I Prefer a sequel.
For me; It will be awkward if it's the same timeline as Shepard. I'll want to play Shepard.
My general view: Prequels are bad... I wouldn't go there.
Reality: We just don't know yet. So.. speculate away. Nothing wrong with speculating.
So here's some speculation:
MENext takes place years after the Reapers and Shepard is just a blip in the history books. <sigh>
MENext takes place during Shepards timeframe and focuses on Captain Riley or some other person barely mentioned/present in the trilogy. <yawn>
MeNext takes place during the Turian/Human wars and puts players to sleep... <yawn yawn yawn>
Well I think this is what Bioware is doing. Taken from one of my conversation in Scuttlebut
Mcfly616: actually, after "new region of space", the article clearly states "prompting some to suggest it would be set in a whole new galaxy". Meaning people such as yourself, speculating on the possibilities. Also, giving nods to fans of the past trilogy and past adventures, doesn't necessarily confirm a sequel either. It just means that we'll find something familiar to us in the next game, not that the next game takes place after said adventures. It's clear they are speaking of the players past experiences. Not necessarily the past of the fictional setting. For example, a side-quel can easily give nods to our past experiences in the Shepard trilogy.
Yes, I would also like to further explore the MEU with more freedom than ever before. However, the timeline doesn't affect my interest in journeying through the cosmos.
My response:
you mean the galaxy map and things we have been familiar with over the past? the normandy perhaps? codex and shiet UI interface? you mean the elements of the previous games? this is like my Final Fantasy Explanation earlier...
so basically we are left in a LIMBO of not knowing whether this is a RESTART / REBOOT or A SEQUEL? WTF IS THIS? well I will attempt to explain the possibilities of approach which maybe taken by Bioware
Basically if they do decide a sequel they have to canonize one of the endings of ME3.
Since Humans and previous races are still existing we know that the REFUSE ending is not canon.
If and only if individuals in ME4 have green eyes then synthesis is canon but if no green eyes, then synthesis is out the window.
The only 2 left to speculate on how ME4 is connected is DESTROY AND CONTROL
If in ME4 there are few to 0 reaper remains then we will obviously know control is canon
if there are hundreds of thousand of Reaper remains scattered in the milky way galaxy then destroy is canon.
~When a fan asked one of the devs via twitter about "import saves" the devs replied it is not needed because ME4 is the best way to jump into the series. This can imply to two things: the game is a RESTART / REBOOT no explanation needed for new comers [which explains my restart/reboot approach], or the next game is a sequel which explains the past events in a nutshell. (however, someone told me that it would most certainly be like dragon age origins)
~The fan then asked if that ME3's destroy ending is canon but the devs refused everything saying that there is no canon ending.
- The question now is HOW WILL ME4 BEGIN, It's execution, it's lore, "nods to past adventures" what is it? a codex entry about the past? a comic series about shep and co after the reaper war? will the citadel be back? will it be like Skyrim referencing the Oblivion crisis with books scattered throughout the gameworld? or is it too familiar that everything is there including all the elements of the previous games but it is independent from ME3 which would be similar to Final Fantasy new titles... a Restart / Reboot of the entire franchise or a re-telling of the same story involving the same heroes, the same elements and core mechanics but no connection to previous titles... the tradition of Square-Enix that I know too well which is not the tradition of Bioware nor Mass Effect. Since the devs keeps on insisting that there is no canon ending then we can certainly not move forward without a canon beginning influenced by the canon ending if we are taking the route of a sequel... the only way to move forward without a canon beginning influenced by the canon ending is to restart the franchise.
well we know for certain that ME3 does not have a canon ending according to Bioware so how do they execute ME4 without a canon beginning influenced by 3? some suggest that it takes place 800 years later that the effects of 3 can just be "hand waived" but still go back to my first explanations about the canon beginning... no canon ending yes but the possibility of a canon beginning is likely if it is influenced by 3 AT ALL... to neglect the ending of 3 and to move forward for the sake of moving forward would mean a huge plot hole if it is a sequel or it could indicate a total restart of the franchise hence my theory the ALTERNATE + REBOOT / RESTART will come into mind.
others then speculated that everything in ME3 was just a dream so yeah lol
the NEXT GAME will tell us if it is a sequel or a restart.. either way I wish Bioware luck
Mcfly616: a sequel or reboot aren't the only possibilities.
My response:
you mean a prequel and an alternate universe? Bioware does not want the next mass effect to be a spin off or sidelined... they want it to be "Mass Effect" to the core with its own unique and similar lore and core elements. My question now is the method of approach they will take. Because the method used will indicate if it is a prequel, a spin off or alternate universe, a sequel or my theory... a Reboot / Restart which is not necessarily a bad thing.
I AGREE AND I ADMIT moving on will be difficult since we have been accustomed to the past installments especially with our favorite characters but this is not new to me. Square Enix hell even Rockstar games forces me to move forward. I sincerely believe the next game is a RESTART or REBOOT of the franchise even without CONFIRMATION from Bioware I may be right or horribly wrong but this is the most logical approach in my own understanding for Bioware to take for the future of Mass Effect. Will there be angry fans because of the cliff hanger of ME3? Yes there will always be opposition no matter what but I agree with you that it has to END ONCE AND FOR ALL. We can't keep going around in circles...
Rockstar with VICE CITY same core elements -> Steal a car -> rob people -> kill people -> criminal life -> gangsta life.
GTA V -> Steal a car -> rob people -> kill people -> criminal life -> gangsta life BUT NO CONNECTION TO VICE CITY.
similar to final fantasy... it has worked very well people love them! so why shouldn't I love the next ME4? it would have
similar weapons -> returning species -> exploration and feel of MASS EFFECT 1 -> Core elements -> music -> same elements BUT NO CONNECTION TO 1 2 AND 3.
Bioware from multiple reports and interviews stated again that the next game must stand on its own they do not want it perceived by the public as a spinoff... it is a game of its own which may spawn a trilogy of its own.