Dwarven Longsword has c.170 base damage, so I think Song of the Marshes it is...
Good axe, very similar to the Firm Tournament Axe in damage but has a nice 10% apply poison change.
It's now my favourite one handed Axe.
I just checked and right you are. For some reason I mistook that 170 for 120. Good thing it was that and not the other way around. 
Apparently then the Song of the marshes isn't a new weapon after all.
"armour". I know its a brit thing, but I laugh every time I see that. Your measuring system is superior to ours, but you guys suck at spelling. What is wrong with armor?
Please stop making a mockery of the English language. If you don't like it then make up your own.
"armour". I know its a brit thing, but I laugh every time I see that. Your measuring system is superior to ours, but you guys suck at spelling. What is wrong with armor?
Very amusing. I would hate this discussion to lead to rancour, but 'armour' is the most fitting and appropriate spelling variation on this forum. Why? Because this forum is Canadian, hence it follows many of the marvellous spelling traditions that flow from Queen's English 
.
I recognise that many 'American' style words were in common parlance in the England of the seventeenth century before spelling variations were formalised by Johnson and Webster respectively, creating the spelling divide we now experience.
Canadian English honours much of British English spelling, though I understand they are fairly flexible about it given their neighbours outnumber them 10:1.
I wouldn't harbour any concerns about it though as most British and Canadian readers can figure out what Americans are saying. 
I would hate this discussion to lead to rancour, but 'armour' is the most fitting and appropriate spelling variation on this forum. Why? Because ...
Isn't it properly "armour" because English was from, well England, where English originated from, and that's how the English spell it.
One could consider American "English" to be a dialect, as it's essentially a corrupted subset of the main branch. Likewise i wouldn't consider Canadian English, or what Kiwis and okkers speak to be proper English either - although at least the latter two do spell it Armour and not Armor[sic] 
Very amusing. I would hate this discussioun to lead to rancour, but 'armour' is the moust fitting and approupriate spelling variatioun oun this fourum. Why? Because this fourum is Canadian, hence it foullouws many ouf the marvellous spelling traditiouns that flouw from Queen's English
I recougnise that many 'American' style wourds were in coummoun parlance in the England ouf the seventeenth century before spelling variatiouns were fourmalised by Jouhnsoun and Webster respectively, creating the spelling divide we now experience.
Canadian English hounours much ouf British English spelling, though I understand they are fairly flexible about it given their neighbours outnumber them 10:1.
I wouldn't harbour any councerns about it though as moust British and Canadian readers can figure out what Americans are saying.
It that better?
Isn't it properly "armour" because English was from, well England, where English originated from, and that's how the English spell it.
One could consider American "English" to be a dialect, as it's essentially a corrupted subset of the main branch. Likewise i wouldn't consider Canadian English, or what Kiwis and okkers speak to be proper English either - although at least the latter two do spell it Armour and not Armor[sic]
Dang how derailed has this post gotten this s so messed up how people seem to have to talk about the most idiotic thing in some ones post that has nothing to do with the topic in he slightest smh.
Pons asinorum, in conversations one thing leads to another. It's a required element for any fruitful conversation.
If you've ever in a conversation said: "This reminds me of.." You know it's happening.
In the forums this has another very important function - prevention of multiple threads (so called stupid questions) in which someone asks a question and another answers it only to receive another post in which the original poster says thanks. This leads to cluttering of forums which eventually kills the forum.
Another thing that supports the topic derailment is the "How old are you" thread. It derailed a LOT from the original idea, but it's the first thread I've seen people mention their liking for a single thread. To make it short: people love those threads.
Pons asinorum, in conversations one thing leads to another. It's a required element for any fruitful conversation.
If you've ever in a conversation said: "This reminds me of.." You know it's happening.
In the forums this has another very important function - prevention of multiple threads (so called stupid questions) in which someone asks a question and another answers it only to receive another post in which the original poster says thanks. This leads to cluttering of forums which eventually kills the forum.
Another thing that supports the topic derailment is the "How old are you" thread. It derailed a LOT from the original idea, but it's the first thread I've seen people mention their liking for a single thread. To make it short: people love those threads.
Will we ever have "Claymore vs Wraith"like thread 
Quoted for the irony in you not posting something with the topic in the slightest.Dang how derailed has this post gotten this s so messed up how people seem to have to talk about the most idiotic thing in some ones post that has nothing to do with the topic in he slightest smh.
standard > metric
armor > armour
Slang wins on this one.
Here, I got (have) a peace offering for half the people in this thread.
armouire.
Dang how derailed has this post gotten this s so messed up how people seem to have to talk about the most idiotic thing in some ones post that has nothing to do with the topic in he slightest smh.
Take notes.
standard > metric
armor > armour
Slang wins on this one.
Here, I got (have) a peace offering for half the people in this thread.
Out of the 1.2 billion people who speak English, less than 300 million speak American English.
Your rogue Nation just forgot how to spell properly which is understandble with the high percentage of rednecks in your population.
Long live the Queen!
Out of the 1.2 billion people who speak English, less than 300 million speak American English.
Your rogue Nation just forgot how to spell properly which is understandble with the high percentage of rednecks in your population.
Long live the Queen!
All really down to Noah Webster and his dictionary 'dumbing down' (as it was at the time) 'King's English',
on the basis that Americans found the spelling too complicated and he would simplify some of it for them...
Interestingly, some of his simplification proposals such as:
Were ignored...
Out of the 1.2 billion people who speak English, less than 300 million speak American English.
Your rogue Nation just forgot how to spell properly which is understandble with the high percentage of rednecks in your population.
Long live the Queen!
No we improved it. We like our U like we like our tea. Thrown out for clarity.
Basically they rounded up all the convicts and dyslexics in the UK/EU and put them on boats and shipped them over to the America's. So it's no big surprise that majority of their population still can't spell properly or measure things in standard that makes sense.
We're probably getting a little off topic here aren't we...
Basically they rounded up all the convicts and dyslexics in the UK/EU and put them on boats and shipped them over to the America's. So it's no big surprise that majority of their population still can't spell properly or measure things in standard that makes sense.
Actually, they sent most of the convicts to Australia, where they spell things like you do.
Actually, they sent most of the convicts to Australia, where they spell things like you do.
Actually, USA was the biggest UK/EU penal colony to date.
By the time England started sending convicts to Australia they had already sent all of all dyslexics to the Americas and that's why the Australian convicts can spell properly.
Dang how derailed has this post gotten this s so messed up how people seem to have to talk about the most idiotic thing in some ones post that has nothing to do with the topic in he slightest smh.
Being non-american, non-british, non-native english speaker I'm in no way biased here.
I tend to use Armour rather than Armor, just like I use Parkour rather than Parkor.
On metric vs. Imperial, I get that 12 inches makes a feet while 3 feet makes a yard, or that's how I've understood it. ~4500 feet or ~1500 yards makes a mile.
Still, it's more convenient that 10 millimetres makes a centimetre, 100 centimeters makes a metre and 1000 metres makes a kilometre.
Oh, predictive text input thingies made it metre instead of meter. I don't know which is the correct term there as the predictor accepts both. Don't make me a Brit or US supporter cause of that if there's that dialect difference in those words.
Retour en haut