67 réponses à ce sujet

[Zorinho20_CRO]

Why don't you play the single player campaign?  It's actually a great deal of fun.  I love multiplayer but I think the single player campaign is more fun.

It is,but in sp mode you can't show off your 1337 skills

[Senor Pez]

Does playing single player increase my leaderboard standing?

[scene_cachet]

Just a heads up: bloodborne can be played in coop =)

 

And PvP.

[Courtnehh]

This is a similar way of thinking to my friend that will only play games he can get 100% gamerscore for. I don't understand the appeal, he will flat out refuse to play fantastic games on this basis.

[Medallian]

Why don't you play the single player campaign?  It's actually a great deal of fun.  I love multiplayer but I think the single player campaign is more fun.

lol because leader board because power.. I want to see how strong I can get my char I am obsessive with it a bit to be honest

[Shadohz]

Wait do you really have to purchase the SP content in order to get access to tge MP content?

The only way something like that would ever happen is if the content that was released in DLC also had a Compatibility pack released as well. If one player has assets that don't exist for other players then it's likely to cause issues. The only way that wouldn't be true is if the content were already installed with the original release and the DLC was nothing more than hidden unlock commands. I'm sure EA doesn't want to go down that route again. lol

[Shadohz]

Does playing single player increase my leaderboard standing?

TBH. DAI should've had all the features that ME3 got (but were screwed up on by design). The War Assets feature would've worked great with the map layout. Completing MP missions could've added to your SP prowess over the land. They could probably still pull it off with a bit of tweaking and adding new missions for SP.

As I was playing the SP last month I was really thinking hard if they really intended some of those ME3 to carry over to DAI but because it was poorly received they got gun-shy.

[ALTBOULI]

lol because leader board because power.. I want to see how strong I can get my char I am obsessive with it a bit to be honest

[Shelled]

why the **** would I pay for single player dlc in a game that has 0 side-content to begin with. **** that ****.

[Medallian]

The only way something like that would ever happen is if the content that was released in DLC also had a Compatibility pack released as well. If one player has assets that don't exist for other players then it's likely to cause issues. The only way that wouldn't be true is if the content were already installed with the original release and the DLC was nothing more than hidden unlock commands. I'm sure EA doesn't want to go down that route again. lol

dont think this is the case with a patch thats 1.4+ GBs large and a DLC that's the same equivalent .... I cant see this data already being in the game.....

[Shadohz]

dont think this is the case with a patch thats 1.4+ GBs large and a DLC that's the same equivalent .... I cant see this data already being in the game.....

That was the point of my comment Med. I was saying that if a SP DLC contained exclusive MP content, then other players would be required to install Compatibility packs. Boogz was just pulling a leg. 

[Shadohz]

why the **** would I pay for single player dlc in a game that has 0 side-content to begin with. **** that ****.

Facts. I didn't much care for the off-shoot missions and hopping on/off the map to get around. One big expansive map/world would have been great. You could fight to establish and have to maintain territory via side-quests. Toss in a few more factions with specific antagonists who are trying to make a power play during your game. The less territory or influence you had by end-game could effect your outcome (also tossing in MP games across various maps). That would've been nice. One can dream, yes?

[N172]

dont think this is the case with a patch thats 1.4+ GBs large and a DLC that's the same equivalent .... I cant see this data already being in the game.....

Thats Singleplayer-Maps, -Meshes, -Textures, -Dialogue, -Voiceover, -Soundeffects, -Scripts and so on.
To put some stuff from the new DLC in MP it whould not require as much space as the whole SP-DLC.

BWs/EAs strategy with DAI is obviously the same as with ME3:
- game: 50-70 bucks
- SP-DLC: ~5-15 bucks
- MP-DLC and other MP-Content: free
- chests can be bought using real Money

Since there is nothing indicating that it changed, so any talk about paid MP-Content is just an unlikely wild speculation.

[Medallian]

Thats Singleplayer-Maps, -Meshes, -Textures, -Dialogue, -Voiceover, -Soundeffects, -Scripts and so on.
To put some stuff from the new DLC in MP it whould not require as much space as the whole SP-DLC.

BWs/EAs strategy with DAI is obviously the same as with ME3:
- game: 50-70 bucks
- SP-DLC: ~5-15 bucks
- MP-DLC and other MP-Content: free
- chests can be bought using real Money

Since there is nothing indicating that it changed, so any talk about paid MP-Content is just an unlikely wild speculation.

yeah but the patch was 1.4 GB the day before the DLC realse so coldnt they dd it in that way>?

[McPartyson]

If you play MP only, the 15 bux on the DLC would be a waste. I believe all the content is already included in Patch 6. The DLC simply unlocks the zone for SP.

[Teophne]

yeah but the patch was 1.4 GB the day before the DLC realse so coldnt they dd it in that way>?

 

Downloaded it for PS3 a few hours ago. Mine was 700MB

[Medallian]

single player DLC was over a gig

[Zorinho20_CRO]

single player DLC was over a gig

1.5 GB on PC