The tale of Iloren surely illustrates In Exile's point. Iloren had no recorded involvement outside of keeping his clan from the blight and protecting them from Darkspawn. He and his tale would be known only to the Dalish, not to the rest of thedas.
Inquisitor Ameridan
#401
Posté 29 mars 2015 - 02:41
#402
Posté 29 mars 2015 - 02:51
The tale of Iloren surely illustrates In Exile's point. Iloren had no recorded involvement outside of keeping his clan from the blight and protecting them from Darkspawn. He and his tale would be known only to the Dalish, not to the rest of thedas.
I'm pretty sure that Andrastian humans wouldn't have many tales of elven heroes (they don't even seem to care enough to remember the ones who do exist), but that doesn't change the absence of Dalish heroes in a narrative where the main character can be Dalish and is able to interact with other Dalish, which is the point.
- Uccio aime ceci
#403
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 12:51
Because the Chantry is one of the major institutions of its closests neighbor? Not just a potential enemy, but a potential ally? Having their own religion doesn't mean they shouldn't seek to live harmoniously with others, and it certainly doesn't mean they should ban other faiths like they did.
You're putting the burden of diplomatic relations on the elves over the Chantry and Orlais?
#404
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 12:59
When they actively spurn relations with other nations and deny aid to their neighbors when they are threatened with total annihilation, you're damn right I place he burden of the break down in relations on them.You're putting the burden of diplomatic relations on the Dalish?
- TK514, Steelcan, ComedicSociopathy et 1 autre aiment ceci
#405
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 03:01
You're putting the burden of diplomatic relations on the elves over the Chantry and Orlais?
Diplomacy is a 2 way street. Say what you want about the Chantry but the Dalish of that time did not even try for peace.
#406
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 06:09
Because the Chantry is one of the major institutions of its closests neighbor? Not just a potential enemy, but a potential ally? Having their own religion doesn't mean they shouldn't seek to live harmoniously with others, and it certainly doesn't mean they should ban other faiths like they did.
You do realize that the Dales are much closer to the Frostbacks than most of Orlais, right? That they were threatened too?
Having their own religion means it is their own religion. There is no need to go and alter your beliefs just to kiss someones ass. If the chantry is not willing to incorporate elven pantheon to their doctrine I see no reason for the elves to do it either. Besides, religious doctrines are usually rather strict, I doubt chantry would have settled for anything less than total abandoning elven faith. Banning andrastian faith fits perfectly to the attitude of the chantry, why settle for anything less?
As for the threat, elves were more mobile than orlesian. They could have maneuvered giving the avvar god room to meet the orlesians first. Then later they could have supported them, just enough to keep the hakkon at bay.
#407
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 06:43
#408
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 07:37
My first inquisitor was a male elf mage who was open to both the creators and the maker...creepy. This original inquisitor didn't have red hair and a Sylaise vallaslin right? ![]()
#409
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 09:05
Diplomacy is a 2 way street. Say what you want about the Chantry but the Dalish of that time did not even try for peace.
We're told in the Emerald Graves what sort of "overtures of peace" these were- templars and missionaries.
- LobselVith8 aime ceci
#410
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 10:36
They don't need to change their religion, but allowing those who wanted to to follow Ameridan's syncretic faith would have had a positive effect on relations between the two countries. Instead, they outlawed chantries and exiled missionaries, which says more about the insecurities of the Dales' rulers than what the average elf wanted.Having their own religion means it is their own religion. There is no need to go and alter your beliefs just to kiss someones ass. If the chantry is not willing to incorporate elven pantheon to their doctrine I see no reason for the elves to do it either. Besides, religious doctrines are usually rather strict, I doubt chantry would have settled for anything less than total abandoning elven faith. Banning andrastian faith fits perfectly to the attitude of the chantry, why settle for anything less?
More maneuverable? Are you kidding? That's baseless bullshit, you really think they could move their entire country out of the way? Or that Hakkon would make a beeline for the Orlesians instead of going after the elves? The Avvar don't care, their all just lowlanders to them.As for the threat, elves were more mobile than orlesian. They could have maneuvered giving the avvar god room to meet the orlesians first. Then later they could have supported them, just enough to keep the hakkon at bay.
#411
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 10:39
They don't need to change their religion, but allowing those who wanted to to follow Ameridan's syncretic faith would have had a positive effect on relations between the two countries. Instead, they outlawed chantries and exiled missionaries, which says more about the insecurities of the Dales' rulers than what the average elf wanted.
The problem is that the Andrastians are inherently aggressive towards anyone who follows "false gods." If they were given an inch, they'd soon try to take a mile.
- Exile Isan, LobselVith8 et Uccio aiment ceci
#412
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:00
If they're converting by force, that'd be a problem but if they're finding willing converts then that speaks more to how satisfied the elves are with their faith than any overreaching on the Chantry's part.The problem is that the Andrastians are inherently aggressive towards anyone who follows "false gods." If they were given an inch, they'd soon try to take a mile.
#413
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:01
If they're converting by force, that'd be a problem but if they're finding willing converts then that speaks more to how satisfied the elves are with their faith than any overreaching on the Chantry's part.
And then they start locking up mages and demanding that other elves convert. It's a slippery slope whenever you're dealing with an expansionist religion.
- Exile Isan et LobselVith8 aiment ceci
#414
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:04
They don't need to change their religion, but allowing those who wanted to to follow Ameridan's syncretic faith would have had a positive effect on relations between the two countries. Instead, they outlawed chantries and exiled missionaries, which says more about the insecurities of the Dales' rulers than what the average elf wanted.
Proselytizing religions don't mix well with non-proselytizing. Plenty of RL examples. But there already are whole groups of syncretic elves- those like Ameridan could go to the alienages if their native culture bothered them so much.
- LobselVith8 aime ceci
#415
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:07
They don't need to change their religion, but allowing those who wanted to to follow Ameridan's syncretic faith would have had a positive effect on relations between the two countries. Instead, they outlawed chantries and exiled missionaries, which says more about the insecurities of the Dales' rulers than what the average elf wanted.
So did the orlesians allow elven missionaries in their cities? If not then it would be rather one eyed view on matter don´t you think?
More maneuverable? Are you kidding? That's baseless bullshit, you really think they could move their entire country out of the way? Or that Hakkon would make a beeline for the Orlesians instead of going after the elves? The Avvar don't care, their all just lowlanders to them.
Elves, at least as much has been shown, have been rather mobile compared for instance to the heavily armored orlesians. And to move people is not the same thing as moving a country.
#416
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:29
So they should be exiled from their homeland for daring to have a difference of religious opinion?Proselytizing religions don't mix well with non-proselytizing. Plenty of RL examples. But there already are whole groups of syncretic elves- those like Ameridan could go to the alienages if their native culture bothered them so much.
#417
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:30
So they should be exiled from their homeland for daring to have a difference of religious opinion?
I said if it bothered them. I suppose they could stay and lead a social crusade to change everyone around them. That always turns out well.
- LobselVith8 aime ceci
#418
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:32
The elven religion is not a proselytizing one, they have no interest in converting non-elves as non-elves are not acknowledged in their faith. They have no missionaries.So did the orlesians allow elven missionaries in their cities? If not then it would be rather one eyed view on matter don´t you think?
As much as has been shown? What, the Dalish? They're nomads, the elves of the Dales were not.Elves, at least as much has been shown, have been rather mobile compared for instance to the heavily armored orlesians. And to move people is not the same thing as moving a country.
#419
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:34
I only ever said they and the Chantry should be tolerated, not that all elves need to convert or that Ameridan's type should try and make everyone hold their beliefs. They can coexist.I said if it bothered them. I suppose they could stay and lead a social crusade to change everyone around them. That always turns out well.
#420
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:35
I only ever said they and the Chantry should be tolerated, not that all elves need to convert or that Ameridan's type should try and make everyone hold their beliefs. They can coexist.
What I said about proselytizing and non-proselytizing applies. Co-existence in such cases rarely works out well over the long term.
- LobselVith8 aime ceci
#421
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:40
Would there be tensions? Yes, but forced religious conformity likewise escalates and rarely ends well in the long term. And an Andrastian presence within the Dales might have kept them from being so alienated from their neighbors as a whole.What I said about proselytizing and non-proselytizing applies. Co-existence in such cases rarely works out well over the long term.
#422
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 11:45
Would there be tensions? Yes, but forced religious conformity likewise escalates and rarely ends well in the long term. And an Andrastian presence within the Dales might have kept them from being so alienated from their neighbors as a whole.
More likely the opposite.
- LobselVith8 aime ceci
#423
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 12:00
A substantial portion of the population following a form of Andrastrian faith would have made it harder for their opponents to frame the elves as a whole as a quintessentially opposed other and easier for those inclined to find common ground.More likely the opposite.
It's certainly be a step up from setting themselves up to be hated like they did.
#424
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 12:27
A substantial portion of the population following a form of Andrastrian faith would have made it harder for their opponents to frame the elves as a whole as a quintessentially opposed other and easier for those inclined to find common ground.
It's certainly be a step up from setting themselves up to be hated like they did.
Did that work for the alienages?
- LobselVith8, The Baconer et Colonelkillabee aiment ceci
#425
Posté 30 mars 2015 - 12:30
Did that work for the alienages?
I think we have enough real life examples to know that no matter how much minorities try to be considered one of a certain group, when it comes down to it, they're always the outsiders and the first to be accused. The Dalish having an andrastian presence would have done absolutely diddly squat.





Retour en haut





