Aller au contenu

Photo

Qunari Retcon


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
316 réponses à ce sujet

#201
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 253 messages

There is no one else in the game to claim otherwise. The Iron Bull is the only character who knows both Krem and the Qun. He is the only source, and he has been proven to be an unreliable source. Your claim hinges completely on him, and I contend that he is incorrect.

 

Bull, by definition, cannot be incorrect, as he is the most current official source of information on the matter. Unless Bioware retcons what Bull says later on down the road or reveals that he was mistaken about something, his word is correct, because it's what we have to go on.


  • Winged Silver aime ceci

#202
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 675 messages

They don't and they don't. They just care about whether or not someone is legitimately good at fighting and is willing to fight as a male. As long as those things hold, that person can be either a regular warrior or an Aqun-aathlok.

 

You're a female who identifies as male but can't fight? Too bad. Re-education time. Or you're a male who can fight but identify as female? Re-education. The idea that the Qun cares about gender identity is false. They care about extracting the maximum utility out of their people based on their abilities. That's it.

 

For people who still think this is a retcon, look at post 14 of this thread, which was created well before Dragon Age 2 was out. There, a Bioware writer states that even if you've been specifically bred as a warrior, if you end up being more intellectual, you will get reassigned as a priest or weapons researcher, or Ben-Hassrath. Job roles in the Qunari are not and have never been assigned at birth.

 

Which of course would defeat the entire point of "only men can be warriors". So the Qunari makes a stupid rule that women cannot be warriors, refuse to change this stupid rule because it clearly isn't true, and yet they allow the rule to be bent by merely declaring all female warriors as males?

 

That makes the Qunari real stupid, and it makes their story stupid.

 

But I contend that your opinions on the Qun are unfounded. Your one and only source is The Iron Bull, and his is proven to be an unreliable source of information on the Qun.


  • Dutch aime ceci

#203
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 675 messages

I am also mystified in this thread by somehow placing Sten as the base truth of what the Qunari should be for two reasons: 1) It would basically the first Swede you ever meet is the ultimate truthful depicion of Swedish culture and every Swede you meet after that making contradictory claims is lying, and more importantly 2) Sten doesn't actually say that much about Qunari culture. He actually refuses to speak about the Qun in majority of instances, making those few statements he makes very difficult to interpret since there is almost context to base it on. I think that is part of the reason why some people were able to build so far-reaching headcanons of what he said as there was such a huge amount of available interpretations.

 

Related to my second point, what baffles me in the examples used is that almost all of the things now considered crucial for the Qunari culture were not established by Sten or even in DAO, they were established in DA2. The Triumvirate, the Tal-Vastoth, division of tasks, etc, and one of the characters in the game was one of the leaders of the whole Qunari. Tallis tells us much more about the Qun than Sten and what they did with Krem is not contradictory with anything presented in that game and culture. Yet not only is that ignored, for some unfathomable reason Sten's insanely vague statements are seen to discredit the massive work DA2 did on this matter and, according to this thread, their horns somehow made them more human. This argument makes my head more and more.

 

1) Not the same. The Sten exists in a story world, not a real world. The Sten describes a teaching of the Qun. This is a reference to fact, written in black and white, inside of a religious book. That is nothing like a Swede being a depiction of the entire Swedish culture. The Sten refers to one simple belief, documented and verifiable. The Sten is also highly educated and devout in his beliefs. The Iron Bull was one exploded dreadnaught away from being declared Tal-Vashoth by the other half of those in authority over him. Also, his title means "liar". So no, we're not questioning any other Qunari to come along and say something different. We are questioning a character that is stated to be an unreliable source of information.

 

2) Not the point. This isn't about Qunari culture. It is about Qunari belief regarding this one issue of gender and the roles attributed to it.

 

The Tal-Vashoth were mentioned in Origins and explained in Awakening.

 

It isn't what they did with Krem, it's what they did with The Iron Bull.



#204
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 675 messages

Bull, by definition, cannot be incorrect, as he is the most current official source of information on the matter. Unless Bioware retcons what Bull says later on down the road or reveals that he was mistaken about something, his word is correct, because it's what we have to go on.

 

He is the most current official source of incorrect information on the matter. His title is "liar". He was suspected of being Tal-Vashoth. He had reason to lie. His statements were unclear.
 



#205
Sylvius the Mad

Sylvius the Mad
  • Members
  • 24 108 messages

The Qun demands truth. Physical reality shows Krem is female, and that is what the Qunari would go by to determine Krem's role.

You're misusing the word again. Physical reality has nothing to do with Krem's gender.

Stop applying your own biases. Use the Qun's biases instead. And the way you find out what those are is to take everything you know about the Qun and make it all make sense at once. It's like a thought experiment. What you know of the world isn't relevant because the experiment has its own reality. The Qun is the same; its perception of reality differs from yours. You won't understand ot as long as you keep clinging to your own definitions.

Prove that biological sex is not a relevant criterion to the Qunari in determining the roles of others brought under the Qun.

That's not how proof works.

Your scenario has no relevance to this discussion. The Qunari do have roles that can be filled by either gender. Only certain roles are gender specific. The Qunari do not assign biological sex. Nature does this. The Qunari merely recognize it.

You have no evidence that they do. You do have evidence that they don't.

In the absence of evidence, you're the one making extraordinary claims. I'm merely taking the evidence at face value.

A female might show skill with a blade as well as a spatula. Her being female means she will not be assigned to the sword. Baker it is for her. Unless she shows skill in agility, in which case she may become a Ben-Hassrath spy like Tallis. If people were assigned roles based only on skill but not on biological sex, then you could not logically call these gender roles. Again, biological sex is not assigned by the Qunari, and they certainly don't flip a coin to determine it.

Why are you still equating sex and gender? Do you have any evidence that the Qunari do?
  • Karai9 et phantomrachie aiment ceci

#206
Draining Dragon

Draining Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 492 messages

Why are you still equating sex and gender? Do you have any evidence that the Qunari do?


Sten tells a female warden she looks like a woman.
  • Dai Grepher aime ceci

#207
Winged Silver

Winged Silver
  • Members
  • 703 messages

Sten tells a female warden she looks like a woman.

 

Female Wardens aren't really given the option to look/act androgynous in game. It can be assumed that the female warden might also embody certain feminine traits. This might be Sten making the assumption that longer hair = woman, or makeup = woman. Whether or not Sten is being accurate...well, currently open to interpretation, since our knowledge of the Qun is limited at this moment in time. 



#208
Sylvius the Mad

Sylvius the Mad
  • Members
  • 24 108 messages

Sten tells a female warden she looks like a woman.

As has been previously established in this thread, DAO assumes the Warden is cisgendered.  Hence the gender-specific clothing in every armour-class but one.

 

A female Warden behaves as a female and presents herself as a female.  Sten correctly identifies her as female.



#209
DomeWing333

DomeWing333
  • Members
  • 546 messages

Which of course would defeat the entire point of "only men can be warriors". So the Qunari makes a stupid rule that women cannot be warriors, refuse to change this stupid rule because it clearly isn't true, and yet they allow the rule to be bent by merely declaring all female warriors as males?

 

That makes the Qunari real stupid, and it makes their story stupid.

Yes. How unthinkable. A communist society that chains and mutilates people for being mages, brainwashes its followers into blind obedience, and believes in the eventual subjugation of the entire world under its belief system can't possibly have any stupid beliefs.


  • Karai9, Bayonet Hipshot et Winged Silver aiment ceci

#210
Hiemoth

Hiemoth
  • Members
  • 739 messages

1) Not the same. The Sten exists in a story world, not a real world. The Sten describes a teaching of the Qun. This is a reference to fact, written in black and white, inside of a religious book. That is nothing like a Swede being a depiction of the entire Swedish culture. The Sten refers to one simple belief, documented and verifiable. The Sten is also highly educated and devout in his beliefs. The Iron Bull was one exploded dreadnaught away from being declared Tal-Vashoth by the other half of those in authority over him. Also, his title means "liar". So no, we're not questioning any other Qunari to come along and say something different. We are questioning a character that is stated to be an unreliable source of information.

 

2) Not the point. This isn't about Qunari culture. It is about Qunari belief regarding this one issue of gender and the roles attributed to it.

 

The Tal-Vashoth were mentioned in Origins and explained in Awakening.

 

It isn't what they did with Krem, it's what they did with The Iron Bull.

 

1) Based on this logic any Christian priest is able to explain to be me the whole Christianty in a clear way no other Christian would contradict? Besides the Qun is insanely complex in its simplicity, as is pointed out several times in the games, and you have no idea what the actual black and white section in their religious book says because Sten never quoted anything relevant to this matter.

 

To even go further in the sanctity of Sten, how exactly do we know he is somehow really educated and solemn on the matter? Again, there is no context in DAO to establish this. Furthermore, Sten is a soldier, he is of the Body, not of the Soul that actually weighs in on these things. So Sten's comments on the matter are pretty much meaningless if we are really that devoted to the lore.

 

2) Again, this argument is insanely oversimplifying the thing as you cannot separate their whole culture and that one statement because the culture defines what that statement means. The statement is that a woman cannot be a warrior. The statement does not define what is a woman or a warrior to the Qun as shown by Tallis and her role. The only way you can make such a claim is that if fill out the context left unsaid by Sten by existing cultural standards, except we already know from the lore that the Qunari do not follow existing cultural standards.

 

And where in Awakenings were the Tal-Vashoth explained, since their first actual codex entry is from DA2, where they are actually shown within the context of the Qun culture.


  • phantomrachie et Panda aiment ceci

#211
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

The statement does not define what is a woman or a warrior to the Qun as shown by Tallis and her role. The only way you can make such a claim is that if fill out the context left unsaid by Sten by existing cultural standards, except we already know from the lore that the Qunari do not follow existing cultural standards.

 

Tallis is her role. She's not a warrior. "To solve". An investigator of sorts, I suppose.


  • soren4ever, 9TailsFox, Dutch et 1 autre aiment ceci

#212
Draining Dragon

Draining Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 492 messages

As has been previously established in this thread, DAO assumes the Warden is cisgendered.  Hence the gender-specific clothing in every armour-class but one.
 
A female Warden behaves as a female and presents herself as a female.  Sten correctly identifies her as female.


Sten says she LOOKS like a woman. As in, physically, she appears to be a woman. Sten thinks that she isn't behaving like a woman, which is what confuses him.
  • Dutch et Dai Grepher aiment ceci

#213
Hiemoth

Hiemoth
  • Members
  • 739 messages

Tallis is her role. She's not a warrior. "To solve". An investigator of sorts, I suppose.

 

Exactly. That was my point. To the Qun, she is not a warrior, thus she can be a woman. To an outsider seeing her hacking people to pieces, she is a warrior. The qunari definition of terms is often not the same than what is generally considered. It is one of things that makes them so unique and interesting.



#214
phantomrachie

phantomrachie
  • Members
  • 1 176 messages

Sten says she LOOKS like a woman. As in, physically, she appears to be a woman. Sten thinks that she isn't behaving like a woman, which is what confuses him.

 

Well considering at no point in DA:O did Sten get to inspect the Warden's gentaila, by your own logic the fact that Krem looks & behaves like a man would be enough for the Qun.


  • daveliam, Karai9, Winged Silver et 2 autres aiment ceci

#215
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

Exactly. That was my point. To the Qun, she is not a warrior, thus she can be a woman. To an outsider seeing her hacking people to pieces, she is a warrior. The qunari definition of terms is often not the same than what is generally considered. It is one of things that makes them so unique and interesting.

 

I get the feeling she's like.. a mix of a hunter and detective. I don't know.. the whole Ben Hassarath thing and "solver" role sounds like that. It was kind of what she was doing in Redemption.

 

I don't think they're that interesting though. There is too much spin on linguistics and definitions that it just frustrates me. I read up on them because I feel obligated, being a DA fan.



#216
PsychoBlonde

PsychoBlonde
  • Members
  • 5 129 messages

As for same-sex marriage itself, I'm not sure what you mean by it not being a "profitable" thing to include in the games. If you think that marriage shouldn't be in DA at all, fine, but that's not the impression I got. Bioware will continue having same-sex romance options in their games, so if they added marriage as an addition to romances, why not same-sex ones too? It's not a question of it being "profitable", especially considering any point they made about the LGBT community has already been made. Adding marriage doesn't change that.

 

I meant that spending a lot of resources on exploring "Marriage Across Thedas" like some kind of anthropology report might not be the wisest expenditure.  I don't really care either way if you can actually propose/get married in the game.  If it's in the game and it's cute, yay!  And I would, of course, hope that everybody could get something if possible.  But I just don't think it's worthwhile to make it a Big Deal in the game.



#217
Dai Grepher

Dai Grepher
  • Members
  • 4 675 messages

Okay. Sure. My opinion. And potentially that of the Qun. Why would someone's decision to identify as man or woman affect society? I don't believe there's ever been a moment in game where someone of the Qun specifically states "You saying you're a man and acting like a man even though you were born a woman is tearing the fabric of society apart". And when you say "These are you beliefs, not the Qunari's" where are you getting that? Is the tome of the Ashkaari Koslun a rare codex we can pick up and read? Because if not, than all we can do is speculate to the best of our abilities given the limited nature of the evidence presented. That is primarily why I use the phrase "I believe", seeing as I have no way to confirm everything. And neither do you. 

 

Krem is not Qunari, so your comparison of the baker isn't really applicable. However, on that note, the Qunari who is placed into the role of a baker (which is a woman's job in the Qun, implied by Solas discussing seeing a female Qunari baker put a pinch of sugar in the center of each loaf, as her own small rebellion (if you talk to him about his journeys into the Fade)) is placed there based on an evaluation of physical and mental traits. While this baker may wish to be a warrior, it has been determined that by said traits, this individual would not be suitable as a warrior. Thus, his being a warrior would be a detriment in that he would not be realizing his full potential in his contributions to his society. And this is just hypothetically going with the idea that a baker would be a male in Qunari society, to fit your argument. What must be remembered is that the Qun takes a different view on what harms a society. In our own society, we very much believe in letting a person self determine their fate. This does not appear to be the case in the Qunari society.

 

You are describing possibilities, and not facts. While these may be the case, I do not interpret his actions to equate your assertions. If the Iron Bull is describing what he thinks the Qun should be like, than that may play into something we do see in our own world very often - various degrees of religious fervor. It is not unthinkable that there would be different levels of devotion amongst the Qunari. And one simply being more devoted than another does not immediately equate 'bad religion'. I think if you made that argument, there would be many people of different faiths who would find fault with that line of thinking. And, as I said before, since Krem doesn't care much about the Qun, there would be little reason for the Iron Bull to lie/half truth about the Aqun-Athlok. Now if Krem had expressed an interest in game about joining the Qun, this might have more meaning. But he doesn't. So there's not really any reason for the Bull to pretend that his religion would accept Krem, if they didn't. 

 

You keep calling the Iron Bull unreliable, but this is solely based on your interpretation of events. If he were truly uncertain of the Qun, he would not have submitted himself for re-education. His willingness to do so, even knowing what happened to those who underwent it, is indicative that he truly believed in the Qun. Additionally, we've only had close contact with two individuals of the Qunari faith, each of whom were quite different. But that difference does not immediately indicate that one is 'more correct' than the other. Until we've actually visited  Par Vollen, this is something we will only be able to speculate about.

 

"A female cannot be a male" but Krem isn't a female under the Qun. Krem says he is a man. Krem does manly things. Therefore, he fulfills the role as set by the Qun. The Qun takes issues with women doing manly things. Krem isn't being a warrior woman. He is being a male warrior, which falls into the right category. If you watch the video I linked earlier, Sten says the female warden must either be lying about being a woman, or a warrior. In Krem's case, he isn't being a woman, he is being a male who fights. 

 

Potentially that of the Qun, yes.

 

You are asking my personal opinion? Well, assuming the fabric of society is the reason the Qun dictates gender roles, and not just some arbitrary dictate of Koslun, then perhaps the rationale is that certain roles are filled better by certain sexes. Therefore they are defined by gender/sex. However, if a male were to claim to be female or even act female in order to fill a different role, or if a female were to pose as a male to fulfill those roles, it could conceivably create problems. First, the role would not be fulfilled adequately and the role would fail because of the faulty placement of the person posing as the opposite sex. Second, if such behavior were tolerated of some individuals, then others in society may attempt this as well in order to escape the responsibilities of their own roles rather than do as required and embrace their roles faithfully. This would of course lead to the complete collapse of the civilization and the "body" that is the Qun. Could you imagine Qunari soldiers claiming to be female in order to avoid battles for whatever reason? Intolerable.

 

We agree that those are your beliefs. There is no detailed source in the game explaining this issue. All we have to go on are the words of The Sten and The Iron Bull. My only point was that you were projecting your beliefs onto the Qun. While it is possible you are correct about the Qun, there is no evidence that you are correct. I on the other hand, do have evidence. The Sten's words are clear. His credibility, solid. The Iron Bull's words are sly. His credibility, in doubt. The most likely case is that The Sten is correct about the belief structure in which he has full confidence. It is unlikely The Iron Bull is correct about the belief structure he has strayed from in the past, questioned, wants to change, and does not want to see spread to Orlais or Ferelden.

 

I wasn't comparing Krem to the baker. I was citing an example of how the Qunari do not tolerate a baker claiming to be a warrior even if he is male. It is therefore less likely they would tolerate Krem claiming to be a male warrior. The point is about the Qunari belief system. Also, baker could be a gender-neutral role. I don't believe anything states it is female-only. The Qunari do not let them self-determine their fate. So it stands to reason they would not let someone like Krem determine that they are male warriors either.

 

They can find fault with my line of thinking all they want. In such a debate I would quote scripture to prove their religious fervor to be weak and their beliefs to be incorrect. It is the same case with the Qun. Take Gatt for example. He and The Iron Bull know each other and have a history. Gatt outright confesses that he struggles with some parts of the Qun, and that he remains loyal to the Qun because he believes that if he leaves then the parts he doesn't like will never change. This proves that Gatt believes the Qun can and should be changed. Does his friend The Iron Bull believe the same? I don't think that is ever confirmed outright, but there may have been a part of the game where The Iron Bull suggested it. So again, can Hissrad be trusted to portray the Qun accurately? Krem may or may not have asked about the Qun's position on transgenders, but The Iron Bull mentions it regardless. The reasons I stated are still possibilities, and Krem even voices that the Qunari might not be all bad based on what The Iron Bull said about the matter. Also keep in mind that The Iron Bull mentions this in response to the Inquisitor asking about it. So that could have been his reason for talking about it, to smooth things over before any feelings got hurt. The Iron Bull is quite protective of Krem. Questioning him about this later proves this. The Iron Bull insists that Krem is a man...

 

And this reminds me of something else The Iron Bull says. In my mage playthrough he says that he has horns, my mage can shoot fireballs out of his butt, and that because of this they aren't in a position to go around deciding what is normal. But isn't this exactly what the Qun does? Decide what is truth?

 

His reason for submitting to reeducation could have been that he was desperate to find purpose and place in the world, or to alleviate his guilt. Also, he underwent reeducation years before the events of Inquisition. He could have changed since then, and it is his statements in the game that we are questioning here. Perhaps at the time of reeducation The Iron Bull would not have seen Krem as a man. Also, if he truly believed in the Qun during the events of Inquisition, then there would be no choice to save The Chargers or let them die. The Iron Bull would always choose to let them die. I agree that the difference between The Sten and The Iron Bull does not indicate one is correct while the other is not. My claim was that what each one said contradict, and thus one must be correct and the other incorrect. Based on their character traits, I believe The Sten is the more likely Qunari to accurately represent the Qun.

 

"But Krem isn't a female under the Qun." Your opinion, not the Qun's. As I pointed out, merely claiming to be something and filling the roles is not enough. Roles are determined by those in charge, not the individuals who fill them. If The Sten says the Warden must be lying about being a woman, he is referring to her biological sex. He is basically saying the Warden is either a biological male, or not a warrior. This is because biological females cannot be warriors under the Qun.

 

Also, as I wrote in another post, if a female can become a warrior simply by claiming to be a male and living as such, then the rule banning females from being warriors is completely worthless and unnecessary. There is no reason to have it, and thus no reason for females to pretend to be males. Now, personally, I know that the Qun is a lie, but the Qunari don't believe that it is. Either they uphold their rules in full, or they dance around their rules in order to achieve what the rules are designed to prevent. They violate the spirit of the rule.

 

It's like having a rule that says only mules can carry packages for delivery, but we will allow the Qunari who want to deliver packages themselves to do so by merely recognizing them as mules first. Also, this requires them to sleep in the stables in order to consistently fill the role of a mule.


  • 9TailsFox aime ceci

#218
Bayonet Hipshot

Bayonet Hipshot
  • Members
  • 6 768 messages

I am actually quite surprised at how many are taking the word of someone by the name of Hissrad, which translates into being a liar over someone by the name of Sten, which translates into a vanguard.

 

Don't get me wrong, both are not Tamassrans but I find the word of a former vanguard turned Arishok, leader of the army to be more valid than a liar. A liar who's job is to infiltrate other societies under the orders of the religious sect and send reports OR a liar who was then castigated as an outsider. 

 

Iron Bull is a cool guy in the same way James Bond is cool, but I would never expect anything resembling an objective view or an honest view on the English monarchy or the English society from James Bond in the same way I would never expect anything resembling an objective view or an honest view on the Qun from Hissrad. 

 

What's more Iron Bull / Hissrad is suffering from PTSD, which was mostly glossed over and that would have played a part in how he views the world and perhaps make him attempt to see the Qun in a slightly less bad light. 

 

Which means Hissrad's / Iron Bull's word on Krem being an Aqun-Athlok as well as how Qunari now supposedly separate between sex and gender when they did not in Origins, might be a fabrication or it might be something said to make the Qun appear in a less bright light. 

 

Bottom line :-

 

j4cwf.jpg

 

So this whole thing with Iron Bull is, to me at least, a retcon not of the Qunari, but a retcon that makes them rather open ended so their direction can be decided in the future. 


  • soren4ever, Dutch et Dai Grepher aiment ceci

#219
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

I've been mad at that for a while.

 

Qunari got a massive SJW retcon in Inquisition.

Well, Newton's Third Law seems to have taken place since another retcon turned one of the Tamassran's, an all-female role, duties into being sex slaves for those of the Qun. That's pretty Anti-SJW. 



#220
DomeWing333

DomeWing333
  • Members
  • 546 messages

I am actually quite surprised at how many are taking the word of someone by the name of Hissrad, which translates into being a liar over someone by the name of Sten, which translates into a vanguard.

Iron Bull's role among the Qunari was "Hissrad"/liar. To the Inquisitor and his men, he's been nothing but upfront and straight-forward. Hell, he outright told us he was a spy within like 5 minutes of meeting him.

 

This isn't to say that his words are the pure, unadulterated truth when it comes to what the Qunari are. His information is colored by his relationship with the Qun. But Bull is more informative and knowledgeable about how the Qun operates because he works behind the scenes, whereas Sten just mindlessly reiterates what the Qun has taught him. It's like the different between asking a jaded teacher how a school works and asking a model student how a school works. The model student might give a more straightforward answer, but it won't be the whole story; the teacher can give you a more detailed answer, but it'll be given a certain way because of how he feels about it.

 

Well, Newton's Third Law seems to have taken place since another retcon turned one of the Tamassran's, an all-female role, duties into being sex slaves for those of the Qun. That's pretty Anti-SJW. 

All are slaves under the Qun. The fact that some of them are used for sex makes little difference.



#221
Winged Silver

Winged Silver
  • Members
  • 703 messages

Potentially that of the Qun, yes.

 

You are asking my personal opinion? Well, assuming the fabric of society is the reason the Qun dictates gender roles, and not just some arbitrary dictate of Koslun, then perhaps the rationale is that certain roles are filled better by certain sexes. Therefore they are defined by gender/sex. However, if a male were to claim to be female or even act female in order to fill a different role, or if a female were to pose as a male to fulfill those roles, it could conceivably create problems. First, the role would not be fulfilled adequately and the role would fail because of the faulty placement of the person posing as the opposite sex. Second, if such behavior were tolerated of some individuals, then others in society may attempt this as well in order to escape the responsibilities of their own roles rather than do as required and embrace their roles faithfully. This would of course lead to the complete collapse of the civilization and the "body" that is the Qun. Could you imagine Qunari soldiers claiming to be female in order to avoid battles for whatever reason? Intolerable.

 

We agree that those are your beliefs. There is no detailed source in the game explaining this issue. All we have to go on are the words of The Sten and The Iron Bull. My only point was that you were projecting your beliefs onto the Qun. While it is possible you are correct about the Qun, there is no evidence that you are correct. I on the other hand, do have evidence. The Sten's words are clear. His credibility, solid. The Iron Bull's words are sly. His credibility, in doubt. The most likely case is that The Sten is correct about the belief structure in which he has full confidence. It is unlikely The Iron Bull is correct about the belief structure he has strayed from in the past, questioned, wants to change, and does not want to see spread to Orlais or Ferelden.

 

I wasn't comparing Krem to the baker. I was citing an example of how the Qunari do not tolerate a baker claiming to be a warrior even if he is male. It is therefore less likely they would tolerate Krem claiming to be a male warrior. The point is about the Qunari belief system. Also, baker could be a gender-neutral role. I don't believe anything states it is female-only. The Qunari do not let them self-determine their fate. So it stands to reason they would not let someone like Krem determine that they are male warriors either.

 

They can find fault with my line of thinking all they want. In such a debate I would quote scripture to prove their religious fervor to be weak and their beliefs to be incorrect. It is the same case with the Qun. Take Gatt for example. He and The Iron Bull know each other and have a history. Gatt outright confesses that he struggles with some parts of the Qun, and that he remains loyal to the Qun because he believes that if he leaves then the parts he doesn't like will never change. This proves that Gatt believes the Qun can and should be changed. Does his friend The Iron Bull believe the same? I don't think that is ever confirmed outright, but there may have been a part of the game where The Iron Bull suggested it. So again, can Hissrad be trusted to portray the Qun accurately? Krem may or may not have asked about the Qun's position on transgenders, but The Iron Bull mentions it regardless. The reasons I stated are still possibilities, and Krem even voices that the Qunari might not be all bad based on what The Iron Bull said about the matter. Also keep in mind that The Iron Bull mentions this in response to the Inquisitor asking about it. So that could have been his reason for talking about it, to smooth things over before any feelings got hurt. The Iron Bull is quite protective of Krem. Questioning him about this later proves this. The Iron Bull insists that Krem is a man...

 

And this reminds me of something else The Iron Bull says. In my mage playthrough he says that he has horns, my mage can shoot fireballs out of his butt, and that because of this they aren't in a position to go around deciding what is normal. But isn't this exactly what the Qun does? Decide what is truth?

 

His reason for submitting to reeducation could have been that he was desperate to find purpose and place in the world, or to alleviate his guilt. Also, he underwent reeducation years before the events of Inquisition. He could have changed since then, and it is his statements in the game that we are questioning here. Perhaps at the time of reeducation The Iron Bull would not have seen Krem as a man. Also, if he truly believed in the Qun during the events of Inquisition, then there would be no choice to save The Chargers or let them die. The Iron Bull would always choose to let them die. I agree that the difference between The Sten and The Iron Bull does not indicate one is correct while the other is not. My claim was that what each one said contradict, and thus one must be correct and the other incorrect. Based on their character traits, I believe The Sten is the more likely Qunari to accurately represent the Qun.

 

"But Krem isn't a female under the Qun." Your opinion, not the Qun's. As I pointed out, merely claiming to be something and filling the roles is not enough. Roles are determined by those in charge, not the individuals who fill them. If The Sten says the Warden must be lying about being a woman, he is referring to her biological sex. He is basically saying the Warden is either a biological male, or not a warrior. This is because biological females cannot be warriors under the Qun.

 

Also, as I wrote in another post, if a female can become a warrior simply by claiming to be a male and living as such, then the rule banning females from being warriors is completely worthless and unnecessary. There is no reason to have it, and thus no reason for females to pretend to be males. Now, personally, I know that the Qun is a lie, but the Qunari don't believe that it is. Either they uphold their rules in full, or they dance around their rules in order to achieve what the rules are designed to prevent. They violate the spirit of the rule.

 

It's like having a rule that says only mules can carry packages for delivery, but we will allow the Qunari who want to deliver packages themselves to do so by merely recognizing them as mules first. Also, this requires them to sleep in the stables in order to consistently fill the role of a mule.

 

I think the idea is that those who chose to identify as something other than they were born would be doing so out of a sense of being true to themselves, and not for the personal gain you're speaking of. Then again, if someone is too weak/inept at fighting, the Qun wouldn't put them in the role of a warrior in the first place. So it's unlikely there would be any sort of major collapse simply due to this. 

 

Sten's credibility is your own take on his words. You don't know his life, so you make assumptions. I don't view either of them as the 'ultimate' Qunari. They both possess nuances of the religion. Ignoring the Iron Bull simply because he doesn't fit your own idea of what Qunari culture is willfully ignoring other facets of the Qun. What you may perceive as his lack of devotion might in fact be more common in Par Vollen than we think, if we were to base all our ideas on Sten, which is limiting at best.

 

Krem isn't self determining, though, that's the thing. If Krem wanted to be an artisan, and be a male, the Qun would dictate that he couldn't be both male and artisan. Krem choice of identifying as male only works because he also would fit into the role the Qun dictates as being acceptable for certain males. 

 

Gatt voicing his his concerns over some aspects of the Qun doesn't make him any less Qunari than Sten. That's part of how religion tends to work. People interpret it differently, and agree and disagree with various parts of it. You can't dictate what behavior is always 'right' or 'wrong' (by most modern people's standards, the actions of the Spanish conquistadors in their expansion into the Americas would be utterly reprehensible, but at the time, their skirting of the moral guidelines set by their religion allowed them to aggressively expand, with minimal flak from critics). So it's just illogical to assume one character fully embodies the entire Qunari society. To that end, one has to assume both Sten and the Iron Bull are subconsciously adding their own context when explaining the Qun (the few times that they do, anyhow). 

 

Even if you believe Sten to more accurately represent the Qun, the Iron Bull hasn't actually contradicted anything Sten says. They both worked in different branches of the Qunari society. It makes sense that they would act differently, and accordingly with their given positions. I would argue that the Iron Bull had similar mannerisms to Tallis. Would you say that Tallis is not a member of Qunari society, simply because she had social skills? 

 

You don't know that it isn't the Qun's opinion, regarding Krem's not being a female. Additionally, Sten isn't necessarily referring to her biology. You're adding your own assumptions to that. Given the in Origins there wasn't any sort of option to play as an androgynous character, it's assumed that the female warden has feminine characteristics. Sten could just as easily been referring to those, rather than whether or not the female warden has breasts.

 

You're oversimplifying what it means to choose to identify as one gender or another. A woman wouldn't go "yo I'm a dude, lemme fight" and then proceed to fight, without changing other aspects of her life to reflect her new status as male. If the woman chose to identify as a male, he'd undergo the process of changing his entire lifestyle to reflect that choice. 

 

Religions skirt around the rules all the time. It's not new. I'll go back to my real world example of the Spanish Conquistadors. They had a document known as the 'requerimiento' which 'gave' them religious permission to take over the area, despite the fact the native people already lived upon the land. I should probably mention that they read this in Spanish, to a group of people who didn't speak the language, threatening them with seizure of land and people if they didn't swear sovereignty to the King and Queen. This, in their eyes, was justified, as stupid as it sounds. I don't see why the Qun can't also be stupid in certain ways. They haven't proven themselves to be overly enlightened in other areas. 

 

An interesting analogy. Perhaps that is indeed what the Qun allows. Just because it sounds stupid doesn't mean it's not the case. There's plenty of ideas in various religious texts that sound odd to our modern minds. Doesn't mean they weren't ever considered important. 

 

So as far as the Iron Bull accurately reflecting the Qun...if you're being realistic, he does. He is not the archetype of a Qunari, nor was he meant to be. Sten, more likely than not, acted the way he did due to his military training, rather than just solely acting upon the Qun. Appropriately, the Iron Bull acted as his training has taught him - far more casual, and less intimidating. 



#222
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Well, Newton's Third Law seems to have taken place since another retcon turned one of the Tamassran's, an all-female role, duties into being sex slaves for those of the Qun. That's pretty Anti-SJW. 

They're no more enslaved than every other qunari (and arguably less than the saarebas), and the sexual role isn't viewed as tarnishing them in any way. "Sex slave" isn't entirely wrong, but it's far from a perfect description of how they and the rest of the Qun view their jobs. Besides which, for pragmatism's sake if nothing else, it seems like there'd be male practitioners for this particular bit of priest's work; maybe most priest work they could view a woman as better suited for, but this seems like neither gender could handle everyone.



#223
BansheeOwnage

BansheeOwnage
  • Members
  • 11 226 messages

I meant that spending a lot of resources on exploring "Marriage Across Thedas" like some kind of anthropology report might not be the wisest expenditure.  I don't really care either way if you can actually propose/get married in the game.  If it's in the game and it's cute, yay!  And I would, of course, hope that everybody could get something if possible.  But I just don't think it's worthwhile to make it a Big Deal in the game.

I don't need them to explore anything. I just thought it would be a nice thing to add, for multiple reasons. I don't need it to be more than that. And sometimes, not making a big deal of things is the best way to make a big deal about them ;)


  • Hanako Ikezawa aime ceci

#224
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

The fact that there are walls of texts that can't even agree on what the Qunari even are is enough for me to forget about the Qunari. Lore shouldn't be this hard. This is supposed to be fun.. simple, comprehensible info for a game. Now it's a mess. Who knew that a conversation about Sten of all people could be this convoluted? Next thing I know, his famous "No" line is going to really mean "Yes". I give up :)


  • soren4ever, Bayonet Hipshot, Dutch et 1 autre aiment ceci

#225
DomeWing333

DomeWing333
  • Members
  • 546 messages

The fact that there are walls of texts that can't even agree on what the Qunari even are is enough for me to forget about the Qunari. Someone needs to get their sh*t together. Lore shouldn't be this hard. This is supposed to be fun.. simple, comprehensible info for a game. Now it's a mess. Who knew that a conversation about Sten of all people could be this convoluted?

This is the internet. Everything is convoluted. There are walls of text on here about whether the naked figure on the Archon staff is Andraste and whether or not that's okay.


  • eyezonlyii et Thane4Ever aiment ceci