https://www.youtube....h?v=qyvIif2YL9o
here's the sargon video on it.
That's so messed up......... And how did she get off on charges?
https://www.youtube....h?v=qyvIif2YL9o
here's the sargon video on it.
That's so messed up......... And how did she get off on charges?
Patriarchy i suppose.
You carch the bit whare the cops appologised to her?
So can men... Seems to me every group who feels disadvantaged at some point can play the victim. You could say she would have been convicted if she were black. Or if she were a muslim. Or obese. Or ugly. There are a lot of potential factors that can help or complicate one's chances to get away with something. I don't think this particular case lends itself so well for women vs. men, though, or for the claim that women like to play the victim.
Oh, I see. So that's what your long post on double standards was about? Boys apparently not being allowed to join the game a group of girls are playing, while girls can join a boy game? Real abuse of power right there. Dictators can learn something from that.
ok so 1st thing
Yeah i agree almost every one online is a whiny git. regardless of gender race and religion.
but the fact is she got away from haveing sex whith a child. dosnt matter the genders. sex whith a minor is a crime.
2.
that was a joke. look up about 90% of my posts.
the point was that how you pee is and should not be an advantage.
Show i got to be a Colnel in Nam.
Yeah, because double standards
Guest_E-Ro_*
A few teachers from my school were like that. After I left, of course.
It's okay though, 'cause they were total uggos,
I'll make this simple case for why this is not a crime, but if the genders were reversed, it would be. Say in that very classroom, an anonymous yes or no vote were taken. The decision the vote concerns is whether the female teacher will sleep with a randomly chosen boy in the class. Only the boys vote. Obviously, most, but not all of these young men are going to be straight, still the result of that vote will without question be 'yes'.
Reversed, the vote will just as assuredly be 'no'. In fact, if the teacher were a man, and both sexes were included in the vote and the result (sleeping with the teacher), the vote would still be no. I'll admit, if the teacher were female and both sexes were included in the vote and the result, the vote would become infinitely more difficult to predict, but that proves the point. Sex IS very different for women than for men, regardless of orientation. Equality and sameness are not the same thing.
Regardless of the teacher's gender, a teenaged female, of any orientation, that engages in sexual conduct with a teacher, willingly or otherwise, has a better chance than not of enduring traumatic emotional scarring. For a teenaged male, the likelihood is considerably diminished If the the boy does so willingly and the teacher is of his preferred orientation.
Your reffereing to how men perceve memmory of events regarding women.
thats how we got that fluff 1 in 5 BS. when if i recall in 2014 the figures are about 1 in47 to 49 to 1 in 70 for men.
i dont have the exact figures.
omg something just hit me.What if we all went to jail together!!!? for like five years, in a special jail only for bsn people. would we all come out hating each other or like bffs? or would we all just be insane?
I will post this on every America hating thread (or even enhance it).
Well USA should be compared with Brazil, China and Russia, not with Denmark and Sweden. Because population and extent are big factors here.
For example in Brazil things are much worse than USA (You already know about China and Russia):
Brazil Hell Yeah!
I wish the anti-USA things appearing in threads like these could consist of useless memes as well.
*Warning,link shows extreme police brutality*.www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-0uqFTBclo
One, three, five events like this.. you'd skip with " huh, well, that's fubar" When goddamned YOUTUBE VIDEOS of this stuff are becoming commonplace, it makes an awesome moment to start wondering.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Regardless of the teacher's gender, a teenaged female, of any orientation, that engages in sexual conduct with a teacher, willingly or otherwise, has a better chance than not of enduring traumatic emotional scarring. For a teenaged male, the likelihood is considerably diminished If the the boy does so willingly and the teacher is of his preferred orientation.
It sounds like for the female side, you're including consent and non-consent, while for the male side you're only including consent.
Of course it will be more traumatic and emotionally scarring, it's rape, compared to it not being rape (not talking about statuary here).
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Of course he would be. The justice system is so dam corrupt, broken and bias it's not even funny anymore.
yah know what i think. we should lock up anyone who wants to work whith kids. just to be sure.
I am sorry if I offend someone. But each time i hear about that double standard. I can't think about anything but..

It's like 50 shade of grey. More like 50 Shade of being ridiculously rich. It's a porno about money.
Iprefere the i have breasts one myself.
Patriarchy i suppose.
You carch the bit whare the cops appologised to her?
No because the audio wasn't that great.
There is hordes of cruel/abusive male teachers sentenced into prison right now. @the jobless, So it's the time to get their jobs.
I'll make this simple case for why this is not a crime, but if the genders were reversed, it would be. Say in that very classroom, an anonymous yes or no vote were taken. The decision the vote concerns is whether the female teacher will sleep with a randomly chosen boy in the class. Only the boys vote. Obviously, most, but not all of these young men are going to be straight, still the result of that vote will without question be 'yes'.
Reversed, the vote will just as assuredly be 'no'. In fact, if the teacher were a man, and both sexes were included in the vote and the result (sleeping with the teacher), the vote would still be no. I'll admit, if the teacher were female and both sexes were included in the vote and the result, the vote would become infinitely more difficult to predict, but that proves the point. Sex IS very different for women than for men, regardless of orientation. Equality and sameness are not the same thing.
Regardless of the teacher's gender, a teenaged female, of any orientation, that engages in sexual conduct with a teacher, willingly or otherwise, has a better chance than not of enduring traumatic emotional scarring. For a teenaged male, the likelihood is considerably diminished If the the boy does so willingly and the teacher is of his preferred orientation.
bs. A teacher having sex with their student is a crime, gender means nothing at all. This women should have been imprisoned and she would have been if she was male. That is the issue. This is very common and it's frankly bs. A crime is a crime.
Guest_Puddi III_*
Of course it will be more traumatic and emotionally scarring, it's rape, compared to it not being rape (not talking about statuary here).
I imagine statuary rape would be more traumatic for the rapist than the statuary.
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
I imagine statuary rape would be more traumatic for the rapist than the statuary.
" Nice"
Justice isn't same for different people in US.
Wealth, position, fame, race, charisma and gender dictate how illegal your act was, not the act itself.
What about the MRA movement?
omg something just hit me.
What if we all went to jail together!!!? for like five years, in a special jail only for bsn people. would we all come out hating each other or like bffs? or would we all just be insane?
All fun and games until we start putting in a pecking order.