Aller au contenu

Photo

Should there be confirmation of a Maker in the next game?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
29 réponses à ce sujet

#1
animedreamer

animedreamer
  • Members
  • 3 060 messages

Do you think at any point in any future Dragon Age game, that the players not necessarily the characters in game in should be made aware of some supreme overseer like the Maker?



#2
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages
Bioware has said since DAO that it will never happen.

#3
Jaison1986

Jaison1986
  • Members
  • 3 319 messages

The best you can expect is that they disprove Andraste. If they show that she was an mere mortal and that no god aided her, that is pretty much confirming that there is no maker.



#4
Sir Froggie

Sir Froggie
  • Members
  • 459 messages

I honestly dislike that they are confirming that other gods are real. If they confirmed the Maker I would probably just kill it on principle.


  • Taki17 et mat_mark aiment ceci

#5
Jaison1986

Jaison1986
  • Members
  • 3 319 messages

I honestly dislike that they are confirming that other gods are real. If they confirmed the Maker I would probably just kill it on principle.

 

Well, they are proving these gods are real, but also proving they are far from divinity.



#6
Qun00

Qun00
  • Members
  • 4 440 messages
There should be at least confirmation on how their world came into existence.

#7
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

I honestly dislike that they are confirming that other gods are real. If they confirmed the Maker I would probably just kill it on principle.

 

And then you would get one hit KO :P



#8
trevelyan_shep

trevelyan_shep
  • Members
  • 375 messages
I think they should come up with a group of people who are completely against the Maker/gods in general. It would be interesting.

#9
X Equestris

X Equestris
  • Members
  • 2 521 messages
It's never going to happen. And I don't think it should. Some mysteries should remain...mysterious.
  • phaonica, Hellion Rex, mat_mark et 3 autres aiment ceci

#10
Ashagar

Ashagar
  • Members
  • 1 765 messages

The best you can expect is that they disprove Andraste. If they show that she was an mere mortal and that no god aided her, that is pretty much confirming that there is no maker.

 

why? Given that the Maker was a ancient Northern Neromenian/Tevinter Creator Deity who was believed to exist by the Tevinter long before Andreste was ever born or the Tevinter started worshiping the old gods for that matter I find it hard to believe the revelation that he didn't help andreste proving anything about him other than the Tevinter being right about one of their gods not helping the upstart barbarian rebel slave.



#11
Nehn

Nehn
  • Members
  • 289 messages

There's no need for confirmation. You either believe there's a Maker or not.

I feel the players can make the choice for themselves. It's better than being told. 


  • Cobwebmaster, Jedi Master of Orion, Hellion Rex et 4 autres aiment ceci

#12
Sir Froggie

Sir Froggie
  • Members
  • 459 messages

There's no need for confirmation. You either believe there's a Maker or not.

I feel the players can make the choice for themselves. It's better than being told. 

Yes, I simply preferred when this seemed to apply to the other major religions. The fact that we have proof that these entities are real, if not necessarily what we originally thought, undercuts the faith aspect for me.



#13
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages
Well the Maker if he exists is literally the creator God of everything and everyone.

That's a belief of Faith.

#14
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Yes, but it should only happen by way of nug. So, essentially, a giant horde of nugs lines up on top of each other, spelling out "The Maker is Real". 



#15
mat_mark

mat_mark
  • Members
  • 117 messages



#16
Urazz

Urazz
  • Members
  • 2 445 messages

I honestly dislike that they are confirming that other gods are real. If they confirmed the Maker I would probably just kill it on principle.

Yeah but they are proving that they never made the world or the various people of it. Just that they existed and were worshipped by the people in it.  It essentially proved that they are more demi-gods than actual gods.  Even in Dragon Age: Inquisition you aren't ever shown that the Maker doesn't exist, just that you were blessed by Andraste with the Mark.


  • Freedheart aime ceci

#17
Digger1967

Digger1967
  • Members
  • 294 messages

Do you think at any point in any future Dragon Age game, that the players not necessarily the characters in game in should be made aware of some supreme overseer like the Maker?

 

Not sure why it would be needed.  Me personally I think Sera has the best take on this when you talk to her at Skyhold, when she talks about how Cory cracked the Golden City and found the seat of the Maker.  Well if the story is true that means the seat of the Maker is a real thing.  A seat needs a butt, so the Maker, real thing.



#18
Char

Char
  • Members
  • 2 037 messages

Not sure why it would be needed.  Me personally I think Sera has the best take on this when you talk to her at Skyhold, when she talks about how Cory cracked the Golden City and found the seat of the Maker.  Well if the story is true that means the seat of the Maker is a real thing.  A seat needs a butt, so the Maker, real thing.


He found a seat.
It doesn't have to belong to the Almighty :)

Either way I hope Bioware doesn't make it official either way. That way the religiously inclined, and the atheists like myself, can each assume they are right.
  • mat_mark et Digger1967 aiment ceci

#19
Digger1967

Digger1967
  • Members
  • 294 messages

He found a seat.
It doesn't have to belong to the Almighty :)

Either way I hope Bioware doesn't make it official either way. That way the religiously inclined, and the atheists like myself, can each assume they are right.

 

Well the story says he found a seat.  Truth is the story might be completely wrong, for all we know he could just be crazy as a poop house rat.  :)  But like you I'd rather not have an official statement one way or the other.  I think it's far better to leave that up to the character to decide.  I've played both ways myself, characters that do believe and characters that don't.  I've enjoyed both.


  • Freedheart aime ceci

#20
Andres Hendrix

Andres Hendrix
  • Members
  • 1 424 messages

Bioware has stated that they will never confirm it. I would not mind it happening, as long as the Maker is killable (like Gods in the Forgotten Realms).



#21
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

I think they should leave the mystery of how the world was created a mystery. How would Bioware even go about confirming that the Maker exists and is in fact a god? Whatever form the Maker takes, players will argue his/her godhood, so why bother "revealing" it?



#22
The Baconer

The Baconer
  • Members
  • 5 681 messages

No PC can handle the Eldritch Truth



#23
General TSAR

General TSAR
  • Members
  • 4 385 messages

Ambiguity is best suited to the Maker. 


  • Hellion Rex et GreyLycanTrope aiment ceci

#24
Hellion Rex

Hellion Rex
  • Members
  • 30 037 messages

Nah, keep it mysterious. Keep us guessing and wondering.



#25
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 293 messages

Yes, I desire to feast upon the tears of those who would not take it well