I'd agree if this change happened 10 years ago. The system is already uprooted thanks to wars, the Divine's death, Coryphaces's antics, etc. Bringing any stability is welcome and in a world where the mages helped close the Breach and are supported by the Inquisition, attitudes towards giving mages freedom will be different than if none of that happened. Trying to uproot the system when things were relatively stable (like I said, 10 years ago) wouldn't work obviously.
I disagree with the bit regarding attitudes towards magic following the events of DA:I.
Remember, it was a mage who destroyed the Chantry in Kirkwall and ignited the war between the Mages and the Templars. It was a blighted magister and his Grey Warden mage minions whom were responsible for the explosion at the Conclave. It was the Venatori, an extremist faction from a nation ruled by mages, that caused much upheaval throughout the courts of nobles in Southern Thedas. It was the leader of the mage rebellion who submitted to a Tevinter Magister and booted Arl Teagan from Redcliffe.
If you also factor in the centuries-old attitudes towards magic in the South, I doubt that the mundanes would be any more favourable towards magic and its practitioners than they were prior to this whole ordeal.
In fact, Vivienne will always receive three uprisings under her rule which are undoubtedly linked to her being a mage. That does not spell an overall greater acceptance towards mages throughout the land.
By the way, nice avatar.





Guest_Imanol de Tafalla_*
Retour en haut





