"There comes a time in every project when you must shoot the engineer and begin production."
I am ecstatic that there was an engineer shot in Edmonton before Christmas 2014.
I am thoroughly enjoying DAI despite its flaws (which seem to be deminishing with every patch), and am thankful that DAI did not get delayed until 2015 or 2016.
"There comes a time in every project when you must shoot the engineer and begin production."
I am ecstatic that there was an engineer shot in Edmonton before Christmas 2014.
I am thoroughly enjoying DAI despite its flaws (which seem to be deminishing with every patch), and am thankful that DAI did not get delayed until 2015 or 2016.
What's with you North Americans and shooting people?
I know right?What's with you North Americans and shooting people?
What's with you North Americans and shooting people?
"Take our American democracy. Right between the eyes!"
They shot all the Q&A testers, that's would explain all the bugs on release and why they need the community to be their new testers.
They shot all the Q&A testers, that's would explain all the bugs on release and why they need the community to be their new testers.
Wait,,, Does that mean they shot all the community beta testers too? Because bugs were released with the patch even after the community beta testing.
They shot all the Q&A testers, that's would explain all the bugs on release and why they need the community to be their new testers.
There is a misunderstanding.
Q&A simply report their findings and have no power to enforce bug fixing.
I think the real question is, who shot the quest designer?
After finishing the Wicked hearts and wicked eyes quest I have it on good authority that the rumours of quest designer's death were greatly exaggerated. I mean it's not New Vegas but it's still pretty damn amazing.
"There comes a time in every project when you must shoot the engineer and begin production."
I am ecstatic that there was an engineer shot in Edmonton before Christmas 2014.
I am thoroughly enjoying DAI despite its flaws (which seem to be deminishing with every patch), and am thankful that DAI did not get delayed until 2015 or 2016.
This game needed the extra development time. Too many aspects of it feel unfinished, and an ungodly amount of interesting planned features were cut.
DAI had an extra year of development time, and its release was delayed twice.
Given that DAI has won hundreds of game of the year awards, EA/Bioware made the right decision in releasing the game before Xmas, and avoiding releasing DAI simultaneously with Witcher 3.
How much longer do you think the game should have been delayed??? 2016??? Forever??? Until it became "perfect"???
DAI had an extra year of development time, and its release was delayed twice.
Given that DAI has won hundreds of game of the year awards, EA/Bioware made the right decision in releasing the game before Xmas, and avoiding releasing DAI simultaneously with Witcher 3.
How much longer do you think the game should have been delayed??? 2016??? Forever??? Until it became "perfect"???
Three years of development is not enough???
If the game took any longer to release, Bioware would have been accused of lollygagging.
Many were already upset that the game was delayed a year.
Three years was enough time to wait to shoot the engineer and get on with production (game release).
There is a misunderstanding.
Q&A simply report their findings and have no power to enforce bug fixing.
You're right. There is a misunderstanding. They weren't all shot. Some were poisoned! 
Retour en haut
