Aller au contenu

Photo

Vivienne: Complex Characters are so Thrilling, My Dear


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
270 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Cecilia

Cecilia
  • Members
  • 235 messages
Spinning this off into a new thread because we were hijacking the Dorian thread (sorry~) 
 

Personally, I think Vivienne's ethnicity made her even more cringeworthy than her personality already makes her. Having the one black companion in the series being the main advocate for keeping oppressed minorities down strikes me as... problematic.

 

 

Please don't. And as a "person of color," whatever that means, I happen to like how Vivienne held her own views and didn't bend to will of the Inquisitor or go for the pity party like just about everyone else. 

 

 

Pity parties are so terribly dull, darling.

 

 

Vivienne?  Is that you, my dear?

 

 

It's getting a little redundant how many people believe Viv is all OPPRESSTHEMAGES because if you actually do talk to her about mage rights/next Divine she supports Cassandra's platform for reform, which, if you recruited the mages as allies, is pretty liberal and allows them to choose whether or not to return to the Circles. She's definitely more hardline if you ask her to become Divine, but that's more a question of her personality than her political views - she pretty much says "there is no greater pleasure than bringing order with your own hand" - Viv's super type A and bossy and control-freaky and a lot of your dialogue with her reveals that she's basically grown up realizing that if you want something done right you have to do it yourself. 

 

Viv actually out and out says she deplores what happened to the mages at Kirkwall and really doesn't like the rampant abuse in the Circles - which is why she thinks mages should have a greater role in the Chantry - not only because mages best understand what they are capable of, but also because mages need stronger advocacy. She simply doesn't believe in tearing down the existing system for the sake of lulz. What people need to understand is Viv is a reformer but she's a moderate and a realist. Her issue with the mage rebellion isn't that they voted to dissolve the Circles it's that they chose to dissolve the Circles when all mages were being scrutinized for Anders' and Orsino's actions. She's a shrewd politician who realizes that the timing of the mage rebellion in the eyes of the rest of Thedas is the equivalent of a resounding acceptance and advocacy of what Anders and Orsino did. Basically she just thinks Fiona et. al. were short-sighted and hot-headed and did more to hurt the cause of mages than help it.

 

 

Yes~ Madame de Fer  <3

 

 

It's not just Vivienne's political views, it's those combined with the fact that she's both a massive control freak and has carved out a very cushy position for herself politically, from which she can now look down on other mages who aren't protected by the empress.

 

Vivienne's no Alrik, to be sure... but neither is she Leliana, and Leliana is the only one whom I trust in this case.

 

 

If you talk to her at Skyhold about the mage rebellion she'll tell you that she empathizes with how they felt, but really could they have chosen a worse timing to do what they did? 

 

A lot of what people hate about Viv is really just her realism - Cole provides insight into how she forcibly shuts herself off from becoming overly emotionally attached to many things because it's a weakness, both in the Circles and within the Orlesian court, and she's had to fight to survive (tooth and nail) - and she exemplifies the type of person who believes in changing oneself to adapt to the world you find yourself in rather than trying to change the world to adapt to you. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

 

Does she want power? Yes - because she believes that she is better equipped than most to utilize power to influence society for the better. You see that a lot in her conversations with Cass - how she implies that Cass has a responsibility to take the power that Cass, as a hero and a symbol herself, possesses. Viv's flaw here is really her arrogance in believing that she can and will use power more effectively than most (but again, she also will defer to people she respects like the Inquizzy or Cass - there are just very few people she views as her intellectual equals/superiors)

 

She isn't callous - there's banter with Cole that implies she was worried about him (after Cole's personal), but is simply unwilling to express it. She also *mothers* IB if you have them in the same party (that one banter where she's scolding him for picking at his wounds is so adorable). Again I think you have to take her breadth of emotional expression within the context of her life - she's spent so much of it in a place where you have to live semi-permanently under a mask and emotions can be fatal that she's learned to discipline her own expression militantly. (This is really obvious after Bastien's death - it's obviously devastating for her, but she doesn't really let anyone express their sympathy and brushes all of it off with "it will be fine, dear" - which puts a lot of her reactions to the experiences of others in context) 

 

Viv is arrogant and narrow-minded about approaches to magic/theology that are external to what she was taught and yes, a royal ****** in the best way possible, but she's never unnecessarily brutal (where have you seen her use unnecessary force relative to what seems par for the course at Orlais?), she's not an emotionlesstramplesonallyourfeelingsbecauseIcan pinnacle of callousness, and really there is nothing inherently wrong with wanting power/having ambition.

 

I honestly think a lot of the "Viv is a terrible human being" sentiment comes from players viewing themselves as revolutionaries and being jarred by having a companion who is a reformist but inherently counterrevolutionary. She's not the world's nicest person or most altruistic person and she can be a manipulative ****** and she's downright terrible to Blackwall (which turns out - deserved? idk Blackwall leaves me with complicated feelings), but in the balance she's still someone who cares about the world she lives in and is willing to put her life on the line to protect it (it's very slight but you can see hints of her unbending towards Cole - at one point Cole is all excited because she referred to him as "he" instead of "it" and Viv gets all denialmode). Maybe it's because I'm a type A economics major who has a serious bitchy streak and appreciation for a well cut silhouette and excellently thrown shade, but I can respect the kind of woman Viv is.

 

 

I think it would be interesting for us to also examine how our own prejudices/personalities/world views influence our reactions to specific characters. I will be the first person to admit I'm biased in favor of Viv over Sera because yes, I do have a streak of elitism (I grew up comfortably in a middle-class Asian American household in an intellectual, wealthy suburban neighborhood raised by two parents who both have advanced degrees and I attend one of the world's best liberal arts institutions - I am nothing if not privileged) and given my own personality as I've mentioned in the quoted post~ Viv and I would either be absolute rivals or best friends, whereas I would instinctively look down on Sera and just want nothing to do with her.

 

That doesn't mean that Sera as a character isn't worthy of my respect or doesn't have positive traits - I don't like her abrasive personality or her lack of social finesse, but I appreciate how she does try to help in her own way and, despite all of her rambling about sovereigns et al, there is a strong altruistic streak there. She doesn't have the best character growth in the game, but she does try to understand (now and then) elfy things and magic things before she gets freaked out and flees. And I understand why she is the way she is and I can empathize with that and understand why it is important for me to engage with her perspective.

 

On the other hand, I openly admit my affection/affinity towards Viv usually lets me ignore a lot of her terribleness towards Blackwall and Cole (Cole I do understand though - remember, Viv is a Circle Mage post-Harrowing who thinks Cole is a demon, he scares her as much as magic scares Sera, Viv is just too proud to admit it), esp because I can be just as caustic towards people I don't like (deservedly/undeservedly and there are plenty of people I've disliked undeservedly. we're human, it happens.)

 

Anyways~ I think it's worthwhile to continue this discussion, but I would like to ask everyone to be open about their own prejudices towards Viv as a character rather than being ISPEAKDETRUTHDATEEZABSOLUTE. Our own perspectives and experiences can and should influence our reactions towards fictional characters, but like Brother Genetivi states, we should recognize and acknowledge their role in our perceptions.


  • Maria13, Ieldra, AlleluiaElizabeth et 4 autres aiment ceci

#2
TheJediSaint

TheJediSaint
  • Members
  • 6 637 messages
I think she's hot and condescends with mad style.
  • SharlenaSharlena, Han Shot First, TheLittleBird et 4 autres aiment ceci

#3
AlexiaRevan

AlexiaRevan
  • Members
  • 14 733 messages

why open a new thread ? There is already a Vivi Thread.....



#4
Cecilia

Cecilia
  • Members
  • 235 messages

why open a new thread ? There is already a Vivi Thread.....

 

I've been in the other one and it's really more of a fan-thread - this is really intended to continue the discussion that had overtaken the thread on "boohoo Dorian won't sleep with my ladybits" and is *supposed* to be more critical of how we see Viv as a character and how our own backgrounds influence our perceptions of her.

 

Edit: Though I might be treating this a little bit too much like tumblrasoiaffandom/westeros (oops) and forgetting its really a board about a video game 



#5
Eagle Pusuit

Eagle Pusuit
  • Members
  • 532 messages
The thing that people often seem to take as condescension to me seems like class. She's a classy woman who speaks her mind without apology.
  • SharlenaSharlena et VentiSei aiment ceci

#6
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Vivienne is not absolutely callous; she's not a psychopath. She's just cold, uncaring, and fairly heartless most of the time, but can unbend a bit for people who happen to get close to her. And I say this by her actions and what she approves of, as well as her manner. Also, she was lying outright when she said that her "loyalist" mages had to fight the rebellion; we see plenty of mages who just left it without attacking the rebels. Either she was choosing to side with the templars in their war, or she was lying about fighting the rebellion for some reason.

 

And it's true that she fit into Orlais... but it's also true that she chose to come to Orlais, as her original Circle was in the Free Marches. She chose to seek power in the company of wicked eyes and wicked hearts, and she willingly joined them. I won't give her a pass for doing what's necessary in the Game when it was what she actively wanted and sought out.



#7
Violetbliss

Violetbliss
  • Members
  • 213 messages

I think she isn't complex enough to carry her persona, personally. :/ She does not get enough time to show off herself other than in witty banter, so I never quite believe she has that social prowess everybody touts based on the ingame evidence; especially when the dialogues my character has with her does not allow the character to make any rebuttals or comments to her remarks at any length, even if that would lead to more verbal thrashing. Also, I find her condescension -too obvious- for her implied status - I would have liked more subtlety.



#8
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

I was going to argue the point until I saw who was the dissenter.

 

Here's the golden rule to everything that Xil identifies as "problematic": anything she doesn't personally like. Honestly, just ignore her.  <_<



#9
RinuCZ

RinuCZ
  • Members
  • 565 messages

Vivianne made me uncomfortable because I diagreed with her somewhat rigid attitude towards certain topics and yet she voiced reasonable arguments which made me thinking (e.g. a real long-term effect of completely uncontrolled mages). Her pragmatism is brutal at times and these "Oh dear, but minions want to be used; that is what they are for" kind of answers were painful to listen.

 

She felt like a rational Republican which was some great writing because she never really trigger the urge to ask her to just stop talking.

 

She is basically Javik of Dragon Age, with the exception that she never really tells to Herald that her ideals about free mages and love for everyone is beautiful and she realized that only a moment ago thanks to her journey with Inquisition ;).



#10
XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX

XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX
  • Members
  • 2 518 messages
Meh, Viv isn't that complex, she's more like a panto villain, i like her tho even if her overuse of the word darling gets annoying pretty quickly, has the right opinion about mages too which is a plus

Edit: Ok, i admit i was mostly wrong about the stereotype bit so i removed that part

#11
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Meh, Viv isn't that complex, she's a mix of panto villain & the stereotypical sassy independent black woman who don't need no man, i like her tho even if her overuse of the word darling gets annoying pretty quickly, has the right opinion about mages too which is a plus

 

She's not



#12
XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX

XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX
  • Members
  • 2 518 messages

She's not


She seems like that in some ways tho, although she does need a man i guess since she only has her present power thx to her duke boyfriend

#13
Cespar

Cespar
  • Members
  • 2 954 messages

She seems like that in some ways


How? Besides her being black. -_-
  • XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX aime ceci

#14
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

She seems like that in some ways

 

She is sassy don't get me wrong (which I love that about her lol :P) but for the entire stereotypical black woman she really isn't



#15
Cecilia

Cecilia
  • Members
  • 235 messages

Vivienne is not absolutely callous; she's not a psychopath. She's just cold, uncaring, and fairly heartless most of the time, but can unbend a bit for people who happen to get close to her. And I say this by her actions and what she approves of, as well as her manner. Also, she was lying outright when she said that her "loyalist" mages had to fight the rebellion; we see plenty of mages who just left it without attacking the rebels. Either she was choosing to side with the templars in their war, or she was lying about fighting the rebellion for some reason.

 

And it's true that she fit into Orlais... but it's also true that she chose to come to Orlais, as her original Circle was in the Free Marches. She chose to seek power in the company of wicked eyes and wicked hearts, and she willingly joined them. I won't give her a pass for doing what's necessary in the Game when it was what she actively wanted and sought out.

 

More concrete examples would be helpful. There's very little indication that they "fought" on either side of the rebellion - I think the implication is more along the lines of the loyalist mages refusing to have anything to do with the war and remaining with the Chantry (which means they didn't support the templars, who also rebelled against the Chantry). She never says that she fought the rebellion, simply that she stood against it (this is implied to be politically not militantly) and refused to be harassed into joining it.

 

I think it's worthwhile considering choice within less of an absolute "freedom of choice" spectrum and more within a "working with constraints and incentive patterns" spectrum. As a mage with no background who was in fact discriminated against for the color of her skin, Viv would, theoretically, have had fewer real choices in terms of ways through which she could advance herself and gain greater freedom and power (with which, Cole's banter suggests, she sought to protect herself against being "controlled", having control as the counter to being controlled being a running theme through Viv's character). People do and should bear responsibility for their choices, but I think it's fallible to assume that Viv would have the same spectrum of options as a Trevelyan!mage would have or a non-mage would have.

 

 

I think she isn't complex enough to carry her persona, personally. :/ She does not get enough time to show off herself other than in witty banter, so I never quite believe she has that social prowess everybody touts based on the ingame evidence; especially when the dialogues my character has with her does not allow the character to make any rebuttals or comments to her remarks at any length, even if that would lead to more verbal thrashing. Also, I find her condescension -too obvious- for her implied status - I would have liked more subtlety.

 

I think that's a valid critique - a lot of what I know about her character I've had to build up through bits and pieces of banter and backstory (which is the case for a lot of characters in DA:I) and it's a little frustrating~ It would have felt rewarding to have been able to engage any of them - Solas, Viv, Sera - in more meaningful and extended debates, but limitations of medium (like the lack of dresses and real hair /willstopbeforerant). Overall I thought they did a good job writing Viv, but a lot of their writing for the companions for DA:I was pretty heavyhanded (Sera oh Sera)


  • AlleluiaElizabeth aime ceci

#16
XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX

XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX
  • Members
  • 2 518 messages

She is sassy don't get me wrong (which I love that about her lol :P) but for the entire stereotypical black woman she really isn't


Im 50/50 on her sass, makes her sound too much like a bully in some of the party banter

#17
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

More concrete examples would be helpful. There's very little indication that they "fought" on either side of the rebellion - I think the implication is more along the lines of the loyalist mages refusing to have anything to do with the war and remaining with the Chantry (which means they didn't support the templars, who also rebelled against the Chantry). She never says that she fought the rebellion, simply that she stood against it (this is implied to be politically not militantly) and refused to be harassed into joining it.

 

I think it's worthwhile considering choice within less of an absolute "freedom of choice" spectrum and more within a "working with constraints and incentive patterns" spectrum. As a mage with no background who was in fact discriminated against for the color of her skin, Viv would, theoretically, have had fewer real choices in terms of ways through which she could advance herself and gain greater freedom and power (with which, Cole's banter suggests, she sought to protect herself against being "controlled", having control as the counter to being controlled being a running theme through Viv's character). People do and should bear responsibility for their choices, but I think it's fallible to assume that Viv would have the same spectrum of options as a Trevelyan!mage would have or a non-mage would have.

I'm replaying the game now, so I'll be able to check that dialogue soon, but I think that Vivienne mentioned standing with the templars.

 

And given that the Circle is where elves of all people can reach any position that a human could--up to the point that an elf leads the entirety of the Circle--I find it incredibly unlikely that Vivienne being Rivaini would have barred her from advancement all that much. Especially since a mage Trevelyan can also be black.



#18
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Im 50/50 on her sass, makes her sound too much like a bully in some of the party banter

 

But that's the best part lol :P

 

The Vivienne/Bull banter :D


  • AlleluiaElizabeth et VentiSei aiment ceci

#19
Guest_TrillClinton_*

Guest_TrillClinton_*
  • Guests

Xilizhra, on 17 Feb 2015 - 12:55 PM, said:snapback.png

Personally, I think Vivienne's ethnicity made her even more cringeworthy than her personality already makes her. Having the one black companion in the series being the main advocate for keeping oppressed minorities down strikes me as... problematic.

 

 

....lol



#20
XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX

XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX
  • Members
  • 2 518 messages

But that's the best part lol :P
 
The Vivienne/Bull banter :D


Some are funny, some just sound pointlessly nasty like when she's talking to Blackwall or Sera

#21
WildOrchid

WildOrchid
  • Members
  • 7 256 messages

the stereotypical sassy independent black woman who don't need no man

 

There are lots of white women who are sassy,  independent "and need no man".


  • Fiery Phoenix, Aimi et CrimsonN7 aiment ceci

#22
XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX

XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX
  • Members
  • 2 518 messages

I'm replaying the game now, so I'll be able to check that dialogue soon, but I think that Vivienne mentioned standing with the templars.


I thought Viv just disagreed with the mages deciding to rebel almost immediately after Anders terrorist attack & the assassination attempt on the Divine made normal people's fear of magic higher then it had been since Tevinter's rule

#23
Qun00

Qun00
  • Members
  • 4 393 messages
Personally, I find that characters like Vivienne are more at home in the villain's side, or simply affiliated with a group aside from the protagonist's.

It's odd to have a greedy and vain chunk of ice as one of your companions.

I think it's worthwhile considering choice within less of an absolute "freedom of choice" spectrum and more within a "working with constraints and incentive patterns" spectrum. As a mage with no background who was in fact discriminated against for the color of her skin, Viv would, theoretically, have had fewer real choices in terms of ways through which she could advance herself and gain greater freedom and power (with which, Cole's banter suggests, she sought to protect herself against being "controlled", having control as the counter to being controlled being a running theme through Viv's character). People do and should bear responsibility for their choices, but I think it's fallible to assume that Viv would have the same spectrum of options as a Trevelyan!mage would have or a non-mage would have.


I believe Cassandra is someone that actually aims for moderate freedom, the middle ground.

Vivienne opposes any amount granted to mages as fiercely as would a templar.

#24
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

I thought Viv just disagreed with the mages deciding to rebel almost immediately after Anders terrorist attack & the assassination attempt on the Divine made normal people's fear of magic higher then it had been since Tevinter's rule

 

She did, I also remember her commenting on Barris being what a Templar should be 



#25
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

I thought Viv just disagreed with the mages deciding to rebel almost immediately after Anders terrorist attack & the assassination attempt on the Divine made normal people's fear of magic higher then it had been since Tevinter's rule

Specifically because of the templar crackdown in response. Did she miss that cause somehow?