different things which is okay.

 

I don't think lot of straight female players would have been happy in that case since Solas and Cullen are lot more popular than Blackwall and Iron Bull.


  • Terodil aime ceci

#35
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 806 messages

The idea of being stuck with Blackwall and Iron Bull as the only options for straight female PC's sounds really sh*tty lol.



#36
daveliam

daveliam
  • Members
  • 8 436 messages

a- If people dislike their choices, colloquial expression would have them say that they are inferior. Since this is an opinion, the "your mileage may vary" is always implied, and misconstruing it as a universal statement tries to shift the discussion to an objective level that neither opinion, neither pro nor con, has any footing on -- but it does invite moral outrage, conflict, grief. No good.

b- Cullen and Solas are good additions. The game would be poorer without them. I enjoyed the Cullen romance, funnily enough, although I never was a fan of him before (his character seems to have matured a lot / got a big helping of 'compatibilisation', however you wish to see it). I don't see why it would be a good course of action to take these from the people who enjoyed them simply to prove a theoretical point about "equal opportunities".

c- I still reserve the right to dislike female lesbian and male straight options, and to say so. It really irks me how BSN jumps on anybody who dares to voice their feelings on those romances, as if it were a moral taboo to do so.

 

Just to clarify, I think people are free to post whatever they want to post, provided that they aren't breaking board rules.  My personal opinion is that, if Cullen and Solas were not LI's, there wouldn't have been outrage at the skewed ratio.  That outrage just ramped up people's dislike of Cassandra and Josephine to create the perfect storm that we are currently dealing with, where at least one or two new "the straight male LI's are terrible/manly/ugly/etc." threads are created each day.

 

Would we still get people complaining about them?  Sure.  But I genuinely think that, if everyone had two option, we wouldn't see that outrage that we are seeing.  That's just my personal opinion. 

 

And, keep in mind that prior to DA: I being released, I was a huge proponent of them creating whatever romances they wanted, provided everyone got at least two options.  I had no problems with some groups getting more than others, especially if they were going to mix up which group got more.  But, frankly, the boards have been really tough to deal with lately and a lot of it has to do with the negativity that has come about because of the straight male LI's.  Again, my opinion.


  • Terodil et Grieving Natashina aiment ceci

#37
daveliam

daveliam
  • Members
  • 8 436 messages

I don't think people would have been happy even with 10 or 100 options lol. That's because people are different and like different things which is okay.

 

I don't think lot of straight female players would have been happy in that case since Solas and Cullen are lot more popular than Blackwall and Iron Bull.

The idea of being stuck with Blackwall and Iron Bull as the only options for straight female PC's sounds really sh*tty lol.

 

LOL.  Okay, so maybe that wouldn't have helped out!  :lol:



#38
ThreeF

ThreeF
  • Members
  • 2 245 messages

This is a great point.  For a DA game, DA: I has a ton of romance options.  ****, it's double what was in DA: O.  An people still aren't happy.  I think that this demonstrates that there's nothing that they can do to please everyone.  To be honest, I kind of selfishly wish that they had never added in Cullen and Solas, so people wouldn't have this skewed vision of 'getting shafted' in their options.  If everyone just had two options, then it would be much more obvious that people just don't like their choices, not that their choices are somehow inferior.  Of course, that's easy to say, given that I've never played as a human or elf, so giving up Cullen and Solas is fairly painless for me.

 

The "mistake" was not to include the typical bad girl DA always had, from that perspective even making Blackwall a female would bring something of it, however I put quotes there because discussing what should  and what shouldn't be in romance options is like putting the cart before the horse (which is the characters  themselves and the story). Heck some people are just dissatisfied with how their options look.


  • TheGreatDeadpoolio28 aime ceci

#39
Terodil

Terodil
  • Members
  • 942 messages
Dave: Yeah, I agree. And I would also expect there to always be complaints, perhaps more, perhaps less.

Why people may not dislike Cassandra or Josephine, but may dislike, say, Blackwall and Iron Bull, is beyond me. I'm aware that there's nothing to be done now, but maybe everybody needs a cookie, hm?
  • daveliam aime ceci

#40
ThreeF

ThreeF
  • Members
  • 2 245 messages

The idea of being stuck with Blackwall and Iron Bull as the only options for straight female PC's sounds really sh*tty lol.

 

Single IQ for life crafting a chastity belt at the first opportunity.



#41
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 806 messages

Single IQ for life crafting a chastity belt at the first opportunity.

 

I can see it being a T3 schematic. 22 nugskin, 5 great bear, 3 dragon webbing hide and 15 silverite ftw.


  • Esther aime ceci

#42
ThreeF

ThreeF
  • Members
  • 2 245 messages

I can see it being a T3 schematic. 22 nugskin, 5 great bear hide and 15 silverite.

yes, exactly!



#43
DaemionMoadrin

DaemionMoadrin
  • Members
  • 5 855 messages

As I wrote in a similiar thread, I'd rather see DLC that expanded on the existing romances instead of introducing new ones. None of the options appealed to me, there simply wasn't "my type" among them. Neither straight, bi or gay matters in that case... what I am looking for is an actual relationship and not 4 conversations, 3 cutscenes and 2 conversations/banter from the companions after. There's not enough content in any romance. Things don't change.

 

Why is your LI not moving into your chambers? Why do they never surprise you with anything? Why do you always have to initiate everything? Why does nothing change?

 

Oh... and the IB romance? BioWare -really- needs to get some writers who know what they are writing about. Holy crap, this is almost as wrong as 50 Shades of Grey.

 

Although my main beef with the DA:I romances might simply be that I can't related to any of the NPCs in game, because they are all so... meh. I don't know.


  • Terodil et TheGreatDeadpoolio28 aiment ceci

#44
Terodil

Terodil
  • Members
  • 942 messages

The "mistake" was not to include the typical bad girl DA always had, from that perspective even making Blackwall a female would bring something of it, however I put quotes there because discussing what should  and what shouldn't be in romance options is like putting the cart before the horse (which is the characters  themselves and the story). Heck some people are just dissatisfied with how their options look.


Well, Sera goes a long way in that direction though. Although with her, it's more "immature" than "bad", imo, with a weird helping of "surprisingly wise" sprinkled in (= good, interesting!). But I'm still pining for the likes of Jack, or, from my recent playthrough of NWN: HotU, Nathyrra. =(

And yeah, looks is one among many other relevant things, such as character, character development/story etc., and can also be subject to criticism. Which I share for a large part, btw.

#45
Guest_Corvus I_*

Guest_Corvus I_*
  • Guests
I am not sure about Leliana or Verric because they both have history and lore, and I am not sure that Vivienne does not have a future role to play, but I really like your idea for the rest of the party, allowing the members to cross genders. It would be hard to do for Sera and Dorrian, but perhaps the others.

I would also not mind a couple of temptation options, where while in the Pub some NPC tries to hit on our Inquisitor and IF successful the Inquisitor takes a hit from their LI, up to and even including breaking up.
  • DaemionMoadrin et Terodil aiment ceci

#46
Big Magnet

Big Magnet
  • Members
  • 594 messages

+1 for a scout Harding romance!  :wizard:

 

(including a sweet but goofy "Dance lesson" scene before the Winter Palace, because in my mind the inquisitor was a worse dancer than Commander Shepard before taking lessons)



#47
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 806 messages

Dave: Yeah, I agree. And I would also expect there to always be complaints, perhaps more, perhaps less.

Why people may not dislike Cassandra or Josephine, but may dislike, say, Blackwall and Iron Bull, is beyond me. I'm aware that there's nothing to be done now, but maybe everybody needs a cookie, hm?

 

Well, I can't say that the two pairs are exactly on equal footing here. While I can't really see too wrong with Iron Bull's persona, the fact that he's a big ass minotaur does present a bit of an obstacle for those who prefer the less beastly variety (that's putting aside the potentially off-putting sexually domineering stuff), and Blackwall's a total fraud that you have to bust out of prison in order to keep around.



#48
Terodil

Terodil
  • Members
  • 942 messages

Well, I can't say that the two pairs are exactly on equal footing here. While I can't really see a whole lot wrong with Iron Bull's persona, the fact that he's a big ass minotaur does present a bit of an obstacle for those who prefer the less beastly variety, and Blackwall's a total fraud that you have to bust out of prison in order to keep around.


I don't agree, but I'm leaving it at that in order to not derail the thread. Tastes are tastes, and bringing morality into it is morally wrong ;)

#49
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 458 messages

LOL.  Okay, so maybe that wouldn't have helped out!  :lol:

 

Yep. I think the problem with having only Blackwall and Iron Bull would be that many players might not be comfortable with idea of BDSM and Blackwall's lying about who he is and being mercenary who has murdered children can be too much for them. I'd say Cullen is safest choice as LI for straight female characters.



#50
Uccio

Uccio
  • Members
  • 4 696 messages

Lace, please.


  • Terodil et Warden Commander Aeducan aiment ceci