Excuse me? But who are you to say "we"? You speak for me? I don't think so my dear.
I love the multiplayer and met really nice people through it who enjoy the MP too. Everyday I play with a few friends and we've a lot of fun. The devs have also said that there's more to come.
No one is forcing you to play MP. Microtransacions? No one is forcing you to buy platinum. If someone does that's his own choice.
Nowhere did I say "we feel this way or that way". I said "we" as a community might have gotten a better SP game had there not been MP. Neither did I say "we as a community believe this or that". Not sure where you got that idea from.
As to your original question about 'was it forced by EA?', I don't know, but my feeling is, no. I believe Bioware always wanted to put MP in DA:I and DA:O, in particular. Perhaps DA2 as well, although the design/setting of the game doesn't lend itself as well to MP.
With respect to your opinion about 'integrating' the two making MP more interesting...ah, hell no. If it requires integration into a SP campaign in order to be enjoyable, it is a failure. Moreover, we were promised until the devs twitter thumbs were bloody that the two modes would be totally separate and it was on launch. Changing that now....let's say that wouldn't be the best look and move on.
As a general rule, I have no problem with SP affecting MP, but the other way around is a big fat red flag. It practically screams 'pay to win'. But if people wanted - and got - to play their Inquisitor in MP matches, that wouldn't bother me in the slightest (as long as nothing they achieved in MP in any way opened up something in SP that couldn't also be unlocked via SP only).
If the MP was based on the wartable missions we sent our forces on, it would have been better. Let us be the charger or other INQ forces setting off to set right the wrong of the world.





Retour en haut







