I don't think you are actually reading what I post at all XD You are taking stuff out of context and failing to comprehend my points, probaply intentionally.
I did not take anything out of context. I asked you to corroborate your claims, which you repeatedly failed to do. When I asked you to provide examples, you responded 'somewhere, not in this thread :)'. In the rest of this post, you talk about 'people' doing X while not doing Y, yet again, you fail to provide ANY sort of substantial support for your allegations, e.g.
Point was people being against scars on female warriors, but not on male warriors although both's job is fighting.
PROOF PLEASE! Polls if possible, a few quotes if not, anything to corroborate your claim that
- a substantial number of people
- want female scars removed
- while simultaneously not wanting male scars removed
- in general.
Because at the moment your argument really comes across as a fight against an imaginary position that you made up to make a statement about sexism, even more so because you fail to show how a statement about Cassie, an individual NPC, can be generalised to a statement about a whole population of female warriors.
I know that sociology is more... forgiving about providing proof but seriously, at this point you make it exceedingly difficult to debate with you because there are so many holes and logical flaws in your statements. If you want to continue this fight against an imaginary enemy, then go ahead, but unless you start actually bringing more substance to the table I'm losing interest. I don't enjoy intellectual shadowboxing.
EDIT/PS. A personal funny. Most of my heroines in SWTOR actually sport scars and look beautiful and kick-ass at the same time.