Speaking as a 25 year old Army Officer and veteran who has NCO assistants nearly twice my age answering to me, I can tell you your point is way off. Like completely way off. I'm half-convinced this is a troll thread.
I do a good job. My NCO's acknowledge that. They support me a hundred percent, and I pay out their support by pulling through and getting the mission accomplished with my team. We have our disagreements and clashes, but at the end of the day, I'm one hundred percent confident in their abilities, and they are most certainly one hundred percent confident in my own.
I know plenty of officers with NCO's twice their age who are able to be an effective command presence and team.
Also, I really don't think you understand biological processes of aging. You're literally looking at the view with the same kind of scientific perspective as a young-earth Creationist.
A 90 year old in Mass Effect is not '50 years old physically'. Where the hell are you pulling that out of? Boot polished corn-holes where the sun don't shine? Most likely.
Your point is invalid on the basis of you showing complete ignorance of senescence in biological organisms, even in the medically advanced future. You're living a longer, healthier life, but that by no means equals you living with the body of a 50 year old at 90 years old. Biology simply does not work that way.
Cute, I just so happen to be Barack Obama. Clap yourself on the shoulder and consider it an order from your President. I've never cared to find out exactly what a troll thread is supposed to be, so I can't help you on that one.
I assumed that the current specific biological process would be close to irrelevant, seeing as few who live under close to ideal circumstances today make it past ninety-five and the absolute average human in ME can magically expect to live to one hundred and fifty. That that just means that practically infirm seniors(based on Hackett's appearance at 51) in ME are kept alive for an extra fifty years didn't really occur to me, so I thought that the aging process itself was slowed at some point after thirty(based on Shepard's appearance at 29).
In hindsight I arrived at the ninety years by some very, very crude calculations that entirely failed to take into consideration that Shepard isn't actually a teenager at 29, but my basic point was indeed that a much longer lifespan equating a much longer prime would mean that twenty-nine year old Shepard should have been considered very, very young for the ridiculous responsibility given to him by people much, much more experienced than he is, especially because he is a Spectre candidate before anyone even realizes that there's a crisis going on needing his specific attention.
In the absence of the huge elderly problem we never hear about in-game, that seemed more or less sound. I was wrong, shoot me.
That was a joke.
No, I can't read.
I just don't see people over 50-60 - or even many over 40 - wanting to be in the military. They've done their bit and moved on, now it's time to see what else is out there. Less of life being stretched out over twice the length of time and more of life giving you twice the number of opportunities.
And soldiers do not have the liberty of choosing which orders to obey whether you like that or not. My granddad was a C.O. in his mid-twenties, commanding people older than himself. He wasn't even the youngest person at his rank. It's about who's best for the job, not how old they are.
Okay, sorry, that was a stupid thing to write. I was just irritated that you read something that wasn't there.
Good point, I didn't consider that. With Hackett looking the way he does at just fifty-one, though...
I never said anything about people refusing to follow Shepard's orders on account of his age, I was speaking in terms of him being specifically chosen for so much responsibility even though he would have been practically unproven in the field.
Should see his threads on the DA board
Go for it. Show us what threads it is you mean. I have absolutely no idea.
If that is how you want to measure someones age and maturity then none of the races other than the Krogan or Asari should be wielding any kind of power. Being 150 years old to us means we're old and on our final days, to Asari it means they're ready to leave the house. Lol.
Trolling aside I do wonder what the age equivalent is in Mass Effect's universe in relation to today's eldery. I mean I know that just because humans live to be 150 that a 80 year old isn't going to be jumping around like a spry teenager... but it stands to reason that they would be significantly more healthy and able-bodied than a 80 year old of today. I mean, if 80 in ME is the exact same as 80 today what is even the point of wanting to live to 150. It seems like it'd only get progressively worse. Think of poor Miranda then who apparently going to live even longer than that.
So I would expect that us living to 150 is indicative of humans being able to stay in decent, healthy shape for longer than we can today. That we can go slightly longer before the effects of age really begin to impede on our lives.
In terms of life-expectancy Mass Effect's middle-aged, for example, should be around 70 years old. We see Zaeed who we assume is a fairly 'old' vet merc yet he has no problem keeping up with Shepard and squad. Anderson is 50 years old ingame, from what I remember, and claims he's too old to be running around the galaxy yet seems to be perfectly able to survive and hold off reaper forces for months on end. I got the assumption that his age-weariness was more mental than anything physical - all in all he seemed to be in good shape.
Well, Hackett looks to be in his middle to late sixties, albeit fit, at 51 years, so now I really don't know what to think.