Aller au contenu

Photo

An argument can be made that DAMP is better than MEMP


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
108 réponses à ce sujet

#101
SpaceV3gan

SpaceV3gan
  • Members
  • 2 379 messages

Geth Juggernaut

 

I like my Juggy as a power caster, too. Siege Pulse Spam for Fire Explosions and Tech Bursts all day.

 

Probably worth noting that ME3 also has more satisfying melee combat.

Nothing beats Hatersurf for pure melee satisfaction!


  • CitizenThom et Cette aiment ceci

#102
silencekills

silencekills
  • Members
  • 1 207 messages

I am absolutely right about just a couple guns. Sure you can choose from many but you can only carry two into the battle, a primary and a secondary.   If you like shooting guns then thats great. My only argument here is that if you are burned out on shooting games, and appreciate different attacks and animations/effects than DAMP could be a worthy alternative.

 

...so in DAMP you only get one weapon and 4 special moves that you spam and that's it?

 

Ok, if we're going to put it that way, both of these games are complete trash.

 

But that isn't giving either the credit they deserve, is it?

 

Also: the rest of you need to stop talking about ME3MP. You're making me nostalgic. D;



#103
BackdoorPaco

BackdoorPaco
  • Members
  • 358 messages

Nostalgia thread?

Nostalgia thread.


  • Robbiesan, CitizenThom, veramis et 3 autres aiment ceci

#104
SpaceV3gan

SpaceV3gan
  • Members
  • 2 379 messages

^ So all of that took place in one Bronze match? All that Hatesurf Falcon Punch Batarian scum dressed in pink?

What a game ME3MP is...



#105
Shahadem

Shahadem
  • Members
  • 1 389 messages

I loved the mass effect multiplayer a lot, but before I played it I was burned out on shooting guns. Every video game I played I was shooting some type of gun.  What I like about DAMP is that it has that same deep class and skill mechanic, but you're not shooting any guns or cannons.  There's certainly room to add more maps and things, but the battle mechanics are very good as they are, and arguable more fun than MEMP.

 

Instead of shooting guns you are shooting swords. Only you have even less control over your character's actions now. At least in ME3MP you were able to control where your gun hit, whether you dodged, and basically everything else. In DA:IMP you can only interact with the game on the most basic of level.


  • SpaceV3gan et Cryos_Feron aiment ceci

#106
Shahadem

Shahadem
  • Members
  • 1 389 messages

ME1 was much more RPG, and i personally liked it much more than ME3 single player.  

 

ME3MP was very well done as a "shooter" though, which had a variety of play styles in the one game:  playing like a 3rd person cover shooter was viable;  playing like a non-cover 3rd person shooter (right hand advantage, run n gun) was viable;  playing melee characters was viable;  playing space-magic characters was viable.

 

On platinum it was more optimal for the team to go all biotics (re: interference) or all tech, with guns mostly doing damage, but on gold or lower you could definitely play it without shooting guns at all.  Not a pure shooter IMO.

 

 

I suppose you could argue DAMP is a shooter too  ;) given ranged outpaces melee.

 

I couldn't agree more, especially about ME1 being better than ME3 since it was more about using abilities and less about shooting.


  • Zorinho20_CRO aime ceci

#107
Zorinho20_CRO

Zorinho20_CRO
  • Members
  • 3 252 messages

I couldn't agree more, especially about ME1 being better than ME3 since it was more about using abilities and less about shooting.

You get a like for using that cute Aerie avatar.



#108
SpaceV3gan

SpaceV3gan
  • Members
  • 2 379 messages

I couldn't agree more, especially about ME1 being better than ME3 since it was more about using abilities and less about shooting.

 

A high level Adept (Singleplayer) will virtually never have to shoot in ME1 nor in ME3, whille a Soldier can play the entire ME1 as a pure shooter but rely on some abilities in ME3.



#109
BraveLToaster

BraveLToaster
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages

A high level Adept (Singleplayer) will virtually never have to shoot in ME1 nor in ME3, whille a Soldier can play the entire ME1 as a pure shooter but rely on some abilities in ME3.

This is definitely true.  Guns were just as OP as abilities in ME1.

 

The difference in ME1 was that everything became so OP that you could focus on one thing and ignore everything else without running into trouble.