Boy, this is such a bizarre thread.... reasonable speculations and crackpot theories going toe-to-toe. Logic and madness, tied together in eternal battle, fighting for dominance - who shall win!? *cue dramatic music*
Anyway... back to Sera! (somewhat)
How can we firmly stand on the principal of truth of anything on a cannon that can be changed by the stroke of Bioware's pen?
While many details are prone to change, I think it's been confirmed by at least a few Bioware writers that they already know where this ship is sailing. I myself read that in an interview with Gaider, who reveals that most things - at least when it comes to major events and plot twists - have been planned since DAO.
And it's only logical. With a story this big (and containing many variables!), it would be madness to leave everything to chance or whim of either writers or fans.
They certainly went to extremes to dangle IDEAS.
And many fans, including myself, went...oh...shiny (no Sera reference intended (um this statement gives away too much geekdom)).
Old god vs Elvan gods...Bioware led us to connect the dots. Is it true? Who knows what they are writing as of this second. All things considered though, the thought is dangled before us.
Well, if I learned anything from Bioware is that they like to subvert expectations and introduce red herrings.
It's cool, because for those who don't take the story at face-value it keeps things fresh and intriguing (and introduces a game of who's smarter: writers or the audience?), but it also introduces the danger of... well... what we sometimes see here: sprawling theories held together by a piece of string and used chewing gum.
Connecting the dots is all fine and cool, but it doesn't mean that it can be done indiscriminately.
Solas is not happy about the idea of the old gods being slain. The reasons could go on for pages. In reality, Bioware put a great deal into DA:I for fans to go, huh(?) so are Elvan gods and old gods the same.
Conclusive pruff. No implied repeatedly. Yep.
Um, no, it's not implied repeatedly. At best we can establish that there's SOME sort of connection, but we cannot say for sure what exactly that connection is... Were Old Gods elven gods once? Were they Forbidden Ones? Are they just elven gods' pet dragons? Or are they something older, that regained its voice after the fall of elven gods? Maybe they're just similar? Or maybe they imitate them, just like Corypheus tried to imitate Old Gods?
There are too many questions that yet remain unanswered.
Is Sera an old God? Proof? No. Implied...well it's definitely implied there's some strange stuff going on with her and the Fade, she definitely has a connection well beyond any regular city elf...that is spelled out...repeatedly, and all over the place, especially with party banter with Cole and Solas. Bioware writers wrote that specific dialogue, it's not like the actors were improving it. If we are fans and into the lore, the more they subtly shove it in your face, the more you are asked to think about it, or you can ignore the puzzle and wait for the next game.
The only thing I see implied is that Sera is special, because elves are special... And I'm pretty sure it's obvious for most people now, seeing how much of the story revolves around glorious elven past, as well as the Fade to which elves have special connection to.
So, Sera is unique only in a sense that she's been raised predominantly around humans - therefore many things she thinks are weird (like, say, deja-vu) are weird for her, because she either doesn't know that it's an 'elfy thing' or nobody taught her how to react to those. It's pretty apparent in this banter (direct quote):
Sera: (shivers) Weird.
Solas: Sera? What are you feeling?
Sera: Ugh, here we go. It’s nothing, it just feels like I've seen this. Exactly this. It happens.
Solas: Not to everyone.
(If Inquisitor is an elf)
Sera: It’s not an elf thing. Inquisitor's not shaking.
(Otherwise)
Sera: It’s not an elf thing. You’re not shaking.
Neither Solas, nor elf Inquistor make a big deal out of it, because - in all likelihood - for them this is a thing they're familiar with and one they either know how to cope with or ignore, since they've been raised in a community to which it was also a familiar thing. So, for any other elf is likely just a part of life - and since they usually stick to their own, most may not even be aware that something they do is unique to themselves or worth mentioning. They live in their own, 'elfy bubble', so to speak.
It's like... it would be weird for an elf or human raised around dwarves to say that they have dreams since dwarves have no idea how is it to dream - yet among elves and humans dreaming is just part of life, therefore they don't go around being all "Uh, WEIRD!" every time it happens to them.
Also - it's a bold statement to claim that Sera has stronger connection than any other city elf, considering that there's no other city elf we spend equal time around.
There's also a tidbit in DAI that flies in the face of such assessment - easily missed, but already caught by fans, namely: after events in Temple of Mythal, if you go to Val Royeaux, you can find an elven servant there, talking about a woman calling herself Mythal in his dreams, which makes him wake up screaming every night.
And that's just a random city elf we know nothing about.
Like I said - it's more reasonable to asses that Bioware writers made Sera "special" only in a sense, that through her they've shown that elves are indeed special - even those who fervently deny any connection with their heritage, which only makes elven gifts or uniqueness of them stick out even more than they usually do.
If you look at it that way, it's actually pretty goddamn ingenious. There's no need to make it a giant (and totally unnecessary) plot twist to be meaningful to the story.
People throughout the game ask you what's going to happen to the Inquisition after this is over. Why? Because it's a big deal in Thedas. It's suppose to make you think. Extrapolate from the data and make you think beyond the established guideline. Hell, you can still play after Corypheus is dead.
What's in the cannon? Nothing. BioWare lets you use your mind and think.
That's a wrong way to look at things. Dragon Age is an interactive story - that is, a story in which we can decide some elements of it.
It's however, not a story that depends ENTIRELY on ourselves or our decisions. Therefore there are parts of it on which BW has no official canon on, and on some parts they do.
Therefore WHO Inquisitor is (gender, background, love life, attitude, competence, etc) is canon only to ourselves - same with decisions like, say, who becomes Divine or who stays in the Fade after Adamant. But the fact that there's Inquisitor and Inquisition, that Flemeth is Mythal or Solas is Fen'Harel - yes, that's official canon, and it's definitely not nothing.
It's conjecture, speculation, and flat out guessing. Even if you laut or poo-poo an idea, don't you want to be right when the next expansion comes out? Well, I guess I'd like to be right, but I'd like a nice Aristotelean reversal where we all sit and stare at the thing and go...why didn't I see that coming? You know, like Revan in KOTOR.
.... Why bring Revan in KOTOR, when Solas revealed to be Dread Wolf exploded quite a few heads? But how many things pointed towards such reveal? A ton, in retrospect.
(even I - a complete newbie to Dragonage back when I began DAI was like "Hmmm... wolves, wolves, wolves... why is this game throwing so many WOLVES at me? They're EVERYWHERE! ....Important, huh? Wait, why is Solas wearing this ugly piece of blackened bone around his neck? Sticks out like sore thumb on his nerdy, beige sweater... wait, is that a WOLF jawbone?")
Not that many things point towards Sera being Andruil though, as it was already pointed out.
In fact - we have more pointers suggesting that the Inquisitor might be more special (even if unaware of it) than a random Joe who stumbled upon a special magic ritual... yet I don't see many people wonder about that?