I disagree (but thanks for polite disagreement). When you take writing--or even read Stephen King's novel on writing, they tell you that once you make the rules for your world be consistent with them. Thedas has had rules about who can marry whom, who can lead the Chantry, who is this class or that class. They made the rules. If they wanted to change they need a Deus ex Machina moment where you see that change coming from above, not switch behind the scenes between games.
Anyway, I like that you disagree nicely. That rarely happens on forums.
Dragon Age is part of a medium that allows you to have room because it makes - for all sake of argument - things that are otherwise impossible in the real world to be attainable or even a common aspect of that established world. The world of Dragon Age for the most part has followed its rules; there is a Chantry, but there are also elves who've warred with them. There's the Qun, with the Qunari in the Northern areas of Thedas. There are dwarves, with their Paragons and underground societies.
The class system, while similar to medieval Europe, has key distinctions in that some of the most influential figures are matriarchal, with the Divines of the Sunburst Throne, the Left and Right Hand, etc. You have Templars who imbibe strange fluids to be able to block magic, and Seekers who derive their powers from ancient rituals. Then there's the Imperium which once ruled all of Thedas - I think that's a blatant analogue of Rome - and also responsible for the very Blight that's stricken the world, thanks to the ambition of Corypheus and the other Magisters that stormed the Black City. You also have a political system used to control those with magical ability in the Circles. So, as far as the universe has been established, I think it is consistent.
But yeah, I'm a passionate debater, but I nonetheless respect others, even those I disagree with strongly. Been here for years and have seen much worse in my time.





Retour en haut





