For me I identify with Zelda as being Yoshiaki Koizumi's brainchild as much as Miyamoto. Miyamoto was always kind of more Mario to me, but obviously Zelda too. It's just that the master sword, dark worlds, etc, all these things were more directly from Koizumi is my understanding.
For those who don't know he got involved with A Link to the Past, Link's Awakening, Majora's Mask, and a portion of Wind Waker. Zelda 1, Zelda 2, Twilight Princess and Skyward Sword, as well as all the handheld Zeldas I don't think he really had a role in at all.
Skyward Sword having a stamina bar, etc, it has kind of a more Mario aesthetic in some ways, it all means I don't know what to think of Zelda now. I hope the next one is good but I'm not really sure what to think since I don't even know how involved Miyamoto is either, so it's a weird time for Zelda is what I'm saying I guess.
You could argue Demon Soul's is actually a truer successor to the spirit of a Link to the Past but I don't really enjoy dying 10 zillion times so eh.. it's a hard series to replace really..
How similar is Legend of Zelda to the Souls series when it comes to their approach to lore? Do they leave much of it mysterious while leaving most of it to be figured out by the players themselves?





Retour en haut








