Your hard disk could be spying on you........Thanks USA
#76
Guest_E-Ro_*
Posté 19 février 2015 - 06:29
Guest_E-Ro_*
First of all, the government already controls you. They do not need to look at the embarrassing porn you downloaded to blackmail you or anything like that. At any given moment they can have a few guys bust into your house waving guns, they dont need to check your hdd for that.
Second, there is a VERY real need for mass surveillance in the 21st century. Get over it.
- bEVEsthda aime ceci
#77
Guest_E-Ro_*
Posté 19 février 2015 - 06:32
Guest_E-Ro_*
This comment makes no sense. The internet dis not exist when the bill of rights was drafted.Furthermore nothing is being seized, its the internet, which no one owns.uh oh! if you are an American Citizen looks like some body needs to go back to school.
Read A little thing called the Bill of rights, #4 on that list might really interest you.
- bEVEsthda aime ceci
#78
Posté 19 février 2015 - 06:33
MAXIM OF THE DAY:
ALWAYS DO YOUR IMPORTANT WORK ON A PC THAT NEVER BEEN CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET AND WON'T EVER BE.
#79
Posté 19 février 2015 - 06:34
Hope they enjoy my anime collection.
Hmm, maybe I should apply for US citizenship and then work for them. I can't imagine a better job that being paid to access and thoroughly investigate other people's anime collections. I guess some people possibly having bad taste would be a profession hazard though ...
MAXIM OF THE DAY:
ALWAYS DO YOUR IMPORTANT WORK ON A PC THAT NEVER BEEN CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET AND WON'T EVER BE.
Meh, I prefer storing my nuclear fission device blueprints and my 9001 step program to ascertain world domination in classic dead-tree form in the basement.
- Kaiser Arian XVII aime ceci
#80
Posté 19 février 2015 - 06:34
Haaaai Obama!
#81
Posté 20 février 2015 - 12:06
Hope they enjoy my anime collection.
Hmm, maybe I should apply for US citizenship and then work for them. I can't imagine a better job that being paid to access and thoroughly investigate other people's anime collections. I guess some people possibly having bad taste would be a profession hazard though ...
That's putting it lightly. The people they'd have you searching through are the sort who hide imbedded messages videos inside child porn.
- Dermain aime ceci
#82
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 20 février 2015 - 12:08
Guest_simfamUP_*
All they're gonna find is a lot of bookmarked porn.
- DrBlingzle aime ceci
#83
Posté 20 février 2015 - 12:09
wow thats a lot of childporn to watch.
#84
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Posté 20 février 2015 - 12:18
Guest_TrillClinton_*
MAXIM OF THE DAY:
ALWAYS DO YOUR IMPORTANT WORK ON A PC THAT NEVER BEEN CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET AND WON'T EVER BE.
Or you can just install gentoo and wget every web page
#85
Posté 20 février 2015 - 01:09
Or you can just install gentoo and wget every web page
Not that wget would protect your computer from the interweb traps, of course. The most dangerous point of contact with the internet is the fact that you connect to it at all, not how you do it or via which proxy. Once you connect, no matter how briefly, you've risked being compromised to something that will subvert all other defenses.
The closest thing to absolute anonyminity on the net is to use TOR and the Dark Net, and even that's not foolproof (as the silk road bust showed).
#86
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Posté 20 février 2015 - 01:10
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Not that wget would protect your computer from the interweb traps, of course. The most dangerous point of contact with the internet is the fact that you connect to it at all, not how you do it or via which proxy. Once you connect, no matter how briefly, you've risked being compromised to something that will subvert all other defenses.
The closest thing to absolute anonyminity on the net is to use TOR and the Dark Net, and even that's not foolproof (as the silk road bust showed).
It was a Richard Stallman joke.
Also, wget would cancel out the javascript that runs in the background and relies on static web pages. No DOM Manipulation languages =/= no web execution.
#87
Posté 20 février 2015 - 01:36
Second, there is a VERY real need for mass surveillance in the 21st century. Get over it.
What is this real need? Not the "terrorism boogeyman" or the "pedo boogeyman" is it?
#88
Posté 20 février 2015 - 01:37
What is this real need? Not the "terrorism boogeyman" or the "pedo boogeyman" is it?
To turn people into hyper-paranoid conspiracy theorists that provide entertainment for everyone else.
- The Devlish Redhead aime ceci
#89
Posté 20 février 2015 - 01:41
#90
Posté 20 février 2015 - 01:48
Also, wget would cancel out the javascript that runs in the background and relies on static web pages. No DOM Manipulation languages =/= no web execution.
Which, as web security goes, is a bit like a teacher boasting that they wear a condom when teaching before a class of children. While that is, objectively, safer than the alternative, it's not exactly reassuring or offsetting the host of other potential problems in that scenario.
#91
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Posté 20 février 2015 - 02:01
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Which, as web security goes, is a bit like a teacher boasting that they wear a condom when teaching before a class of children. While that is, objectively, safer than the alternative, it's not exactly reassuring or offsetting the host of other potential problems in that scenario.
Oh most definitely, like I said it was a Richard Stall-man joke. You cannot however deny that rejecting all javascript execution would add another layer of security. With the complexity of web applications combined with how accessible current technology to run closer to metal, disabling javascript would add another layer of security. http://ejohn.org/blo...compile-target/
At this moment, you are taking away part of the power of these web applications. Also, security isn't a "one solution solves" all problem. Scenario a) You cancel out a connection to the internet and one day you use a USB drive which executes a program that has an embedded worm that sniffs your drive for data. Which is not unlikely but would just take time and would probably be caught by any virus scan, analyzing processes in the memory space.
1) It was a Richard Stallman joke because that is the way he browses the web as he is paranoid about any closed source application.

2)Although it was a joke, disabling of javascript can also be part of the security measure as it dissallowes code execution.
3) Security is a whole suite of problems rather than a one "catch all" issue.
#92
Posté 20 février 2015 - 02:07
Still not concerned, nothing on my hard drive worthwhile. If something is very important/sensitive don't save it on a PC connected to the internet.
#93
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Posté 20 février 2015 - 02:08
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Still not concerned, nothing on my hard drive worthwhile. If something is very important/sensitive don't save it on a PC connected to the internet.
This is why you only keep your pony filth in a RAM based database?
Sneaky devil
#94
Posté 20 février 2015 - 05:06
Anyone els getting turned on?
#95
Guest_E-Ro_*
Posté 20 février 2015 - 04:53
Guest_E-Ro_*
Any kind of crime really. Doesn't have to be as huge or dramatic as terrorism.What is this real need? Not the "terrorism boogeyman" or the "pedo boogeyman" is it?
- bEVEsthda aime ceci
#96
Posté 20 février 2015 - 06:06
They aren't really relying on manpower, instead they rely on almost two miles of super computers at the Utah facility. Is it effective? I have no idea but, it does disgust me.
Did you hear the reasoning they gave for building the facility in Utah?
They claimed it was because that location had a lot of water to cool all the equipment that would be running nonstop.
I don't think they ever took the time to think about this. Utah is a desert. There are mandatory water rationing going on there because there isn't much water. By that I mean you can only water the lawn certain days of the week and not every day.
#97
Posté 21 février 2015 - 01:59
Any kind of crime really. Doesn't have to be as huge or dramatic as terrorism.
So because of crime we need this........ No we don't. One good reason why we need this beyond ordinary police or agencies doing the job they are paid to do..
#98
Posté 21 février 2015 - 02:00
Did you hear the reasoning they gave for building the facility in Utah?
They claimed it was because that location had a lot of water to cool all the equipment that would be running nonstop.
I don't think they ever took the time to think about this. Utah is a desert. There are mandatory water rationing going on there because there isn't much water. By that I mean you can only water the lawn certain days of the week and not every day.
The data centre is going to have its own private water supply and a lot of recirculation
#99
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Posté 21 février 2015 - 02:03
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Post your face when operation kim kardassian breaks the internet
#100
Posté 21 février 2015 - 02:55
I am okay with this.
I've been pretty selfish and have been keeping porn to myself, it is only fair that it gets out there and evenly distributed on the internet.
Here guys and gals, have at some of it:
- Isichar et DrBlingzle aiment ceci





Retour en haut










