I like the overall story a lot, yes, but I don't like what ultimately became of the Reapers after the ending. They went from evil lovecraftian gods that we don't and can't understand to AI-controlled servants of life with questionable methods. This is neither satisfying nor cohesive.
In the first two chapters of the trilogy, the Reapers treat you and the other organics with utter contempt. They are gods, we are ants. Their motives were not explained and did not need to be : the "reaping" is how they reproduce, and that's reason enough. The galaxy is their garden, civilisations are their vegetables. That's it. They do not care about you nor feel the need to explain anything : they are a monstrous threat that will destroy you and "life" because they are superior beings and it benefits them.
That's, at least, the impression I had after the absolutely amazing exchange with Sovereign on Virmire :
"Rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh, you touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding. [...] There is a realm of existence so far beyond your own you cannot even imagine it. I am beyond your comprehension. I am Sovereign. [...] Organic life is nothing but a genetic mutation, an accident. Your lives are measured in years and decades. You wither and die. We are eternal, the pinnacle of evolution and existence. Before us, you are nothing. Your extinction is inevitable. We are the end of everything. [...] Confidence born of ignorance. The cycle cannot be broken. [...]The pattern has repeated itself more times than you can fathom. Organic civilizations rise, evolve, advance, and at the apex of their glory they are extinguished. The Protheans were not the first. They did not create the Citadel. They did not forge the mass relays. They mere found them - the legacy of my kind. [...] Your civilization is based on the technology of the mass relays. Our technology. By using it, your civilization develops along the paths we desire. We impose order on the chaos of organic life. You exist because we allow it, and you will end because we demand it. [...] My kind transcends your very understanding. We are each a nation - independent, free of all weakness. You cannot grasp the nature of our existence. [...]We have no beginning. We have no end. We are infinite. Millions of years after your civilization has been eradicated and forgotten, we will endure.We are legion. [...] The time of our return is coming. Our numbers will darken the sky of every world. You cannot escape your doom. [...] Your words are as empty as your future. I am the Vanguard of your destruction. This exchange is over..."
Someone said, on the gamefaqs board, that "that whole exchange felt like having a conversation with Satan". That made me laugh, but I see what he meant : Sovereign presents itself as the "Vanguard of our destruction" and is utterly condescending and arrogant about it (and people say the Leviathans are arrogant...). He will destroy us, he doesn't care and he is very threatening about it : "You exist because we allow it, and you will end because we demand it" ; "Before us, you are nothing. Your extinction is inevitable" ; "You cannot escape your doom". And most importantly, he proclaims that the Reapers are "the pinnacle of evolution and existence, [...] the end of everything".
Most of Harbinger trash-talk in ME2 is of the same vein. Take what he says in Arrival, for instance : "You fight against inevitability, dust struggling against cosmic winds. This seems a victory to you, a star system sacrificed. But even now, your greatest civilizations are doomed to fall. Your leaders will beg to serve us. [...] Know this as you die in vain; your time will come. Your species will fall. Prepare yourselves for the Arrival". THIS is what I loved about the Reapers. They were threatening, god-like monsters that had nothing but contempt for our galaxy and our civilisations.
Then comes ME3's ending, where we learn that, in fact, the Reapers don't even have the free will that some of the "lesser" beings have (at least in the ME universe) and are simply obeying an AI that is programmed to preserve life at all cost. So what Sovereign and Harbinger really meant, I guess, is : "Look, it's not that me and the rest of the Reapers particularly want to destroy you. We don't care and would gladly leave you alone. It's just that you will inevitably create synthetics that will wipe out your entire species and perhaps even life itself (though that bit is unclear). I'm very pro-life so I cannot let this happen. So you see, I'm actually destroying you in order to save you from yourself and for the greater-good of life. I hope there are no hard feelings between us. With love, Sovy and Harby".
The tone simply doesn't fit. The condescending, menacing and immensely powerful "vanguards of destruction" that treat organics like meaningless creatures suddenly become obedient servants of life. "We are eternal, the pinnacle of evolution and existence. Before us, you are nothing. Your extinction is inevitable. We are the end of everything" becomes " We are the flawed solution an AI came up with to preserve life at all cost from the inevitable organics-synthetics conflict that arise when civilisation reach a certain point". If that was the intent all along, the Reapers's speeches should have been written entirely differently (Imo). I also think it would have been better is they didn't talk or show emotions at all, like machines that do what needs to be done.
All in all, I'm really not a fan of this change of tone, and retrospectively, it really lessens my appreciation of the main villains of the trilogy. I'm a Lovecraft fan and would have been more satisfied if the Reapers had stayed precisely that : lovecraftian (even though they talk
).