1056 réponses à ce sujet

[Abraham_uk]

So. What have we learnt from this thread?

[Vanth]

Yeah. Attracted. As in wanting something or somebody.
 
Are you illiterate or do you somehow not know what that word entails?

A hardon is a pretty clear sign of attraction.

I notice you are getting abusive. Is that because you are losing the argument?

[Captain Wiseass]

bah stop trolling, s/he clearly wanted to say that "if you're excited by a thought of having sexual intercourse with same gender you're either gay or bisexual"

LYING

[o Ventus]

bah stop trolling, s/he clearly wanted to say that "if you're excited by a thought of sexual intercourse with same gender you're either gay or bisexual"

I guess you haven't been paying attention to the conversation then.

 

That, or you're as deluded and unaware as the person you're defending.

[Captain Wiseass]

So. What have we learnt from this thread?

That I need to drink more.

[Lord Surinen]

 

Abandonement of domination would be a terrific regress. People who rise above, rise above other people.

 

 

Ghandi, Buddha, Adam Smith, Albert Einstein, Mark Twain, Martin Luther King, Thomas Paine, Virgil, Homer, the Wright brothers, Charles Darwin, Nelson Mandela, Isaac Newton Buffy the goddamn Vampire Slayer.

 

"Domination" has nothing to do with being great.

 

Also, let's be clear.  You aren't, and never have been, talking about making things better for your hypothetical progeny or anyone else.  You want a bride that you can control.  You want someone who has to submit to your every whim, and that's it.  There is nothing great about that.

 

 

Empathy is a biggest sin of all.

 

 

Empathy is a defining trait of humanity.  Empathy or sin, you are obviously confused about the meaning of one of them.

 

Sorry, at this point I'm unable to continue this discussion. We have ventured into real life a little bit too far. All these mentioned people, well, history has its mysteries.

 

I have mentioned it multiple times in fact. Arranged marriage---> breeding, keeping a superior line grow and prosper.

 

I don't think so.

 

*goes look* oh yeah, definitely true.

 

 

Dare I ask of what?

of what you have said

This wasn't even a thought, let alone an answer.

A phantom then, maybe.

As I'm certain others have noted earlier in the thread, toggle won't happen, will never happen, isn't a good option. It would be more productive to either avoid the content you don't like or find a different game without all that awful progress and empathy.

I would like it to happen. While I take people' notices into the deepest corners of my heart, I don't use them as guide. Productive would be to actually engage in production of alternatives.

[papercut_ninja]

bah stop trolling, s/he clearly wanted to say that "if you're excited by a thought of having sexual intercourse with same gender you're either gay or bisexual"

 

...

 

Not directly (since it is a bit difficult on a forum) but we can have a thought experiment.

Imagine taking a self claime "straight" guy. Strip him and sit him on a chair. Put a blindfold on him. Now bring in a gay man who then gives the straight man a ******. If the straight guy becomes sexually excited he isn't really straight but is really bi.

Simple.

[Abraham_uk]

That I need to drink more.

 

[Vanth]

"Her ***** got wet, that means she was sexually attracted to me, that means it wasn't rape!"

Go play in traffic.

Don't be such a moron. It is rape if it is nonconsensual which has nothing to do with attraction or arousal.

[TBJack]

yet you're still trying to win over him in this argument, in other words dominate over him psychically. Which kinda proves him right. But I think you two have different understanding of the word "dominate".

 

No, disagreeing with someone is not attempting to dominate them, psychically or otherwise.  Domination is putting someone or something in a position where you have power over them and then using that power as a means of control.  Even if I were to convince him that I were correct, that would mean that we agreed, not that I had any form of power over him.

 

As for our understanding of the word dominate, as far as I can tell we more or less agree on the definition, we simply disagree on the concept's application.

 

Also, although I don't think you meant any insult, I don't appreciate having my disagreeing with him compared to his assertions that the subjugation of another human being is to be lauded.

[Alan Rickman]

So. What have we learnt from this thread?

 

Absolutely nothing. In fact, I've started to forget things I used to know before I started reading this thread.

[Boogielicious]

I notice you are getting abusive. Is that because you are losing the argument?

 

I notice you are trolling.  Is that because you are bored/twelve?

[o Ventus]

A hardon is a pretty clear sign of attraction.

I notice you are getting abusive. Is that because you are losing the argument?

Well, you were able to formulate a coherent response to my post, so you're not illiterate. Thus, I conclude that you don't know what the word "attraction" means.

 

Having a hard d**k is a sign of physical stimulation, not attraction. Of course, I'm not an idiot, so I can make the distinction.

 

"She was wet when I f**ked her! I swear! I mean, yeah I drugged and blindfolded her, but it's not rape if she's wet!"

[xkg]

Not directly (since it is a bit difficult on a forum) but we can have a thought experiment.

Imagine taking a self claime "straight" guy. Strip him and sit him on a chair. Put a blindfold on him. Now bring in a gay man who then gives the straight man a ******. If the straight guy becomes sexually excited he isn't really straight but is really bi.

Simple.

 

 

According to your testing method, what is your definition for sexuality of people with, for example, ED

Are they asexual ? 

[FKA_Servo]

So. What have we learnt from this thread?

 

That it's a day ending in "Y" on the BSN.

[Captain Wiseass]

Don't be such a moron. It is rape if it is nonconsensual which has nothing to do with attraction or arousal.

Your thought experiment is the definition of nonconsensual. But you know that, since you're a troll. (Hint: If you want to hide it, don't ask someone if they're mad, bro.)

 

Done with you.

[Lady Artifice]

The only example I can think of is from Amercan Dad when they spoofed the Fast and Furious movies, joking that the mild homoerotic subtext is actually because the entire franchise is written and filmed as a gay porno, then edited down to an audience-friendly version... except in France, who get it uncut?

 

I think people are confusing reality with Seth MacFarlane cartoons again? I made that mistake once when I got into a fight with a guy in a Big Bird costume, that didn't end up being half as funny as the Giant Chicken Fights would have you believe...

 

 

Out of likes.

 

But I'm glad to know you're lurking around.

 

Spoiler

 

[Vanth]

 
"She was wet when I f**ked her! I swear! I mean, yeah I drugged and blindfolded her, but it's not rape if she's wet!"

*sigh* another moron.

[ThreeF]

So. What have we learnt from this thread?

nothing.

 

 

of what you have said

I've already said it, it's under the TBJack's quote in the same post that was addressed to you (which you quoted),

[Hanako Ikezawa]

 

Don't be such a moron. It is rape if it is nonconsensual which has nothing to do with attraction or arousal.

Funny, since your evidence of proving bisexuality was a case of something that can only be called rape. 

 

Not directly (since it is a bit difficult on a forum) but we can have a thought experiment.

Imagine taking a self claime "straight" guy. Strip him and sit him on a chair. Put a blindfold on him. Now bring in a gay man who then gives the straight man a ******. If the straight guy becomes sexually excited he isn't really straight but is really bi.

Simple.

 

So you just admitted your evidence is not evidence. 

[TBJack]

A man can get an erection from a light breeze hitting his crotch the wrong way, that doesn't mean he wants to f**k the atmosphere, or whatever weird logic you would claim.

 

Remember everyone, reach for the sky!  Then f*** it!

[Lord Surinen]

You want a toggle-able gay/straight option?

Yes, please, I would like it. If there are toggle gore options in some games, then for such content like this it should be even more present.

[o Ventus]

*sigh* another moron.

Coming from the person who says that erection = attraction.

 

You may as well be claiming that the Earth is actually hollow and that there's an advanced civilization of mole people in the center, because it makes just as much sense as the sh*t you're spewing.

[Meave]

I guess you haven't been paying attention to the conversation then.

 

That, or you're as deluded and unaware as the person you're defending.

 

one thing is saying that s/he's wrong, other is pretending that what s/he said makes no sense. Bear in mind not everyone here speaks English flawlessly. But if you do that on purpose it's classified as trolling

[Sifr]

I do realise it. I have never said that everyone has an uptitude to aspire to ****** superior level of consciousness, but all healthy men can go far with their nature thirst for domination. While yes, these are characteristics of a psychopath, it is not exclusively attached to them. I have mentiond offspring for a reason.

 

Except that domination of others is, by it's very nature, an unhealthy attitude.

 

While there's nothing wrong with being a psychopath and many psychopathinc individuals function within society with no problems whatsoever, to the point they're not even recognised as having the disorder, it is nonetheless a concern when those who lie on more extreme end of the bell-curve, who's symptoms and delusions of grandeur can interfere in both their own mental health, well-being and the well-being of others?

 

As for your point about offspring... well, I'm not going to bring children into this because otherwise we might end up offending people? Best avoid that, as we've already got more than enough being discussed already, eh?