NO I won't revive it but will read it.

NO I won't revive it but will read it.

Aaaaww I feel sorry for the Master Chief. He won't know the joy of boners or boning people.
That's kind of disturbing
Well, those are definitely fake... ![]()
any way taught i'd share this,
Guest_TrillClinton_*
any way taught i'd share this,
I'm so happy he became mainstream.
A turing machine.

You missed the best part. They pushed him into the background and refused to acknowledge his work then drove him to suicide because they didn't like his sexual orientation.
Dude i didn't make it i just Googled his name.

Yeah well it was the 1950s the era of no choice.. Our way or the highway and I swear some of the baby boomer generation want us to go back that way. Look at the nutjobs in the GOP and Republicans.. And this cancer is spreading beyond the USA
This thread is about AI not politics
This thread is about AI not politics
You'll notice people often go off topic in most topics, even in serious ones, and nobody gives a damn, with few exceptions.
mod 3 gives a damnYou'll notice people often go off topic in most topics, even in serious ones, and nobody gives a damn, with few exceptions.
This thread is about AI not politics
My post was a comment on how they treated Alan Turing therefore it is valid
"Credit cards use indeed theorems that make them, at the state of our knowledge of mathematics, unassailable by computers, but there is a peculiarity of human reason that combines the latest technology with the most atavistic qualities of intuition and dexterity: this art can always beat any machine's inability to which it is prisoner. "Give me a definition of intelligence and I will show you that computers can be smart", advocated too optimistically the british Alan Turing. Well, is it not the intuition the one component among the most important, if not the first, of human intelligence? and the algorithm is not an alternative to intuition, the definition of fundamental computer science that Alan has given in his memorable script in 1936? Remember, Dustin Hoffman's Rain Man? The character shows better than any disquisition that autism, even when doing wonders in the calculation, is not the same as intelligence. This distinction is why no adept of AI knows (even vaguely imagine how) to write a program that shows for example, the commutative property of multiplication, without using the fifth axiom of Peano."
"Credit cards use indeed theorems that make them, at the state of our knowledge of mathematics, unassailable by computers, but there is a peculiarity of human reason that combines the latest technology with the most atavistic qualities of intuition and dexterity: this art can always beat any machine's inability to which it is prisoner. "Give me a definition of intelligence and I will show you that computers can be smart", advocated too optimistically the british Alan Turing. Well, is it not the intuition the one component among the most important, if not the first, of human intelligence? and the algorithm is not an alternative to intuition, the definition of fundamental computer science that Alan has given in his memorable script in 1936? Remember, Dustin Hoffman's Rain Man? The character shows better than any disquisition that autism, even when doing wonders in the calculation, is not the same as intelligence. This distinction is why no adept of AI knows (even vaguely imagine how) to write a program that shows for example, the commutative property of multiplication, without using the fifth axiom of Peano."

Your loss!