^I heard they were also sent to work in fairly terrible places. Even if they had the means to not work there.
Equality event but no white people or males are allowed...
#26
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:03
#27
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:04
"And we are done here."
#28
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:06
The Irish are Celtic, and have often been on the short end of the stick historically. Consider, for example, the treatment of Irish immigrants to the United States, where businesses would often refuse to hire them.
They;re still white though, which is what makes this whole thing incredibly stupid.
Skin color doesn't mean anything on its own, the history does. The irish have gotten their teeth knocked out by everyone throughout the years, but cause of their skin color they're more privileged then most? A pakistani can be an incredibly violent bigot towards indians, and an indian man can be a massive religious bigot towards people of islamic faiths, but cause they're both brown they can't be discriminatory? Cause discrimination is power plus privilage(color of skin/gender)?
It's racist lunacy, repackaged from the 1950's and brought to the 21st centruty to make everyone thinks its good again. Like everything else a lot of hipsters do, they just took something from the past (racial prejudice) and repackaged it to make it the in thing to do. ![]()
- AventuroLegendary, X Equestris, SnakeCode et 2 autres aiment ceci
#29
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:12
I'm surprised they didn't ban "privileged straight scum" and "the elite xtian scum of society" while they were at it from attending their "equality" meeting.
#30
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:12
Good for them. No ones need white people or men. said no Dobby ever.
#31
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:13
Degenerate social justice filth, the level of bile I have for them is beyond compare.
Also the Irish were better off under English rule, so are the Scots and the Welsh, back in the day when men were men and the government wasn't replete with spineless liberal sycophants.
- DeathScepter aime ceci
#32
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:14
Good for them. No ones need white people or men. said no Dobby ever.
#33
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:16
To be fair, not all liberals are bad. It's a good idea, that these idiots are completely butchering.
Really, there are liberals, and then there are 'liberals' who believe its hip to be liberal.
#34
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:16
Degenerate social justice filth, the level of bile I have for them is beyond compare.
Also the Irish were better off under English rule, so are the Scots and the Welsh, back in the day when men were men and the government wasn't replete with spineless liberal sycophants.
Drink to the Empire!
#35
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:17
The more ugly part of my psyche wonders where the world would be without us.
There would be a lot less sunscreen and porn (white people and men, respectively).
- God aime ceci
#36
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:17
Drink to the Empire!
#37
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:18
The more ugly part of my psyche wonders where the world would be without us.
I imagine women would buy a lot more batteries as a whole without men.
#38
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:18
Drink to the Empire!

#39
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:19
They;re still white though, which is what makes this whole thing incredibly stupid.
Skin color doesn't mean anything on its own, the history does. The irish have gotten their teeth knocked out by everyone throughout the years, but cause of their skin color they're more privileged then most? A pakistani can be an incredibly violent bigot towards indians, and an indian man can be a massive religious bigot towards people of islamic faiths, but cause they're both brown they can't be discriminatory? Cause discrimination is power plus privilage(color of skin/gender)?
It's racist lunacy, repackaged from the 1950's and brought to the 21st centruty to make everyone thinks its good again. Like everything else a lot of hipsters do, they just took something from the past (racial prejudice) and repackaged it to make it the in thing to do.
There was even a time where Irish, and Italians, weren't considered white.
But I completely agree with you. The notion that some people seem to have that only white people can be bigoted, or only men can be sexist, is complete and utter bull.
- SnakeCode aime ceci
#40
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:20
There would be a lot less sunscreen and porn (white people and men, respectively).
Indeed!
White people man... we're the boon and bane of humanity.
#41
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:21
I imagine women would buy a lot more batteries as a whole without men.
Hehe.
#42
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:23
One thing I would like just as much for white males to be acknowledged as potentially understanding and empathetic is for females to be allowed to be skeptical, passive, critical and otherwise stereotypically "white males."
#43
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:25
Spoiler
I can't live without men.
#44
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:25
One thing I would like just as much for white males to be acknowledged as potentially understanding and empathetic is for females to be allowed to be skeptical, annoying, passive aggressive, and otherwise stereotypically "white males."
They can and are allowed to be.
it's just that if they're guys they get called a-holes. and if they're gals they get called b-word.
But then one side demanded no one should be allowed to call them anything but "excellent", which is why we're in this boat now.
#45
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:28
Indeed!
White people man... we're the boon and bane of humanity.
Spoiler
No that's humans for you. It's got nothing to do with skin colour.
Or let's ignore that the Chinese have down all the same right? Fighting wars...going to space...enslaving...building great technology etc etc etc...
#46
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:31
They can and are allowed to be.
it's just that if they're guys they get called a-holes. and if they're gals they get called b-word.
But then one side demanded no one should be allowed to call them anything but "excellent", which is why we're in this boat now.
They can and are allowed to be, lots of people don't really like it though IMO, they expect females to fit a specific category of the kind of bulwark of morality or grounded sense, outspoken and such to counter-act their own passivity etc.
I don't think they like it when females are just as passive, critical, or as evasive as they are personality wise.
#47
Posté 23 avril 2015 - 09:31
And we are done here.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






