Can we please stop right about now with this nonsense? It's insultingly ridiculous. Sure, the OP is laying it thick over here, I concur. Stubborn and all. Maybe he's justified. Probably is. But we're not to blame that Bioware wanted a quick money grab, nerfed a new gen game and tried to squeeze it into old gen consoles claiming that the experience would be almost identical, and no worries folks y'all get the same game with a few less NPCs walking around. What you people REALLY need to realize, and please do so now, in the real world, cause yeah in here it can get fuzzy after a while, we have ALL paid the EXACT SAME MONEY for a product that had been falsely advertised TO HALF THE BUYERS.
Nothing was falsely advertised. At all. If Bioware claims that the game is the same, but with less flavor NPCs and that is the case, then nothing was falsely advertised. The game being a buggy mess on old-gen systems doesn't invalidate or contradict the statement in ANY way. It's impossible for ANYONE to enforce technical equality between both generations, because the hardware used in both consoles is so radically different. "The experience would be almost identical" is likewise impossible to enforce because of those same limitations. On a clean run when the game works, it IS almost identical. All of the same choices, characters, outcomes, etc, are present. The story is the same, the combat is the same, etc. The game being a buggy mess doesn't invalidate this statement. If your copy of DAI turned out to be something entirely different, then you'd have a leg to stand on, but that's not the problem. The problem instead is that your game is buggy.
And, as we have said NUMEROUS TIMES ALREADY, a smashing 99% of us would have had no objection whatsoever being told that DAI can't run on our machines, fullstop. We would have been disappointed, but, as we do with other games and other companies that deem their games can't run on old gens, we would have waited till the future time when we can afford a new gen console and get the game for it then. So, INSTEAD of being sarcastic towards us players, and apologetic towards a company that seeks to GROSS A NET 2 BILLION DOLLARS IN 2015 FROM DLCS ALONE, maybe you should really put your brain at work, and think it through some more.
I don't know who this "we" is, but I'm fairly certain that "a smashing 99%" of them WOULD object to being told DAI can't run on your machines. Christ, look at the timed-exclusive DLC and the s***storm that started. Playstation and last-gen people have to wait however long before they can play Jaws of Hakkon, and they all collectively raise a stink about it instead of realizing that all they have to do is wait.
If Bioware had announced that DAI won't be available on old-gen systems, the biggest s***storm in the history of the BSN would have hit, and there would have been untold numbers of overgrown manchildren complaining about how "Bioware forgot about their fans who don't have new consoles". I know this, because it's happening NOW. They're damned if they do, damned if they don't. Funny how this people keep ignoring this.
And this is gonna be the last time I respond to shite like this, but really, it's ridiculous.
Oh, and as for the refunds etc, Bioware/EA plus employees were VERY CAREFUL to not address ANY of our issues with any disclaimer that we might be a smidgen justified before the legal refund window closed. That happened a couple of months ago. This is a company that knows how to play the legal game. We are just the cows getting milked. Well, at least we'd like to get milked and like it!!!
If this is your approach, then you deserve to be milked. You knowingly bought a game developed first-and-foremost for new technology, on a then 9-year-old console, well after the launch of the newest console generation. It's not Bioware's fault you still decided not to buy a PS4 or XB1 when both of those consoles have been out for more than a year up to DAI's release. That's like owning a Commodore or an Apple II computer and complaining that you can't run Windows 8 or Mac OS X. Or getting leaded gasoline for a car with an engine made to consume unleaded. Sure, it'll work, but not very well, and you'll get severe performance issues.
The provider is not the one responsible for the consumer making a poor choice with their money. You and the other people complaining have no moral or legal legs to stand on.
As an aside: I wish this site had down-voting to oppose the like system, because I'm curious to see how many I'll receive.