why Fiona ; Why?
#1
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 04:41
The stroy how she end up in a circle of magi . Her story with her son and how she become leader of the mage reblion
what i dont understand why she attaque heaven when you choose templar mission . We understand when the red templar attaque when you side with the mage cause the envy demon turned all the templar that u didnt save to red templar that have no will anymore .
But when you side with the templar . CURy use vanatory Ok but why not Alexuis the magister of the vanatory who attaque heaven after you don't came to his trap . They send fiona : why Fiona attaque as leader of the Vanatory ? It's stupid as mutch as stupid to leas the mages to be slaves to tivinter
#3
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 04:43
It's heavily implied she was brainwashed. There's (apparently) a codex entry that confirms this, but I've never seen it. If it is the case then I wish BW had made that clearer.
- DeathScepter aime ceci
#4
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 04:49
cause that the leadership is about . Everybody befor your self
#5
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 04:52
Oh, yeah, that reminds me. What ever happens to Alexius if you choose the Templars? I chose the Templars once, but after I made it to Skyhold, I ended my playthrough right there.
#6
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 04:55
Oh, yeah, that reminds me. What ever happens to Alexius if you choose the Templars? I chose the Templars once, but after I made it to Skyhold, I ended my playthrough right there.
Corypheus kills him since his time travel magic failed to remove the Herald of Andraste from being at the Temple of Sacred Ashes and ruining his plans.
- Fireheart aime ceci
#7
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 04:58
i choose the templar cause it give a betbetter presentation to Cole . DORIAN is already presented in the Chantry of red clif and it make sence when he cane to warn you . You know him and he was in touch not like a spirit that pop from noh where to warn you . The dream i truduce Cole the best what and i find ser baris a very good person and the futur of the templar order . If you side with the templar and allie with them they give you wartable mission that you send batis to it and he save a mage and stand with him against the population that wanted to exwcute him . He is the reflecion of what the templar order should be
#8
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 05:16
Yeah, fighting Alexius instead would have made more sense. Fiona appears to become a placeholder mini boss character and not as important as she SHOULD be considering her role in the universe (more apparent if you read the books). I mean, she appears as a fight so suddenly I wouldn't have even noticed her if someone else hadn't pointed it out to me. It's almost as bad as Jack becoming a banshee in ME3 if you don't help her.
Spoilers for the books:
You'd think that the only freaking person alive to have been cured of the Blight AND possibly the King's mother wouldn't be presented like this. She should have been sent to the Warden to help cure the Calling since that's apparently a big thing the Hero of Ferelden is searching for.
- Emerald Rift, DeathScepter et veeia aiment ceci
#10
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 05:53
She died in all of my playthroughs.
- Dark Helmet aime ceci
#11
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 05:54
I don't know about brainwash. But I'm sure bloodmagic was used to implant some thoughts into her
#12
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:03
It's heavily implied she was brainwashed. There's (apparently) a codex entry that confirms this, but I've never seen it. If it is the case then I wish BW had made that clearer.
There is no such codex, and it's not really that heavily implied at all.
This is a classic case of the stupid, which every BioWare character post '04 will experience at some point or another.
- TobiTobsen, TK514, GreenClover et 5 autres aiment ceci
#13
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:07
- myahele et congokong aiment ceci
#14
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:21
There is no such codex, and it's not really that heavily implied at all.
This is a classic case of the stupid, which every BioWare character post '04 will experience at some point or another.
Does everything always need to be laid out in front of you for you to see it? She seemed very confused in redcliffe when you were saying you met, and this never comes up again. It's incredibly suspicious, and not just of her but the writers.
This isn't the first time the devs have given subtlety to the story in inquisition, which I like about it a lot.
Well, subtle for Bioware anyway.
- DeathScepter, AlleluiaElizabeth et Suketchi aiment ceci
#15
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:23
Does everything always need to be laid out in front of you for you to see it? She seemed very confused in redcliffe when you were saying you met, and this never comes up again. It's incredibly suspicious, and not just of her but the writers.
This isn't the first time the devs have given subtlety to the story in inquisition, which I like about it a lot.
Well, subtle for Bioware anyway.
Didn't weekes support using the guide? Seems pretty clear cut in hat case.
Also, isn't the pro-circle Mage in the tavern he torturer in the bad future if you side wih the mages?
#16
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:25
I wish they'd made an effort to make you care about fighting Fiona/Knight Captain what's-his-name. They don't even do anything to make you notice that you're fighting anything special aside from them having a larger health bar.
- werqhorse, Han Shot First, Lord Bolton et 2 autres aiment ceci
#17
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:29
I assume Fiona attacked for the same reason all the other mages did. They were conscripted and feared death upon refusal. It's not unheard of. Krypplingz gives a pretty detailed explanation.
#18
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:29
Didn't weekes support using the guide? Seems pretty clear cut in hat case.
Also, isn't the pro-circle Mage in the tavern he torturer in the bad future if you side wih the mages?
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that last sentence, but as for the first, clear cut would be an official statement in my opinion. There's a number of things still up in the air that probably won't be clarified, but it doesn't mean things are as they seem. Think about it, how often in real conflict would you ever find out about every instance of trickery committed by the enemy even if you beat them?
It's "realistic" that they'd manipulate who they could and we wouldn't always know about it. The "stupid" card in this instance is just too stupid for me to believe. I'd feel stupid for thinking she was just that stupid. Since that's what the Tevinter would love you to think. That the mages of white thedas preferred their company to their circles. It'd be rather satisfying.
- Suketchi et MoonDrummer aiment ceci
#19
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:30
#20
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:31
I'm starting to wonder if he same hatred against Fiona and he mages attacking haven would still apply if he Templars weren't brainwashed and willingly attacked Haven
They willingly took the red stuff and followed Lucius, so...
Yeah.
#21
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 06:32
Lucky pro-Templars, you get to kill Fiona. As someone who sided with the mages, I wish I got to kill Fiona and pick a better leader for the mages.
- Lord Bolton, ComedicSociopathy et Eliastion aiment ceci
#22
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 07:26
- Razored1313 et Han Shot First aiment ceci
#23
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 07:34
see what we discovered now guys ? that the mages attaqued haven to save their selfs from Coryph and don"t face the same faith as Alexuis , Alexuis was doing it for his son , he have a motivation ,a selfish motvation the same as fiona to save her mages , she is not better than him
, fiona did the some crazy styuf to save the mages and her self , i think it was selfish , she is a bad leader for the mages , i realy think many mages would prerefer to die fighting Cory and being remembered as Mages who died with honor rather than deiging attaquing heaven .
As for the templar they will not attaque heaven if the red Lyrium wasn"t used on them , they wanted to help like sir baris say but Lord seeker was holding them in the castle , as a military force you have to obey your superior or you are considered as traitor . If the red lyrium wasn"t used on them , and was ordered to attaque heaven i realy think they woukd turn agaisnt lord seeker just like how they turn agaisnt him when they discovert that his a envy demon , and they fight with you in the main hall agaisn"t red templar , and i think the mage should have done the same against fiona when she went to the tiventer but they foilowed a stupid leader to the wrong route , and that why the templar was made right ? to face the mages that went in the wrong route of the purpose of magic
#24
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 08:09
You jump through hoops to defend her all you want, Bee. I assume you have excuses for all the other mages going along as well. Must be some serious mind control. Especially considering the fact they all suddenly forgot about it. Even when all outside influences are removed. It was magic that made them do it and then suddenly forget it forever. Her being mind control also isn't subtle. Neither is time travel.Does everything always need to be laid out in front of you for you to see it? She seemed very confused in redcliffe when you were saying you met, and this never comes up again. It's incredibly suspicious, and not just of her but the writers.
This isn't the first time the devs have given subtlety to the story in inquisition, which I like about it a lot.
Well, subtle for Bioware anyway.
- GreenClover, Dark Helmet et Amne YA aiment ceci
#25
Posté 06 avril 2015 - 08:13
You jump through hoops to defend her all you want, Bee. I assume you have excuses for all the other mages going along as well. Must be some serious mind control. Especially considering the fact they all suddenly forgot about it. Even when all outside influences are removed. It was magic that made them do it and then suddenly forget it forever. Her being mind control also isn't subtle. Neither is time travel.
that what i was traying to say in the last post , they screw it , most people that side with the mages are MAGES and that stop them from thinking about each moovement of the 2 camps , that why you shoud play some thing neutral first , to see from a neutral perspective , and not a class perspective





Retour en haut




