The issue is the wording in this case is ambiguous.
Kind of like a poorly worded question almost, if people don't understand the question, it's simply a bad one in the end that shouldn't be used. I get that the interpretation of what is being said is true. I agree that it is separate and the wording said so.
the problem is it says that without saying it, it's inferred that the interpretation will be understood, and we know it wasn't by the vast majority.
what's done is done, the point though is that it was simply poorly worded, regardless of what people believe. If it wasn't, this thread would not exist. Simple as that.
Here's the thing even if the wording in the blog title is ambiguous and I don't conceded that it is, reading the actual blog post confirms exactly what "features" the Black Emporium.
Here is the title of the post
"Introducing the DAI Patch 5 Beta Program, Featuring the Black Emporium" [my emphasis added]
Now read the post after two introductory paragraphs about the patching process we have this
"Enter the Patch 5 beta program."
now any misunderstanding about what exactly is featuring the Black Emporium should no longer be possible since that is the exact same noun phrase used in the title
There is even more, later on we have this gem:
"As part of the beta, participants will have access to the Black Emporium"
"as part of the beta"
So really can't bring myself to take anyone seriously who says they thought Black Emporium was being released with Patch 5
since reading a couple hundred words would have cleared that up for all but the most obtuse or disingenuous