I also find it funny that pro-templars see a templar go bad and say "that's just an exception. you can't condemn them all for what they did" and yet whenever a mage uses blood magic or becomes an abomination, they go "see, we were right. all mages are corrupt/incompetent". I support a circle system but not the way it is now. Letting templars believe they have divine right to punish mages is just asking for abuses. Heck, the codex entry for templars says that the chantry prefers templars that are fanatical in their faith rather than moral ones. In other words, the chantry would prefer someone like Meredith to someone like Barris or Evangeline. Heck, even Gregoir was willing to beat up a pregnant mage in the dragon age comic released before DAO came out.
Even if the templars are reformed, DA2 and Inquisition have pretty much confirmed that corrupt leadership can damn the templars and thus the mages. Thrask and Samson imply that the Gallows wasn't the rape and abuse prison it is now before Meredith came to power. Inquisition pretty much confirmed much of the templar leadership was corrupt and if you don't side with them, the templar order is competely corrupted. All it takes is one bad leader and the templars will become like the ones in Kirkwall. I can never justify the possibility of rape, abuse, and taking people's children right from their arms and telling them they will never see them again. Thank goodness that Leliana permanently disbands the templars and allows mages to form their own independent circle system. I think the future for mages will be brighter without the templars.
I'm not against the templar as an order. I think Leliana and Cassandra's seekers can make southern thedas better if they inspire future generations to get their **** together. There's no guarantee that the college will fare any better. I just think whatever group the Inquisitor sides with, Leliana's message of freedom and justice takes root.





Retour en haut




