Corypheus's backstory is fantastic. He was also handled great up to and including Haven. But at one point Corypheus got butchered as a character with contradictory writing and personality. English is not my native language but I hope I've managed to get the point across. This turned out as a wall of text, so I apologize for that. Hopefully you are either bored enough, or interested enough in Corypheus as a character - to read all this.
Before I proceed any further let me ask you something.
A child in Africa is abducted from his family at the age of 8.
He is mistreated - taught to use firearms, and forced to kill people.
His life is now one of survival, he is a child soldier.
The question is now, is this child evil?
One of the things about good and evil not being universal truths - is because different cultures, or environments if you will, has different values, norms and morals. If 2 opposing alien tribes were seen fighting each other from a satellite on earth... how could we as a human observer, unbiased, decide which one of the tribes were right/wrong or good/evil?
Point is, Tevinter society is not as much evil as it is culturally different. It is a "might makes right" society seen from our own culture, and from our own society in real life. Lastly, look at these two general cultural views on morality:
A: (Todays western society) The weak are the victims, the strong and powerful are "the bad guys". Lets (at least pretend?) make life better for everyone.
B: The strong are virtuous has earned their right to rule, the weak are to blame themselves for being weak. Life is cruel.
I'd definitely argue that B is more in touch with reality and the nature of humans, if not also life itself if you take a look at every non-human species on our planet.
Conclusion A: We have a person born and raised in an elitist and social-darwinistic society like Tevinter. He is, as a result - who he is due to being shaped by this culture and upbringing. The way he looks at life, the strong needs to rule the weak. Strength and power is a virtuous goal. It is simply the way of life.
Lets now go to the next part. He sought the Golden City, and was betrayed in doing so. Though I'm not sure if Corypheus was aware, he was in fact tricked there. So... the world - with players outside the visible "chess board", screws him over. He is then asleep for centuries. He wakes up a monster, to a world gone weak and decadent. Completely alien in comparison to the world he inhabited. Can you imagine yourself falling asleep in cryo and waking up in a thousand years? Only to see what values you have as a person being on its head? And worse, your country being reduced to, say, one city or county?
Conclusion B: Corypheus was deceived, turned into a monster, and wakes up to a world gone awry. Imagine yourself the anger and frustration YOU would feel if it happened. To top it off, consider the values you hold dear today. Consider them turned around. How would that make you feel?
Last part. MOTIVATION. Everyone is driven by it and Corypheus is no exception. His goals are clear, the writers on DA:I even spelled out his motivations for us as clear as they could:
Reach the golden city (as he was promised) take the power to become a god, and as a patriot to his home country - use that power to restore Tevinter to its former glory. This is why the mage quest line makes no sense!
"omg look guys, in teh future everything is dark and evil and red, Corypheus is such pure evil!" As we could see, this future vision of Thedas went against Corypheus's own plans just to showcase evil for the sake of giving the player an objectified and dehumanized villain. It was against his character imo.
Final nail in the coffin for me was when we had no dialogue to converse deeper with Corypheus at the end. Because lets face it, that guy would love to talk all day if our Inquisitor tried to. But why were we denied this? No alternate "talk him down" ending or at least the attempt? No deeper and branching dialogue with Corypheus on a more intellectual or philosophical level? No "I will join you!" attempts? No nothing? One line? Really? After 100+ hours?
I realized the truth about Corypheus as I finished the game. Bioware's Solas+Mythal questline was the next level, and Corypheus being butchered as a character post-haven was simply due to one thing; Corypheus was needed as a stepping stone for the continuation of the DA story. His work was done.
Corypheus had a fantastic backstory. Was great in DA2 and DA:I up to and including Haven. Then the personality contradictions started to happen as he was objectified, dehumanized and butchered. Sacrificed on the alter of narrative stepping stones.
Leliana at the end of the game (paraphrased): "We defeated pure evil". WOW! Leliana suddenly lost any credit as a character with empathy or wisdom.
Final words
Corypheus was a pious and powerful magister. Serving his country as a true patriot and enacting the will of his God. He was betrayed and woke up to a world gone wrong. Something which he tried to correct, with good intent. His god was silent so he himself sought to become one. In his final moments he cried out to Dumat in desperation but to no avail. David Gaider was done with this temporary tool that built the narrative stairs to the next part in the story. Sorry to sound dramatic but yeah.
Corypheus was ruined as a character in the latter half of the game, and Leliana calling Corypheus "pure evil" is a complete lack of wisdom or understanding over human nature. Whether this lack of wisdom stems from the writer or if it was intended for Leliana's character I do not know.





Retour en haut







