75 réponses à ce sujet

[Googlesaurus]

Actually Da2 IS a more legit fail. That's not a opinion. Where people bash ME3 ending, ppl bash Da2 as a whole, they literally ****** on the CD before burning it. ME3 wasn't a let down, its ending was, get it? 

 

Never seen anyone complain about intro, auto dialogue etc. It's either ending or  just the ending.

 

And you're obviously one of those I'm talking about. 

 

Many parts of ME3 were bad. People only focused on the part that offended them the most (the ending), absolving all the other issues in the game. 

[IamOuterRate]

Funny how I just now find out you people complained about more then the ending. These other complaints are obviously in different corners with a small minority clinging to them so don't try to sling them in as if they were actually a problem.

[IamOuterRate]

Most of ME3 was bad. People only focused on the part that offended them the most (the ending), absolving all the other issues in the game. 

I'm sure that first sentence is false.

[RoboticWater]

Actually Da2 IS a more legit fail. That's not a opinion. Where people bash ME3 ending, ppl bash Da2 as a whole, they literally ****** on the CD before burning it. ME3 wasn't a let down, its ending was, get it? 

 

Never seen anyone complain about intro, auto dialogue etc. It's either ending or  just the ending.

 

And you're obviously one of those I'm talking about. 

You must be trolling:

-Why so much Auto-Dialouge in ME3? Most Disappointing part of the game

-The dialogues in the first hours of ME3 were inappropriate to have so early on.

[Googlesaurus]

I'm sure that first sentence is false.

 

I'm sure it's true. Would you like to have an informed discussion on the topic?

[IamOuterRate]

You must be trolling:

-Why so much Auto-Dialouge in ME3? Most Disappointing part of the game

-The dialogues in the first hours of ME3 were inappropriate to have so early on.

Refer to my recent post

[IamOuterRate]

I'm sure it's true. Would you like to have an informed discussion on the topic?

False I'm sure. Shoot, you're just gonna list all the new reasons I just found out made ME3 bad.

[Vazgen]

All those problems would've been glanced over and forgotten if the ending was fine for many. Like it was in ME1 and ME2. However, the ending did not satisfy players and the game was analyzed from A to Z bringing all the other problems to the front. Still, I would not call these problems "minor" because they, in turn, influenced people opinion on the ending. It's all connected you see.

ME3 is the best game of the trilogy (and the best game of all I've played) for me. It does not, however, mean that it is flawless. Far from that. There are many issues and ignoring them will only hinder future game development.

[IamOuterRate]

All those problems would've been glanced over and forgotten if the ending was fine for many. Like it was in ME1 and ME2. However, the ending did not satisfy players and the game was analyzed from A to Z bringing all the other problems to the front. Still, I would not call these problems "minor" because they, in turn, influenced people opinion on the ending. It's all connected you see.

ME3 is the best game of the trilogy (and the best game of all I've played) for me. It does not, however, mean that it is flawless. Far from that. There are many issues and ignoring them will only hinder future game development.

I'd agree the game was not flawless.But those problems listed are in different corners with small minorities clinging to them.

[Googlesaurus]

I'd agree the game was not flawless.But those problems listed are in different corners with small minorities clinging to them.

 

I suppose in your worldview, the veracity of a proposition is determined by how many people care to argue about it. 

 

We can talk about the huge character inconsistencies displayed between ME2 and ME3, the complete character reversal of the geth, the fundamental misunderstanding of how tragedy works with the usage of the Dead Child, poorly designed missions, nonsensical details within said missions, the silliness of finding and completing Citadel missions, the overall limited weapon and armor customization, blah blah blah. They are not game-breaking in themselves but they add up quickly. 

[o Ventus]

There is only 1, they'll yell the ending. I'd agree getting the ending correct is GOOD but to say the ending made the game horrible? 75+ hours of epicness and the ending makes you call the game trash and vow not to play any other Bioware games? 

 

I'll making this topic after reading a very recent article where there were loads of ppl saying. "Well after that ME3 fiasco(the ending obviously), I'm not gonna get ME4" . I just don't see why people act like they played the game then say the ending made it trash, how does that make sense? I played the game, enjoyed it. Initial ending made it drop a point but it's still 8 out of 10.

 

Let me know if you agree or not. I just feel these ppl need to get a life, they were probably the same guys appearing on every DAi promotion saying Da2(A more legit fail by Bioware) ruined any chance of them buying DAi.

How slow are you that ME3 takes you 75 hours? It takes me, at the very most, 20 hours, and that's on the second-to-highest difficulty. My Insanity save is pegged at 23 hours, with the only thing not done being the Citadel DLC (I played the save before the DLC came out).

 

And I would hardly call the other 20 hours I experienced "epic", when all I could notice were the obvious plot holes, character inconsistencies, and the total ignorance of logic for the sake of cheap drama, and this is all disregarding the sh*tty ending.

[o Ventus]

I utterly disagree completely.

 

There's really no measure on how to end an epic. Nor do they need to be constrained to what you think they should be.

Strictly speaking, you're right. An author or writer is free to write whatever they please in whatever manner they choose.

 

But any writer who enjoys the craft and wants to make a living with it (like, say, a writer who works on video game scripts), isn't going to want to totally alienate (what I would guess) a non-insignificant portion of his reader/player/viewer base by writing a terrible, awful ending that in no way reflects the story being told and totally shifts genre.

[7twozero]

Haters are just confused fans.

[goishen]

How slow are you that ME3 takes you 75 hours? It takes me, at the very most, 20 hours, and that's on the second-to-highest difficulty. My Insanity save is pegged at 23 hours, with the only thing not done being the Citadel DLC (I played the save before the DLC came out).

 

And I would hardly call the other 20 hours I experienced "epic", when all I could notice were the obvious plot holes, character inconsistencies, and the total ignorance of logic for the sake of cheap drama, and this is all disregarding the sh*tty ending.

 

Errr, no, impossible.  Unless you skipped over some major sequenced dialogues.   I'm calling BS.

[o Ventus]

Errr, no, impossible.  Unless you skipped over some major sequenced dialogues.   I'm calling BS.

20 hours, on a non-complete playthrough, is nearly a full day of continuous gameplay.

 

Also, my fastest ME2 playthrough is 18 hours, but that's with mashing the skip button through a good 90% of the dialogue.

 

Most games I have I beat in about 2 days because I binge them, give or take a few hours. Also, I've been playing games my whole life, so I guess I'm just good at them. Very rarely do I get stuck in a game or hit a brick wall. I don't speedrun or anything, I take my time and go through at my own pace, it just doesn't take me 30 days to finish.

 

edit: my last Sentinel playthrough, with all 'gameplay' content finished across all the DLCs, is at 20 hours and 18 minutes, on Hardcore difficulty. Literally the only thing I've yet to do on that playthrough is see the different permutations for the party in the Citadel DLC (I've done energetic/dancing, and I've not seen the others).

[IamOuterRate]

I suppose in your worldview, the veracity of a proposition is determined by how many people care to argue about it. 

 

We can talk about the huge character inconsistencies displayed between ME2 and ME3, the complete character reversal of the geth, the fundamental misunderstanding of how tragedy works with the usage of the Dead Child, poorly designed missions, nonsensical details within said missions, the silliness of finding and completing Citadel missions, the overall limited weapon and armor customization, blah blah blah. They are not game-breaking in themselves but they add up quickly. 

Small minority cling to those. My first ever seeing them.

[IamOuterRate]

How slow are you that ME3 takes you 75 hours? It takes me, at the very most, 20 hours, and that's on the second-to-highest difficulty. My Insanity save is pegged at 23 hours, with the only thing not done being the Citadel DLC (I played the save before the DLC came out).

 

And I would hardly call the other 20 hours I experienced "epic", when all I could notice were the obvious plot holes, character inconsistencies, and the total ignorance of logic for the sake of cheap drama, and this is all disregarding the sh*tty ending.

Bulllll SH***** obviously

[IamOuterRate]

20 hours, on a non-complete playthrough, is nearly a full day of continuous gameplay.

 

Also, my fastest ME2 playthrough is 18 hours, but that's with mashing the skip button through a good 90% of the dialogue.

 

Most games I have I beat in about 2 days because I binge them, give or take a few hours. Also, I've been playing games my whole life, so I guess I'm just good at them. Very rarely do I get stuck in a game or hit a brick wall. I don't speedrun or anything, I take my time and go through at my own pace, it just doesn't take me 30 days to finish.

 

edit: my last Sentinel playthrough, with all 'gameplay' content finished across all the DLCs, is at 20 hours and 18 minutes, on Hardcore difficulty. Literally the only thing I've yet to do on that playthrough is see the different permutations for the party in the Citadel DLC (I've done energetic/dancing, and I've not seen the others).

You honestly expect any to believe you beat these games in less then a day(with all content) and noted all things wrong with the game itself whilst taking your sweet time? At least try not to sound like you're spewing Bull crap. 

[Linkenski]

I'll definitely get ME4 but I still think ME3's ending ruined the canon and I think ME4 will just go to further prove that.

[Vazgen]

My Combat Adept vanilla game playthrough took about 5 hours of gameplay. About 10 as a whole, but it was not a completionist run.

Larry's full ME3 roleplay playthrough took about 37 hours.

I'd say 23 is a plausible middle ground. He also missed Citadel DLC which is heavy on dialogue. 

[themikefest]

I recently did a trilogy run that took 19 hours. I could've done it faster if I didn't take my time in ME3

[God]

Each game takes me roughly anywhere from 35-50 hours. 

 

It's sad being a completionist.

[Vazgen]

Each game takes me roughly anywhere from 35-50 hours. 

 

It's sad being a completionist.

ME2 takes the longest for me. Mostly because I deplete every available planet

[o Ventus]

You honestly expect any to believe you beat these games in less then a day(with all content) and noted all things wrong with the game itself whilst taking your sweet time? At least try not to sound like you're spewing Bull crap. 

 

Learn how to read and think critically. I go AT MY OWN PACE. Which is pretty quick. I even gave you the exact time of my last save on that file, which I got from booting up the game and looking. You literally cannot disprove me on this.

 

I've also played through the game at least 10 times, far more than enough to notice all of the really idiotic bits of the game. Check my ME3 profile and manifest to see how long I've had the game.

 

If everything I've said indicates that I've played the game more than once (I explicitly said "my last SENTINEL playthrough" earlier, implying that that save is one of several across different classes), why are you pushing that I've played the game only once?

 

I don't know why you're so incapable of believing that a fairly short game can be beaten in a fairly short amount of time, but it only makes YOU look like an idiot.

[goishen]

Look, he's saying that he skips the dialogue sequences.  I never doubted him there.  If he just played the game as a cover mechanic...   Sure,  You can prolly beat the game in 23 hours.

 

I just don't understand why you're on here yelling at someone for it taking them longer especially when they want to enjoy the dialogue?  And beside that, how do you know that he isn't talking about all three games put together?  He doesn't make it clear in his original post.