395 réponses à ce sujet

[Balkankerverkoper]

I want ME1 with the mechanics of ME3. I really love the game's story and atmosphere, but i can't get into it anymore due to the outdated gameplay.

[dlux]

ME3 is here to stay and bioware aren't going to leave it out of a remastered trilogy.

But, but a remastered trilogy wouldn't have have Mass Effect 3 in it. It would have Mass Effect, Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect: Not A Completely Crappy Epilogue Editon.

[Cameron Star]

I want ME1 with the mechanics of ME3. I really love the game's story and atmosphere, but i can't get into it anymore due to the outdated gameplay.

It would be nice if Bioware did it but I read somewhere that even though they know some fans have said they would like it, it's probably never going to happen. I've tried searching for where I read it but I can't, I think the reasons were some fans like it the way it is and wouldn't like it to be "retconned", and that it would also take a large amount of work anyways.

I'd like it as I agree it feels very outdated and, for me at least, it kind of seperates ME1 from the rest of the trilogy in a sense, different physics and all. If they did, and it is a big if, they'd either have to do the same for ME2, or just give ME1 the mechanics of ME2 instead of 3. I'd find it a bit weird starting the trilogy with ME3 physics, stepping backwards a little to ME2's, then back to ME3's again.

 

Again, I doubt very much they'd do it, but I agree it would be nice and help me, and hopefully others, enjoy ME1's story a lot more.

[Cameron Star]

But, but a remastered trilogy wouldn't have have Mass Effect 3 in it. It would have Mass Effect, Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect: Not A Completely Crappy Epilogue Editon.

Hey, the only thing "bad" about ME3 was the ending, which lasts no more than fifteen minutes. Disappointing, yes, but besides a few flaws here and there (which ME title doesn't have flaws?) the rest of the game is brilliant!

[dlux]

Hey, the only thing "bad" about ME3 was the ending, which lasts no more than fifteen minutes. Disappointing, yes, but besides a few flaws here and there (which ME title doesn't have flaws?) the rest of the game is brilliant!

Not in my opinion. ME3 felt rushed and was quite disappointing. I would have forgiven that if it would have at least had a spectacular ending... but yeah, we all know how that turned out.

[Golden_Persona]

Yeah, they'll just leave out ME3 from a trilogy remaster because of a 15 minute ending. Yeah... no. ME3 had some truly amazing set pieces, and the most emotional moments in the entire series. The gameplay was excellent, the leveling up was excellent and not riddled with boring passives like in ME1, weight system which offered more varieties for builds, lots of guns that have different effects and functions which makes it more RPGish, not less like people want to believe.

 

Literally the only bad things about ME3 was the final mission (everything up until finally killing Kai Leng which was the most satisfying feeling I had ever felt in a game, was amazing) and how linear the game was compared to ME1 and 2 (big shocker because of the Reapers). Not to mention a remaster would have the Citadel DLC, the best DLC in the whole series. If someone can't see the gem that was ME3 because of the ends then, to each his own, but don't be silly enough to think they'd leave it out, or re-name it something as silly as what you came up with. No reason for Bioware to feel ashamed of ME3. If anything I blame EA for not giving them the extra months that they wanted. With the time they had they did a great job.

 

I don't have as high of expectations when it comes to a remaster though. Just upgrade the graphics and make it 60 frames, plus all DLC including Pinnacle Station. If they are going to modify the games a bit how about making ME2 completely nonlinear again like they originally intended. The idea of being able to get every single party member at any time makes me salivate at the mouth. All the dialogue is still there. (They'd have to leave Legion out though for obvious reasons). Whatever they do they should not mess with ME1's gameplay save for touching up the inventory system. ME1 is a clunky mess, but it's a clunky mess with a lot of charm that I love. Nothing like shooting an enemy with a shotgun and watching them fly across the room.

[Heimdall]

As long as they include all DLC, I'd be down for it.

[Commander Rpg]

Hell no. Make new products instead.

[ChaosMutant3000]

I'd love to see ME1 with combat similar to ME2 or 3 and obviously improved graphics. Honestly I would just like some nit picky things, like having the default hair in ME3 being available for custom characters... and Xbox folks being able to have the casual hoodie in ME2 and ME3!! I honestly love the games the way they are and am very excited to see them updated/potentially made seamless. I'm playing through the trilogy again to see if there are any other things I might like to see. So far, I've only found that I literally cannot stop playing these games. 

 

Keep up the amazing work, Bioware! Cannot wait to see what ME4 is going to be like. Will be strange without Shepard and the gang, but I am ready to check out new facets of the ME universe. 

[Oldren Shepard]

I already save the money i'll need to buy a new console and the new game's story so if i have to save some more for that, that's not problem, is going to be a gift. so YES  please give us that.

[dlux]

ME3 had [...] the most emotional moments in the entire series.

That pilot dude crying about how his husband died or how the muscle dude in the hangar who talked about his life and other nonsense... Oh yeah, it was so emotional that I couldn't stop facepalming. 

 

Yeah, they'll just leave out ME3 from a trilogy remaster because of a 15 minute ending. Yeah... no. [...] don't be silly enough to think they'd leave it out, or re-name it something as silly as what you came up with.

It seems that your sarcasm detector is suffering from some serious damage. Better get it checked out.
 

Literally the only bad things about ME3 was the final mission (everything up until finally killing Kai Leng which was the most satisfying feeling I had ever felt in a game, was amazing) and how linear the game was compared to ME1 and 2 (big shocker because of the Reapers).
Not to mention a remaster would have the Citadel DLC, the best DLC in the whole series. If someone can't see the gem that was ME3 because of the ends then, to each his own

The entire game is rush job with mediocre writing. It isn't a gem and never will be, it is a completely forgettable game that should have never happened.

And Shadow Broker is by far the best DLC in the series, so you're wrong about that too.
 

No reason for Bioware to feel ashamed of ME3.

Nah. Bioware is severing all connections to the trilogy and starting completely anew in the Andromeda Galaxy so that they can leave the entire trilogy behind them (yes, I believe that the leak is legit). Doesn't sound like they are too proud of that horrible mess that is ME3. I can't blame them either.

[flaming]

As much as i doubt it, i'd love the offer!

[Drone223]

But, but a remastered trilogy wouldn't have have Mass Effect 3 in it. It would have Mass Effect, Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect: Not A Completely Crappy Epilogue Editon.

Bioware have made it clear they aren't changing ME3 anytime soon, what your asking for is not going to happen.

[Torgette]

Nah. Bioware is severing all connections to the trilogy and starting completely anew in the Andromeda Galaxy so that they can leave the entire trilogy behind them (yes, I believe that the leak is legit). Doesn't sound like they are too proud of that horrible mess that is ME3. I can't blame them either.

 

I think it's more about establishing a new story with a new studio than it is about them severing all ties to ME3's ending. Personally I didn't mind it and could think of quite a few good ways to make a direct sequel without offending anybody, but it's less about "is it possible??" or "is everything beyond repair??" and more "would it be feasible within normal development constraints?" and "if you have to finish a story, why not just let it finish now?".

[Golden_Persona]

That pilot dude crying about how his husband died or how the muscle dude in the hangar who talked about his life and other nonsense... Oh yeah, it was so emotional that I couldn't stop facepalming. 

 

It seems that your sarcasm detector is suffering from some serious damage. Better get it checked out.
 

The entire game is rush job with mediocre writing. It isn't a gem and never will be, it is a completely forgettable game that should have never happened.

And Shadow Broker is by far the best DLC in the series, so you're wrong about that too.
 

Nah. Bioware is severing all connections to the trilogy and starting completely anew in the Andromeda Galaxy so that they can leave the entire trilogy behind them (yes, I believe that the leak is legit). Doesn't sound like they are too proud of that horrible mess that is ME3. I can't blame them either.

 

1. Sure, pick out one small scene out of the dozens of big, character defining moments like Mordin's death, Grunt's "last" stand against the Rachni, Thane's deathbed scene, and all the scenes that can happen if you make drastic choices like choosing either Quarian's or Geth. *Claps*

 

2. Sarcasm or not, these kinds of people just looove to exaggerate about the quality of ME3 and say stupid things like that. That's what the rest of your post is in regards to ME3's quality so what's the point of debating? In no way is anything you said about ME3 correct from any kind of neutral standpoint. Time to let the endings go.

 

3. Opinions, but I would say Citadel wins out just from all the companion scenes during the second half of the DLC. That doesn't even say anything about the actual story in the Citadel DLC which has awesome throwbacks to ME2's suicide mission, has the only really good boss fight in the entire series, and brings back Wrex. Shadow Broker is a great DLC, but doesn't have nearly as much content. The drive through Illium is the only really special thing about the DLC. The Shadow Broker base is cool, but who ever really went there that often?

[CaericArcLight]

In general, I don't care for all the 'remastered' stuff coming out. If I get a new console, I'd like to play *new* games on it, not versions of things I've already done.

 

A remasted ME trilogy could easily change my mind. That would be a 'system seller' for me.

 

Semi-realistic wishes:

 

All DLC (yeah, Pinnacle Station, too).

Revised inventory system in ME1.

 

 

Probably-not-as-realistic wish:

 

Restore the some of the cut content that still lurks in the game files, and better yet, finish some of the things that got abandoned for whatever reason.

[Steppenwolf]

If they updated the experience and not just the graphics I would be all over it. Having ME1 and ME2 play like ME3 would be amazing. ME3 is a low point in terms of writing for BioWare, but the gameplay is fantastic. In comparison ME1 feels like a dud and ME2 feels a little boring.

 

Hey, the only thing "bad" about ME3 was the ending, which lasts no more than fifteen minutes. Disappointing, yes, but besides a few flaws here and there (which ME title doesn't have flaws?) the rest of the game is brilliant!

Strongly disagree.

[Arl Raylen]

#1 reason they won't do this:

 

DLC sales.

[Commander Rpg]

#1 reason they won't do this:

 

DLC sales.

[marcelo caldas]

If indeed ME4 is in another galaxy it's pointless to replay the games, specialy if there's no new content.

[SofaJockey]

#1 reason they won't do this:

DLC sales.

 

#1 reason they will do this:

Remastered trilogy sales.

 

If indeed ME4 is in another galaxy it's pointless to replay the games, specialy if there's no new content.

• The setting of ME:N is irrelevant. 
• New content is largely irrelevant. 

Because it's replay, not play for past players and glorious new play for folk who never bought it the first time.

 

Remasters tend to sell on DLC inclusion, upgraded look and the convenience of replay on new gen platforms.

That a ME:N is in the offing is a bonus.

 

If they drop in even the slightest expansion:

• Can you imagine an even slightly extended, extended cut with proper cutscenes that could not be done simply for space plus a little content that sets up the premise for ME:N?

License to print money... (including mine)

[dreamgazer]

#1 reason they won't do this:
 
DLC sales.

For the consoles that are on the cusp of becoming obsolete, three years after the release of the third game?

Just about everyone who wants the DLC now has it, especially after countless sales on the PSN and XBLA. Oodles of folks will fork over money to continue playing the games on new consoles, though.

[Steppenwolf]

#1 reason they won't do this:
 
DLC sales.

They're not making any money on Mass Effect DLC now. A remastered trilogy on the new consoles would make them a lot of money.

If indeed ME4 is in another galaxy it's pointless to replay the games, specialy if there's no new content.

That makes no sense. Did you only play the trilogy, with it's own self-contained story, because you thought it would all pay off somehow in the fourth game?

[dlux]

1. Sure, pick out one small scene out of the dozens of big, character defining moments like Mordin's death, Grunt's "last" stand against the Rachni, Thane's deathbed scene, and all the scenes that can happen if you make drastic choices like choosing either Quarian's or Geth. *Claps*

I still don't agree that ME3 had the most emotional moments in the series. Most scenes and dialogue felt forced and uninspired, which isn't surprising because the game was obviously rushed (we can thank EA for that I guess). 

 

Anyway, I felt more emotion simply by chatting with the characters and getting to know them in ME1 and ME2. I rolled my eyes and facepalmed countless times while playing ME3 because the game is full of so much awful dialogue and story telling.
 

2. Sarcasm or not, these kinds of people just looove to exaggerate about the quality of ME3 and say stupid things like that. That's what the rest of your post is in regards to ME3's quality so what's the point of debating? In no way is anything you said about ME3 correct from any kind of neutral standpoint. Time to let the endings go.

No way is anything you say about ME3 from a neutral standpoint correct either. See, I can play that game too. Anyway, I just threw a sarcastic one-liner (or two) and you then decided it would be a good idea to start a debate because you don't like my cynicism. ^^

 

I also don't think I am exaggerating. ME3 isn't a well designed Bioware game, it is a rushed and lackluster EAWare game.
 

3. Opinions, but I would say Citadel wins out just from all the companion scenes during the second half of the DLC. That doesn't even say anything about the actual story in the Citadel DLC which has awesome throwbacks to ME2's suicide mission, has the only really good boss fight in the entire series, and brings back Wrex. Shadow Broker is a great DLC, but doesn't have nearly as much content. The drive through Illium is the only really special thing about the DLC. The Shadow Broker base is cool, but who ever really went there that often?

The Citadel DLC is actually quite good and pretty enjoyable, but I still think that Lair of the Shadow Broker is the best DLC in the series. Like you wrote, opinions.