As i said, Im more worried about the lack of Dwarves for the next game. With Turner and Hepler gone, who will continue writing them?
Playing as a dwarf in Origins was some of the most fun I've ever had in an RPG. Both origins were fantastic; playing a stoic Noble who backed Harrowmont to stop my conniving brother from taking the throne and destroying our traditions was great, while going from petty criminal to kingmaker (and killing my boss and former best friend along the way) as a Commoner was an absolute blast. Oghren was a sound deconstruction of the "drunken dwarf barbarian" trope while Sigrun's suicidal streak was a great way of showing the unique spin Dragon Age has on dwarves.
Fast-forward to DA2. Varric is a surfacer, whose character has nothing to do with dwarven culture. The Orzammar choices led to a whopping one possible side quest. You deal with nothing but the Carta. The one bit of neat dwarf lore - the implications of the primeval thaig - are quickly brushed off, in favor of the human-centric plot.
Inquisition lets us play as a dwarf... a surfacer assumed to be an Andrastian, whose background ties into nothing but a couple War Table missions. Varric comes back and continues to have nothing to do with "real" dwarven culture. Scout Harding may as well be human (being from Redcliffe and having no culturally ties to the dwarves) while Dagna is a willing outcast who only talks about magic. More of the Carta, more humans taking red lyrium, blah blah blah.
Why does Orzammar never come up, or Kal-Sharok for that matter? Why do we hear nothing about the lost dwarf empire while we drown in exposition about the ancient elves? Where are the dwarves who aren't from the surface? It's a huge letdown, and I doubt it's something we'll see change. I hope someone else is upset by this.