Aller au contenu

Jonah Ashland: The architect of humanity?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
12 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Guest_alleyd_*

Guest_alleyd_*
  • Guests

For me one of the most intriguing characters in ME was the tycoon Jonah Ashland. Reading the blurb in lore regarding Eldfell Ashland's corporate model and the rapid timeline of advancement suggest that this man was a Robber Baron capitalist of Galactic class. A man with the qualities that build empires through effectively exploiting resources, building monopolies and out competing his rivals in industry. I draw parrallels between Ashland and the Moguls/Tai Pans of the European Trading Empires of the English and Dutch East India Companies and the Robber Barons of the American Industrial golden age in the 19th and early 20th centuries (John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, J.P. Morgan and Cornelius Vanderbilt)

 

I believe that traders and merchants are the architects of Empires far more than military, scientific and political figures; especially in the scenario presented towards humans within the ME. We could not compete or establish much foothold in the galactic social political system of the MEU using military might, scientific advancement or political intrigue; the other council races were far more dominant  in these areas. Possibly the only area where humans could make avenues into the wider political system was economically and we had men like Ashland able to master the weaknesses that the other races economic systems had in the MEU.

 

Does anyone agree that Jonah Ashland was the architect of Humanity's position in the galaxy and that the unsung contributions of his company provided the basis for humans to be accepted in areas of politics etc?



#2
Fixers0

Fixers0
  • Members
  • 4 434 messages

Honestly, It's rather contrived that a Human corporation would play such a prominent role on the interstellar playground within a time spawn of just above twenty years. The other races have all been around for centuries if not more, back in ME1 humanity was peanuts, Even races like the Elcor and Hanar had bigger and more advanced economies than humanity. 


  • Vortex13 et KrrKs aiment ceci

#3
Dunmer of Redoran

Dunmer of Redoran
  • Members
  • 3 109 messages

Honestly, It's rather contrived that a Human corporation would play such a prominent role on the interstellar playground within a time spawn of just above twenty years. The other races have all been around for centuries if not more, back in ME1 humanity was peanuts, Even races like the Elcor and Hanar had bigger and more advanced economies than humanity. 

 

Human technological and economic development was pretty heavily skewed. Most of Earth in the Mass Effect series isn't really any better off than Earth is now. It makes sense for a handful of the wealthiest individuals (Jonah Ashland, Jack Harper, etc.) to be disproportionately influential.



#4
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 373 messages

Human Capitalism Go!



#5
KrrKs

KrrKs
  • Members
  • 863 messages

[...] It makes sense for a handful of the wealthiest individuals (Jonah Ashland, Jack Harper, etc.) to be disproportionately influential.

Influential within the Alliance, yes.

But that a large portion of the galactic/citadel fuel infrastructure belongs to a human corporation, when the other races have been using the exact same tech for thousands of years is more than a stretch.



#6
Dunmer of Redoran

Dunmer of Redoran
  • Members
  • 3 109 messages

Influential within the Alliance, yes.
But that a large portion of the galactic/citadel fuel infrastructure belongs to a human corporation, when the other races have been using the exact same tech for thousands of years is more than a stretch.

I find that aspect a little hard to believe, too. It probably would've been better if humanity belonged to the galactic community for another 20 or 30 years before the story took place.

#7
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

The entire rise of humanity from a backwater race to a major galactic power of its scale in less than 50 years without the military might of the Mongols in the 12th Century in comparison to the other galactic powers is quite ridiculous. Look at the galaxy map and see the Earth Alliance territory compared to the Asari, Turians, and Salarians. And of course humans save the council in the battle of the Citadel because the more advanced Turians, Salarians and Asari couldn't do it. Humans are Special!!! We're superior!!! And Shepard thought Asari needed other species to reproduce!

 

Ashland just happened to end up controlling most of the refuling depots in the galaxy, among other things. Who was his competitors? Bioware never bothered to write them because the story was human-centric. The Illusive Man was also printing TIM Credits during ME2 so he'd have enough to build his fleet. Didn't have to worry about paying his minions in ME3 either because they were modified and couldn't go home. "That could have been you, Shepard!"

 

Humanity could rise to become a galactic power using economics, but not in a 50 year time span. Even with the Battle of the Citadel. Even with Udina as Councilor.



#8
78stonewobble

78stonewobble
  • Members
  • 3 252 messages

Looking at the galaxy map, I personally think they overdid humanity's "geographical expansion", by quite a bit, but it doesn't seem implausible that a race new to the galactic community would go through a big development in the beginning, with the influx of new technology, culture, ideas and availability of ressources.

 

Whereafter development would plateau at more or less the galactics best, which evolves at a slower pace.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we have a comprehensive list of all the races planets. Possibly it doesn't take that much to catch up. The other races could be @ around this level: A couple of heavily populated planets with populations in the billions at most, lesser colony and ressource worlds with up to... at the very most... a couple of hundred million inhabitants.

 

If that's the case... There isn't THAT much catching up to do, if the new race is expansionist enough and as I said... that might be plausible right when a species enter the galactic scene.

 

Alternatively... The other races just simply are more slow to expand. Less cockroachy :D



#9
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 177 messages

I think for the most part most of the other species planets haven't been mentioned. 


  • KrrKs aime ceci

#10
Mister J

Mister J
  • Members
  • 241 messages

Well I remember Liara saying that within the galactic community humans were the ambitious and determined species that ran over everyone to reach their goals.



#11
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

I think the only way to justify the human expansion we see in ME is to explain that discovering the Mar's archives was a solely unique opportunity to reverse engineer Prothean technology and jumpstart humanities space efforts -- while everyone else had to do it the old fashion way.

 

Well I remember Liara saying that within the galactic community humans were the ambitious and determined species that ran over everyone to reach their goals.

 

The problem I have with this explanation for humans is that the individual characters we meet never seem particularly more or less aggressive/ambitious than other characters from other races.



#12
Mister J

Mister J
  • Members
  • 241 messages

I think mr. Man and Henry Lawson are prime examples of that and perhaps dr. Archer and Donovan Hock as well. Maybe no more than Saren but then I guess it's more about the overall picture than just the happenings of the game and the people Shepard runs into...



#13
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 598 messages

I think mr. Man and Henry Lawson are prime examples of that and perhaps dr. Archer and Donovan Hock as well. Maybe no more than Saren but then I guess it's more about the overall picture than just the happenings of the game and the people Shepard runs into...

Other races have had their equivalents in terms of do anything drives, the Dantius sisters being one example.

 

It's reasonable enough to think that humanity would undergo a pretty significant development spurt under the circumstances but not to come close to matching the clout of the turians, asari and so on in that timeframe, no matter the differences (which we don't really see any sign of).