OK so as I played the game, it wasn't long before I noticed little things that didn't seem to quite add up with how lore was seemingly supposed to be.
Some were obvious. I'm pretty sure I remember The Masked Empire very clearly establishing that Celene and Gaspard are only distant cousins. Yet in the Winter Palace they clearly are said to be first cousins. That might not sound like a big change but it kind of paints the entire book a little differently. The last chance for peace before the civil war was Gaspard proposing to Celene on a hunt together. Celene considers it because it would have been politically expedient and notes that the fact that they were distant cousins means little. Not only does this mean Gaspard's formerly reasonable offer to Celene is now an offer of marriage to his own first cousin, but it couldn't have been practical because of the fact that being the lover of one's cousin is considered a scandal for an Emperor of Orlais.
Then there's little things in the codex entries and weapon descriptions that don't seem to make sense. I remember before the game came out, the question of whether the elves sacked Val Royeaux was often brought up because it was mentioned in the old timeline but when World of Thedas came out they seemed to quietly omit that one detail. I figured Mother Giselle settled the issue when she mentioned that the elves were not victims because they had taken Montsimmard but still does not say they did more than threaten Val Royeaux. But then there's a weapon or something that was said to be used by elves in the Sack of Val Royeaux. So which is it?
There's another axe or hammer or something that I think was said to be used in fighting relieving a siege in the Anderfels in the Third Blight... which was the ONE Blight that spared the Anderfels.
There's one strange codex entry by Petrine (so written in fairly recent times) that said the last blight was in the Towers Age, seemingly forgetting about Fourth Blight altogether.
And there is STILL that inexplicable codex entry from DAO about the Imperial Chantry that has a comment about Tevinter not restoring a magocracy until the Storm Age which doesn't fit with what we know of the timeline AND says it's by a member of the White Chantry despite being sourced from a revered father from a Tevinter city.
What's the deal here?





Retour en haut







