"From what I can tell, the templar supporters are still a minority anywhere else but BSN. Remember, the Templar supporters are still a vocal minority and are only talking because this is the first game which doesn't show the faction bad sides while emphasizing some of their good traits. Wonder how many templar supporters would still exist if they were portrayed negatively in subsequent games or if some of the templar negatives were shown if you side with them, such as some templars refusing to help you if you were a mage or a templar raping an inquisition mage."
Excuse me, but the Templars in Origins (not Awakenings) were, for the most part, decent enough. Cullen was, as was the Knight-Commander, can't think of his name. They were set upon by Abominations and most of them wiped out, but the Knight-Commander still gives the Warden a chance to save those mages and Templars who are still alive.
Templars are essentially jailors. In any system where there are jailors, you are going to have those in authority who abuse that power. Certainly the Kirkwall Circle is a prime example of what happens when authority looks the other way too long with the minions abuse their charges. But just as you cannot condemn all mages for the actions of some, it is equally unfair to condemn all Templars for the actions of some.
The question is not whether or not there should be mage prisons--some mages are evil and capable of great destruction. They need to be confined. The question has always been SHOULD ALL MAGES BE IMPRISONED simply for being mages? I think the answer is "no," but I also understand why Templars need to exist in a world where insane mages can ignite entire villages or become Pride Demons.
Theen let Cass rebuild the seekers and side with the mages. That way, the mages get freedom while the Seekers hunt down any abominations and rogue mages. Best of both worlds.





Retour en haut





