8 réponses à ce sujet

[M4XXST3IN]

I Would like to see more Creatures from Dragon Age Origins like Sylvans.

[Saphiron123]

I'd like to see more types of demons to make the rifts more interesting.

That said, I'd much rather see a city or two. Fricking sick of forests, and the one screen of val Royeaux left me wanting.

[leadintea]

I like the new creatures we got in DA:I, but they didn't have as much presence as the human enemies, which I thought was a shame. I also didn't like how the majority of the creatures shared the same body shape and hope to see more variety in the next game.

[Maconbar]

The only new creature this game needs is the gelatinous cube.

[Kapparoth]

I wouldn't say that the creatures are not diverse enough (easily on par with DA:O, I think), but it's strange that in a game about a demon invasion and a mage-templar war there are no desire demons and abominations. One could expect them, even if it meant doing away with some of the wildlife.

[Fireheart]

I would like to see the changelings from DAA make a return somehow. They were cool and interesting. I loved how they had multiple forms.

[Kantr]

I would like to see the changelings from DAA make a return somehow. They were cool and interesting. I loved how they had multiple forms.

What are their real names?

[Rawgrim]

The only new creature this game needs is the gelatinous cube.

 

A duckbunny. Trust me. every game needs one. And it is a official d&d monster, believe it or not.

[Andraste_Reborn]

So: gelatinous cubes, duckbunnies and owlbears. (I mean, if we're having duckbunnies, then surely the more classic 'what was that mage thinking?!' combo animal has to get in.)

 

All we need now are Flumphs.