I'm inclined to take a moral stand, but I'm not always resolute
My life in a sentence.
I'm inclined to take a moral stand, but I'm not always resolute
My life in a sentence.
depends on the type of hairstyles. I'm not going to pay money for even worse hairstyles.
I've paid for cosmetic items (SWTOR hair, eye color, ect), but it allowed me to see what I was buying and pick and choose
nope, never .
The level of work put into it would really have to be something for me to consider it. I dislike the options we have, but not enough that some more would make me care to spend money. Now, if the options were much more extensive, as well as dynamic (like the way Sera's hair is animated), then I might consider it, since that's a bit more work. But if it's just another group of static hair helmets, then it's not really worth the bother, and it'd be annoying that it's not free.
No. Hair options like that should be put in the game for free.
Sure, if I liked it.
The level of work put into it would really have to be something for me to consider it. I dislike the options we have, but not enough that some more would make me care to spend money. Now, if the options were much more extensive, as well as dynamic (like the way Sera's hair is animated), then I might consider it, since that's a bit more work. But if it's just another group of static hair helmets, then it's not really worth the bother, and it'd be annoying that it's not free.
They make one and it ends up being 20 more variations of bald and shaved (all with sideburns of course) ![]()
Will wait for the modders to make their magic.
No thanks. I'm not giving EAware any more of my money. After Inquisition, consider it lesson learned.
probably would, I think its stupid Qunari with horns don't have hair lol. I also think Humans, Dwarves, and Elfs sharing the same hairstyle was the worst design decision ever. But I understand the Qunari lacking in style a lot more than the other races since they weren't originally going to be a race from what I understand.
Probably...mostly just to support Bioware. I'd rather pay 3$ for a mounts pack where a giant lizard looks and scurries like a lizard...or a giant spider mount that skitters like a spider. Or 3$ that adds fade-touched herbs along with special recipes to create new and unique potions/grenades - a resurrection potion...bombs that deal spirit/frost/lightning damage as examples. They could put hair in with those two things I'll happily cough up 10$.
However to complain something should be free is asinine.

I would like some nice hairstyles and if this is what it takes to get some then so be it. Why did Bioware think 100% of the population likes shaved hairstyles, side burns and baldness? Where did that get that information from?
I don't think I would buy such a pack based on principle actually. New hair and makeup was always something that was added very easily through mods (there may even be those mods now for all I know... haven't checked).
Selling a pack that contained this stuff just reinforces them that cutting modding ability was a "good" financial decision. As such I don't think I could support that and would likely vote with my wallet not to buy it. DA:I is a much lesser game with far less replayability because of its poorer modding access.
The DLC they do try to sell had better be rather stellar, because there is little reason to replay this game since 99% of it is going to be exactly the same each time.
Sadly yes I would. I would actually pay a lot more for better hairstyles. I have no idea what they were thinking. They put all this detail into character creation and added the worse hair in the world.
That's exactly why you shouldn't pay extra for it. It should already be included.
Now? I've finished the game. I don't think I'll even pay for BE. Not for any moral stance or anything, but the game is done. Over. Fini.
Now if they announce an Awakenings sized expansion... I'd have to think about it.
Not for just hairstyles. The character creator is insanely detailed already, to the point where I'm actually a little overwhelmed with all the jawbone pinching and different freaking eyelash-types. I only have two characters, a male and a female, and I happen to like both their hair. If it added new armor & weapons, then yeah. There's priced gun skins in most mainstream shooters, so that'd be one of the smaller sins I'd secretly commit.
Besides, I don't know how BioWare "owes" anyone different hairstyles for free. Demanding cash for just hairstyles would be dispicable for different reasons, mind you, but it's simply style. You win some, you lose some. Personally I hate how there's one single freaking armor for rogues (admittedly variantions range from with or without pants) and no beards that don't mess up the complete facial structure in DAO, I didn't demand free DLC as "compensation" for that. And I won't.
P.S.: I'm willing to pay up to 1,000,000$ to remove the skull cap from under the Inquisitor's Hat. And then take a really long shower, rocking back and forth.
NOPE!

That's definitely cheaper than paying thirty silver at the Pearl.
Hell, at The Blooming Rose you needed 50 silvers for the cheap treatment...
*snip*
P.S.: I'm willing to pay up to 1,000,000$ to remove the skull cap from under the Inquisitor's Hat. And then take a really long shower, rocking back and forth.

Why pay for this? we can just wait for mods ![]()
I doubt it, now I can't speak in absolutes because things change. I don't think they could add enough styles to the limitations I believe the older consoles put on the game and the other factor that causes me to have high skepticism you can see in this very thread with "they took it out of the game for they must have already been there" theories since they did away with Day 1 DLC, I can't see them making a decision that this community will have the same reaction too.