13 réponses à ce sujet

[Shadow of Ashes]

I'm clicking on all of the tiles thus far, and the ones showing up are more or less the right ones with my first playthrough, but when I get to the part where it asks what principle the Inquisition was founded on, what I have is "declared for the Inquisitor." That sounds pretty power-focused to me, and my character wasn't ambitious (my other guy, he's ridiculously ambitious). All she wanted was to make things right and safe in the world again (and I chose carefully in the dialogue [to the best of my ability] to make it so). 

 

So, what constitutes that result? I don't need a direct answer, but I'm curious about opinions. Is it because she wasn't convinced she was chosen by Andraste? Or maybe that she was on the fence about the mage/templar argument (as a Dalish elf) and didn't take sides? Is the fact that she wanted the Inquisition to be a neutral, unbiased, separate party from the Chantry (especially after the crap they dealt her in the beginning)? Those are questions I'm asking myself. It just doesn't sit right with me, if any of these are the case, that trying to be unbiased means she wanted power for herself.

[Liec]

That tile depends on what you say when you're named Inquisitor, when you hold up the sword at Skyhold. Maybe you said that "I/an elf/mage shall lead us" and that counts as putting yourself at the center of the Inquisition.

[mat_mark]

This is strange... in the game we have like eight choices during The Inquisitor first speech, while in The Keep only three...

[Shadow of Ashes]

That tile depends on what you say when you're named Inquisitor, when you hold up the sword at Skyhold. Maybe you said that "I/an elf/mage shall lead us" and that counts as putting yourself at the center of the Inquisition.

 

Huh... I don't even remember what I said there, but I guess it makes sense. Is that certain?

 

 

This is strange... in the game we have like eight choices during The Inquisitor first speech, while in The Keep only three...

 

It's probably because you can sum up those eight choices with three results.

[Kantr]

I said I would be an example to mages, and got the "For the inquisitor"

[Shadow of Ashes]

Well, the tile did say "whether for ambition or to be an exemplar". Being an example probably falls under that category.

[Kulyok]

That really doesn't make sense."I want to restore order" is one thing. "I want to kill Cory and get the hell out of here" is another thing. "I just want to do what's right generally" is another thing entirely. Why wouldn't they add those choices? Seriously, it's back to "power jerk", "faith", "not a jerk". Ugh.

[mat_mark]

-"A dwarf/elf/qunari will stand for us all" - Inquisitor

 

-"I'll set an example as a mage." (mage only) - Inquisitor

 

-"I fight for order, not faith." (non-believer only) - Order

 

-"I'll be a servant of faith" (believer only) - Faith

 

-"I'll do because it's right" (non-believer only) - Inquisitor

 

-"I'll lead them to vengeance" - Inquisitor

 

-"I'll do it for my own power" - Inquisitor

[Shadow of Ashes]

"I'll do it because it's right" doesn't seem like an exemplar thing to me.

[Alex Hawke]

 

-"A dwarf/elf/qunari will stand for us all" - Inquisitor

 

-"I'll set an example as a mage." (mage only) - Inquisitor

 

-"I fight for order, not faith." (non-believer only) - Order

 

-"I'll be a servant of faith" (believer only) - Faith

 

-"I'll do because it's right" (non-believer only) - Inquisitor

 

-"I'll lead them to vengeance" - Inquisitor

 

-"I'll do it for my own power" - Inquisitor

 

"I'll do it to stop Corypheus" counts as for Inquisitor or for order?

[Heidirs]

"I'll do it to stop Corypheus" counts as for Inquisitor or for order?

 

I would think for "order." But it is confusing. I hope they clarify those choices a little more.

[mat_mark]

I would think for "order." But it is confusing. I hope they clarify those choices a little more.

 

"I'll do it to stop Corypheus" counts as for Inquisitor or for order?

"Inquisitor" 

[Shadow of Ashes]

 

"I'll do it to stop Corypheus" counts as for Inquisitor or for order?

 

"Inquisitor" 

 

But that doesn't make sense. The tile for Order says "Be it revenge against Corypheus or a desire to simply settle a world gone mad...etc". It stands to reason that the response would count for order, right?

[Heidirs]

 

But that doesn't make sense. The tile for Order says "Be it revenge against Corypheus or a desire to simply settle a world gone mad...etc". It stands to reason that the response would count for order, right?

 

 

You're right. It doesn't make sense. But I think it goes to "Inquisitor" because the lines in that speech is "Corypheus will never stop hunting me," so the emphasis is on the Inquisitor themselves. But I'm not crazy about it. It seems like twisting the words a bit. Like having the mage/dwarf/elf/qunari speech be for the "Inquisitor" when that speech is so much about Thedas... feels like it's making something self-serving that as a player wasn't intended that way. Then again, maybe we're taking the "inquisitor" purpose as self-serving when it's not meant to be?

 

I don't know. Not a fan of how that was set up.