If you don't want to try thinking, or making up your mind, I understand. It's taxing. takes up calories to decide.
Huh? I've been clued onto most of what's going on and had my mind made up since Gamers were declared dead on Gamasutra. I make most of the GG threads on BSN to begin with. But what I'm saying is that for someone who hasn't seen it happen first hand, 8-9 months of happenings is a lot to get through. It's easy to say google it, but with the level of sheer misinformation going on with this topic, a succinct and accurate summary is the best starting point.
Considering that Wikipedia's trash article is likely the first result, it's for the best that someone who only has a cursory interest in the issue doesn't get involved unless they're willing to go through it properly. And I don't blame people for not caring especially when they weren't around to see the Fire Rising. I did suggest the KYM article as a better starting point though.
"It's actually about ethics in game journalism"
This annoyed me.
After the Gamers Are Dead articles dropped, the hashtag was used as a means of distancing themselves from Zoe Quinn and acknowledging that her impropriety was not central to what the consumer revolt was about. #BurgersAndFries was the ZQ-centric hashtag. That's why "changing the hashtag and focusing on 'ethics' instead" suggestions don't work.
It's already been done.When it was revealed that game journos would collude on media narratives via secret mailing groups, when journos covered up stories about EA forums being hacked because of personal relationships, when companies like Polytron were implicated in money laundering schemes, when personal friendships and relationships for favourable coverage were exposed (both in the indies and AAA), or the hypocritical way the games media approached sexual scandals for men and women, or how journos are breaking guidelines and selling their publisher bought swag for hundreds (or thousands) of bucks, or how certain devs were subscribing/paying journo's patreons and receiving positive press, etc etc etc.
When all of that came to light, people waved it away as "muh ethics" because it was only the tip of the iceberg of an unimportant industry. "It's just games". A journo here, a journo there. A publisher here with one or two problems. Sweeping it all under the rug and instead running wall to wall coverage of 3 women and how they are the victim of GG. The reason corruption isn't talked about more is because whenever corruption in the media is found, the media and their SJW readership handwaves it away and talks endlessly about women being harassed by a sexist hashtag. There's no digging, no further investigation because GG is an outside group and unable to find more information. Can't even open a stall at conventions if you're openly GG these days apparently. Even big scalps like the Shadow of Mordor controversy are used as ammunition
against GG, even though it was a pro-GG streamer who brought the matter to the public's attention.
We hear so many stories about reviews being bought, paid and influenced by big companies. But those affect the livelihood of those in the games media and so we're given tripe about the poor victims. The larger news organisations don't give a crap. Gaming has always been an easy hobby to beat up on, and it segues nicely into the women in tech angle. There's emails from Canada's CBC and Australia's ABC that tell people outright that they ignore the "ethics" angle because it conflicts with the "sexism" story they want to push. You would think after the "Mass Effect is a sex simulator" crap, people would be more savvy and skeptical of mainstream news outlets covering gaming. But we're not.
Gives me the shits that GG is not disciplined enough to stick to digging and rooting out corruption, especially on the AAA level. Even for a guy that hates SJWs like myself, there is far too much firing potshots at SJWs. But GG is anything but disciplined, it's a hashtag of anti-censorship egalitarian shitposters who have been slandered and lied about for months on end. Which is, funnily enough, one of the reasons it's managed to stay alive so long.
Doesn't really matter though. At this point, the conflict is already over. GG has already won. The worst of the media hitpieces did nothing to break it, publications have pledged reforms and it will continue on as a loose confederation of anti-SJW consumer watchdogs. Was fun while it lasted though.