1. The Ten Commandments? Really, you think that is an example of clear guidelines? Fourth commandment in it is Honour thy Mother and Father. What does that mean? That you do everything they say, honor in spirit? Can you defy their word while still honouring them? Too abstract. Well, there is also the Fift Commandment Thou shalt not kill/murder, depending on the translation. That's clear, right? I mean it doesn't create any kind of complicated questions about self-defense, defense of others, the duty soldiers,,so forth. Besides, the period when the original commandments and the Testaments was culturally so vastly different from moden days that it is fools folly to expect their interpretations to be exactly the same in both times. It's funny, you could kind of think that the Qun culture is similarly vastly different from our culture.
And again, Sten's vision of the battlefield is utterly meaningless in this conversation based on the lore as it is not Sten's role to say what is and isn't within the Qun or to teach it to others. Tallis is not a warrior according to the Qun, yet she does engage in physical combat. So apparently to the Qun, being a warrior is something other than just swinging a weapon. Based on the same logic, it is quite feasible that according to the Qun being a woman means something differently than being born biologically a woman. And by the way, if you paid attention, I never claimed Iron Bull was a more trusted source than Sten, they both simply observe different facets of the Qun. If anything, Iron Bull just talks more about the Qun than Sten did. It was your insistance that Sten is the most truest source of all things the Qun because he was there first and said some things while refusing to provide any kind of context for the culture.
2.Of course words change meanings based on culture, that's a really weird statement to make. For example, the word husband is in several cultures, yet what it is expected from a husband is different not just across cultures, but also within a culture itself. I'm not writing that Sten didn't follow the Qun, I'm writing that there was little context given to any of those statements. For example, Sten says that he would be killed without the Qunari even listening to his report if returned without that one specific sword. Is that what the dominant culture of Ferelden expected of their soldiers? Sten's name is his position. Is that how the dominant culture views names? Yet all of this can be contributed to the Qunari being such a mystifying culture, but damn it, the terms woman and warrior mean exactly the same things to them. And yeah, Tallis can do stuff most cultures would view as warrior things because she is a spy-thing. Completely understandable.
And that Tal-Vashoth comment gave no context to the position. Again, it was something truly defined in DA2 as was almost all current aspects of the Qunari.
Is everyone forgetting their trip to the Qun compound in DA:2 or ...I dunno, pretty much anything the actual Arishok said or did? Does all that experience fly out the window when we want to defend the game developers for retconning?
Look, it's their game. They can change it if they want. George Lucas got to change his Star Wars mythos because he ****** wrote the thing. Let's just not pretend though that they didn't have one intention 5 years ago and a different one now.
The Qunari were the bad guys of DA2 because they forced roles on people and it was considered by Hawke a type of slavery.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





