105 réponses à ce sujet

[Inprea]

The thing is, I like the "exile" option in this one, because of how the Inquisitor struggles to phrase the sentence "officially". It coincides with the RP I try keeping up for my char. This reluctancy towards such official business sounds exactly as I would want him to sound like in all instances, really.

 

I tend to try to role play my Inquisitor as humble but certain when she takes actions. I do agree the tone of voice was nice though as the crime seemed so minor. Yet I don't want to be disrespectful towards their culture despite finding smacking someone's home with goat's blood as very strange. Especially when they just use an entire goat. How did your Inquisitor handle the table mission though?

 

 

Executing people is a bit too insane for my taste. If someone is no longer a threat (have surrendered and can be detained), then locking them up is always the way to go. That way they can still be judged, atone or even released later in light of new evidence.. death remains somewhat irreversible. If the crime haven't yet caused the death of innocent bystanders, then the person may yet be redeemed.

 

Exile is a good alternative to imprisonment, provided that the person can't cause any more harm.

 

Killing someone after thay have surrendered sends only one message.. expect no mercy from us.. you might aswell go down guns blazing, because that is your only chance at living.

 

I don't really agree with that mercy part. Josephene said it herself. Death may be a mercy and at least a few of the prisoners felt that way. I like to think the wardens did far worse then death when you give them the mage that duped them. Just the same if you refuse to kill you're telling them that they can pull whatever crap they want and as long as they surrender before you get to them they'll be spared.

[Cadeym]

This may seem odd, but I never actually cared about showing mercy or in what the prisoners wanted. My entire point of view is centered on eventually providing closure/justice for those who were wronged, and you can't make dead people mentally or physically atone/suffer, which is why I think locking the people up is a better option than killing them.

 

I guess you could argue that executing people would bring people closure, but I see it like pissing in your pants to stay warm. It may be nice at first, but what will you do once you get cold once more.

[Inprea]

This may seem odd, but I never actually cared about showing mercy or in what the prisoners wanted. My entire point of view is centered on eventually providing closure/justice for those who were wronged, and you can't make dead people mentally or physically atone/suffer, which is why I think locking the people up is a better option than killing them.

 

I guess you could argue that executing people would bring people closure, but I see it like pissing in your pants to stay warm. It may be nice at first, but what will you do once you get cold once more.

 

Since when has pain compensated another for their suffering? Hurting the perpetrator doesn't restore what the victim lost and may only feed a sadistic desire in others. Sort of like how Vivian responded to a public hanging. "I thought we were more civilized then this." Locking them up just means they're a drain on your resources as well though and still leaves the victim missing something.

 

I can agree with work camps or forcing the prisoner to work to make amends but if you're just going to lock them up and hope they change I believe you may as well just kill them. Having them suffer just means they have a chance to escape and a vendetta.

[CoM Solaufein]

I'm fair but I won't stand for betrayal. Off go their heads. Unfortunately my character didn't get too involved in the actual execution itself.

[Gold Dragon]

I tend to try to role play my Inquisitor as humble but certain when she takes actions. I do agree the tone of voice was nice though as the crime seemed so minor. Yet I don't want to be disrespectful towards their culture despite finding smacking someone's home with goat's blood as very strange. Especially when they just use an entire goat. How did your Inquisitor handle the table mission though?

 

 

 

[snip]

 

Best Advisor to use is Leliana (secrets).  If Josephine is used, Tevinter sends you a rather nasty note (quite funny, but nasty), and Cullen can't find them.

[Lord Jaric]

I just recently completed my first playthrough and this is how I passed judgemnet.

 

Movran the Under- This guy just bugled my mind. As the first judgment it wasn't what I was expecting. So I just did the gibbet punishment

 

Gereon Alexius- This guy did some bad things (and his future self did worse but I found that irreverent), but deep down his real reasons were to try and save his son. So I had him work with the mages.

 

Poulin- I found her crime to sell her own people to be terrible but she was also trying to help the others of her village. So I sent her to help rebuild her village.

 

Gregory Dedrick- I found what he did to be absolutely terrible, but his attentions were to protect his people from the blight. So I felt exile and exeuction to much and in the end it was in Fereldan's jurisdiction.

 

Florianne de Chalons- Becuase she failed to at her assination I just decided to drop her down from her nobility down to common work.

 

Livius Erimond- Now this guy... this guy was a whole nother story. The damage he did to the Grey Wardens and the threat that he presented, he was my one and only exeuction.

 

Ruth- She like the other Grey Wardens and been minlpulated and used so I gave her divine forgiveness.

 

Blackwall- This one felt the most personal. He did a grave crime but he was willing to sacrifice himself to save another man for the crime showing he wanted to atone for his crime so I let him live and fight.

 

Samson- He seemed more like a broken man then anything. So I gave him to Cullen to be quesitoned

 

Crassious Servis- For this guys crimes I just threw him in my prison where he stayed alone.