I don't know. The Reaper AI God did give Shepard choices at the end for some reason.
And if you ask me, this is probably the most non plausible part of the ending.(which makes very little sense as it is)
Why would a god ask an insect what it thinks is the right solution?
No matter what, letting Shepard choose Destroy for example, went against everything the catalyst stands for.
Because according to it, another synthetic uprising was just a matter of time.
Calling for a Reaper retreat - maybe. Agreeing to destroy itself and all the races it "preserved"?
That's a new level of mind boggling anti-logic.
Control is not much better in this regard.
YOu see the problem I have, then. It all sucks.
I never claimed that I liked ME3's ending in any way shape and form...
And that's when Bioware flips you the bird for daring to disagree.
In this case I kind of agree with BW.
Because if these are the choices you face, you can't afford to get angry. Get even. Choose the lesser evil.
You can't get everyone killed out of spite.
I mean, Shepard could have chose to discount the crucible idea, and to push for using the every resource for building Ark ships for the continuation of the species and as much anti-reaper super-dreadnaughts as they can build.
The war would have been lost of course no matter what, but the reapers would have paid a heavy price,
and some races may have managed to survive for the next cycle.
(the thing is - for all you know, this could have all happened at some distant point in the past - races surviving for more than one cycle - but the Reapers are still here, so...)
Retour en haut
