In the end, this all comes down to whether you consider having npcs whose character development is also -among other things, of course- based on their sexuality or having every romance option available to each of your pcs as more important.
An idea for all sexual preferences
#151
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:15
- Tayah, daveliam et Grieving Natashina aiment ceci
#152
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:18
In the end, this all comes down to whether you consider having npcs whose character development is also -among other things, of course- based on their sexuality or having every romance option available to each of your pcs as more important.
I know we don't agree often, but call this an honorary like until I get some back. That was very well said. ![]()
- Tayah, daveliam et TevinterSupremacist aiment ceci
#153
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:18
Why did I agree to come here?![]()
- daveliam aime ceci
#154
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:21
And again, you're the only one saying that no one is allowed to disagree with you.
Answer me this, why is no one allowed to disagree with you? Why is no one else allowed to share their opinions?
If the majority of posters here disagree with me, I am flamed and called a troll.....
#155
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:23
I know we don't agree often, but call this an honorary like until I get some back. That was very well said.
Oh come on...do we disagree that often?
....to be honest, I think we used to disagree on the swtor forums too, long ago when I was still subbed to that...thing...I mean, I could be mistaken, but I think I remember your username and since that was a bioware game too...I obviously had a different one there though ![]()
#156
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:25
I say after reading all the posts here, wipe out the romances all together.
Took much political correctness, among other things.
Just focus on Dragon Age, Blight, Dark Spawn, Wardens, Brood Mother, The Architect, Teventer, Quinari, Solas from Flemeth, etc.
The romance is too much a hot topic, political and just not worth it anymore.
#157
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:26
Let's not have a "remove the gay" button. ![]()
You can already romance whoever you want, just roll a different character.
Saying its about "choice" is an awful argument. By that logic, you should be able "choose" to make Sera love elves, or make Cassandra hate romance books, or make Vivienne anti-circle to meet your preference. The entire point of games like this is the characters, you can't just start stripping away their identity because it doesn't meet your approval. You don't have characters anymore if you do that.
#158
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:26
If the majority of posters here disagree with me, I am flamed and called a troll.....
No, you are flamed and called a troll because when the majority of the posters disagreed with you, you started whining about how it's "too PC" and "what happened to freedom of speech" and "I guess this isn't a democracy anymore" and blah, blah, blah. Before you pulled that troll behavior, we were mostly treating you like a regular poster. Just go back to page 1 and double check. You'll see.
- Leo, Tayah, Dirthamen et 7 autres aiment ceci
#159
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:26
I don't think you're allowed to take the playground's ball and go home, dude.
- Andraste_Reborn, daveliam et Dirthamen aiment ceci
#160
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:28
Oh come on...do we disagree that often?
....to be honest, I think we used to disagree on the swtor forums too, long ago when I was still subbed to that...thing...I mean, I could be mistaken, but I think I remember your username and since that was a bioware game too...I obviously had a different one there though
Wow. I was wondering how long that would take. I changed my BSN name to Natashina last year, so I knew this was gonna come up. ![]()
Yeah, the same natashina from the SWTOR forums is the same one you're talking to now. Purple text, ruffled a lot of feathers back then. Zero regrets too, would do it all over again.
I meant what I said then. Once the answer came, I walked away and no longer pushed the subject.
Absolutely you and I disagree a lot. However, you've never been a troll or a jerk to me. The few times we do butt heads, we do in a way to try to understand the other's point. We might not agree on the point, but we walk away with respect. 'Bout all you can ask. We also remember that no matter how much we like DA, it's just a video game series at the end of the day.
#161
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:29
Never said to have a remove a gay bottom, toggle on and off switch, etc. You guys all said that to flame it up.
I only said play as a straight character, gay character or random mix (3 choices) but we all should have the right and option to chose which of these settings we want.
That's all it was for me but that's not acceptable either.
- Brevnau aime ceci
#162
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:29
In the end, this all comes down to whether you consider having npcs whose character development is also -among other things, of course- based on their sexuality or having every romance option available to each of your pcs as more important.
I think this is the crux of the issue, and the thing that divides opinion on this particular topic.
Personally, I see the merits of both sides. I don't consider a character having a fluid sexuality which can change from one playthrough to the next to be detrimental to their integrity as a character. Conversely, I don't consider a character having a fixed sexuality which is consistent between playthroughs to be detrimental to their integrity as a character.
#163
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:31
I say after reading all the posts here, wipe out the romances all together.
Took much political correctness, among other things.
Just focus on Dragon Age, Blight, Dark Spawn, Wardens, Brood Mother, The Architect, Teventer, Quinari, Solas from Flemeth, etc.
The romance is too much a hot topic, political and just not worth it anymore.
Yeah, because you made a thread where you said "Let's have the option to make a world where homosexuals don't exist!" What did you think was gonna happen?
You lit a fire, threw gasoline on it, then are surprised when rages out of control?
#164
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:33
When you start up DAI, you have three options:
(01) Straight game play
(02) random mix
(03) gay game play
This way, if someone likes to only play as a straight character, the game's characters would be straight.
Or if someone is gay, they can play as a gay character and the games characters would be gay.
Or some would rather have a random mix and see what they'd get.
This would solve all the hoopla about sex sex sex. No more complaints about male and female straight gamers saying, I want to romance her or him but they're gay.
Or gay players who want to romance a certain female or male and they can't becasue they're straight.
Would this not work?
And we instead can focus on fixing the many bugs in DAI. Like CTD's......sluggish frame rates, etc.
.......where to begin.....
- daveliam aime ceci
#165
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:34
Never said to have a remove a gay bottom, toggle on and off switch, etc. You guys all said that to flame it up.
I only said play as a straight character, gay character or random mix (3 choices) but we all should have the right and option to chose which of these settings we want.
That's all it was for me but that's not acceptable either.
You have that option! Don't want a gay Inquisitor? Don't romance someone of the same sex!
- actionhero112 et ComedicSociopathy aiment ceci
#166
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:35
Yeah, because you made a thread where you said "Let's have the option to make a world where homosexuals don't exist!" What did you think was gonna happen?
You lit a fire, threw gasoline on it, then are surprised when rages out of control?
You need to look at the plus side. Imagine being able to pick your sexual orientation as "gay", then all of a sudden your Dragon Age experiences caters to your sexual preference PERFECTLY. Wouldn't you like that? Imagine 20% of the in game population being gay for example. Imagine having npc's that understand all the hardships you've gone through, what it's like to be gay, etc. Imagine a men only brothel, wouldn't you like that?
You must understand that people buy these games and they come home and want to escape into a fantasy world.
Keyword: Fantasy
Do you want someone elses fantasy forced on to you or do you want your own?
#168
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:36
Yeah, because you made a thread where you said "Let's have the option to make a world where homosexuals don't exist!" What did you think was gonna happen?
You lit a fire, threw gasoline on it, then are surprised when rages out of control?
I don't think OP believes having an option to erase homosexuality from romanceable companions is something questionable, if you also add an option to erase heterosexuality.
#169
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:37
Yeah, because you made a thread where you said "Let's have the option to make a world where homosexuals don't exist!" What did you think was gonna happen?
You lit a fire, threw gasoline on it, then are surprised when rages out of control?
No, you said that. Yet another flamer to blow this way out of proportion.
I said have three choices.
Play as a straight character with those relationships and romances
Play as a gay character with those relationships and romances
Or have a random mix
No where does this exclude gay, straight permanently out for anyone. It's how we want to play DAI based on our choice. And how we want to play DAI is no ones business but our own.
#170
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:38
Never said to have a remove a gay bottom, toggle on and off switch, etc. You guys all said that to flame it up.
I only said play as a straight character, gay character or random mix (3 choices) but we all should have the right and option to chose which of these settings we want.
That's all it was for me but that's not acceptable either.
Or could... you know roleplay
Like if you want to play a straight character, romance the characters that are available to that gender
#171
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:40
The wine. Start with the wine, then go from there.

#172
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:41
I don't think OP believes having an option to erase homosexuality from romanceable companions is something questionable, if you also add an option to erase heterosexuality.
I suppose that is more reasonable of him than most people who suggest a gay toggle, however I value actual queer characters over getting to bang every guy in the game. Yeah, romancing Cullen as a guy would be nice, but it's not worth de-gaying Dorian and Sera.
#173
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:42
No, you said that. Yet another flamer to blow this way out of proportion.
I said have three choices.
Play as a straight character with those relationships and romances
Play as a gay character with those relationships and romances
Or have a random mix
No where does this exclude gay, straight permanently out for anyone. It's how we want to play DAI based on our choice. And how we want to play DAI is no ones business but our own.
Really?
This way, if someone likes to only play as a straight character, the game's characters would be straight.
Your exact words from the first post. You can see where the confusion comes from.
#174
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:42
Or could... you know roleplay
Like if you want to play a straight character, romance the characters that are available to that gender
Some folks think it just rains the money it would take do things like this.
Hell, forget any sort of arguments about story or the like. Who is going to pay for this? Who's gonna pay the artist team to get all of the animation scenes looking right and not awkward for the LIs? The tons of extra dialogue? The tons of story changes, additions and subtractions it would take to accomplish those three modes of gameplay he's proposing? The very deep levels of coding it would take to make sure nothing breaks?
That is not cheap. So, I'd like to hear how the OP intends to pay for his "solution." Even EA's resources aren't infinite.
#175
Posté 26 février 2015 - 11:44
Having to program that kind of thing alone would be a huge pain in the ass I imagine and most likely have all kinds of issues that would render it pointless or way to broken to be useful in the first place. Aren't toggles suppose to be really hard to put in a game after all? I mean at least thats what I keep reading. So ignoring any personal feelings on the matter I think it would be too much of a pain to implement that it would ever even become an option in the first place anyway.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




