Time to put myself on the firing line...
When almost every single hairstyle (including ones meant to be "feminine") have sideburns and/or male-pattern-baldness I'm just not sure how else to take it...
That is defaulting to male. What would have been infinitely better is if they defaulted to nothing - No baldness, and sideburns being an option in the facial hair section. That establishes neutrality which is absolutely essential if they want every style available for both genders.
Not to mention the fact that not every male has male-pattern-baldness ever, especially since most Inquisitors aren't very old, and that they don't all want to have sideburns either, another reason to put them in the facial hair section where they belong. In other words, this is bad for male and female characters, and while I'm all for everyone being able to choose any hairstyle, they went about it in the complete wrong way.
The other comments are pretty stupid though. *Braces for impact*
You haven't been a raving troll about it though. Plus, you haven't accused the design team of misogyny, or treating women as inferior. You feel the same way I do: Regardless of gender, the hair sucks. I don't think the company meant to come off that way, I think it was a matter of priorities. They felt that most of the default hairstyles would be fine for everyone if they plopped longer hair on it. I don't think any gender is being singled out though. The engine hasn't had a lot of female characters put on it in the past, and for whatever reason, the devs found the hair less important than making sure we have a dozen beds for sale for our bedroom we never spend time in. Ahem, sorry about that. That's what I'm getting at. You're not saying that BioWare set out to make women feel inferior, you're saying that they didn't put a lot of thought in to the hairstyles for either gender. That I can get behind.
Besides, I really make it a point to try not to flame someone over a polite disagreement of opinion. I've had no problem with you before, and you expressing your opinion doesn't change that. ![]()
So even Allan doesn't participate on these forums anymore? They (the forums) must have gotten very bad (vitriolic, disrespectful, uncivilized etc...) if that's the case.
Last I heard he got moved to another project. He's a Q&A guy, so he moves around BW projects as needed. He's either getting ready to help with the new IP or they've moved him onto the next ME game. I've seen him on twitter and whatever he's doing, it's taking up most of his time. Talk of coding and stuff like that. He's popped up a few times recently in the forums.
Speaking of the quiet from a BioWare rep, I decided to do some research tonight. I looked up what the responbilities of a community manager were and let's say what I found was troubling in regards to the BSN. These are the sites I used for my research, in case anyone was curious.
http://www.socialfre...ob-description/
http://sproutsocial....munity-manager/
http://thecommunitym...manager-is-not/
All three of those links were enlightening, but one of them succinctly sums the job description up.
Communication, moderation, guideline writing, engaging day to day online (forums, owned communities, blogs, newsletters) and offline (events, conferences, meetups), strategy, working with the social teams/marketing/support/product/PR/management, surveying, customer service, and a variety of other activities.
With regards to the forums and David Hulegaard...
Communication: He doesn't have many posts.
Moderation: Many posters don't even know he's around. Or even what his name is.
Guideline Writing: It's rare, but most of that comes from Conal Pierce or one of the other devs.
Day to Day Online: Not enough laughing gifs on the internet to cover this one.
I don't know how much of the offline events, social team and surveying stuff he does, so I won't judge there. I also know that EA has it's own customer service. However, the forum community manager has been offline for over 2 months. May I ask...what in blazes is going on?





Retour en haut







