I wouldn't conclude anything based upon "information" from any kind of bullshitology. Nor would I use bullogic for the process.
Wait, so we are assuming that an extraterrestrial craft was destroyed in the airspace near Roswell, but I am to discount any of the reports that would support that it would infact be an extraterrestrial craft?
What?
Wait, so we are assuming that an extraterrestrial craft was destroyed in the airspace near Roswell, but I am to discount any of the reports that would support that it would infact be an extraterrestrial craft?
What?
what if the alien pilots gotten drunk one night and crash? i am not discounting that
Wait, so we are assuming that an extraterrestrial craft was destroyed in the airspace near Roswell, but I am to discount any of the reports that would support that it would infact be an extraterrestrial craft?
What?
Are we assuming that an extraterrestrial craft was destroyed in the airspace near Roswell?
If then, why?
If one should discount any report, or not, tends to be in the report itself, and in the history of the report.
...And why does it "support" that it would be an extraterrestrial craft?
Retour en haut