Is there a dent on my legacy because I cheated my way to a max manifest(aka 4 rings)?
About my max manifest.
#1
Guest_DeckardWasADrunk_*
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:08
Guest_DeckardWasADrunk_*
- smeckie aime ceci
#2
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:13
Legacy of throwing hand eggs, lol.
#3
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:14
#4
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:22
Funny how this guy ended up being the greatest QB ever
- FasterThanFTL et nat in the hat aiment ceci
#5
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:23
- q5tyhj et nat in the hat aiment ceci
#6
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:27
Funny how this guy ended up being the greatest QB ever
Spoiler
Crossroads Demon.
#7
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:29
#8
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:30
#9
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:31
Go Blue!!!
Yeah the giants beat the pats twice in SBs
- path0geN7 aime ceci
#10
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:33
And he still has 2 more ring than Eli.Yeah the giants beat the pats twice in SBs
#11
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:33
#12
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:34
- path0geN7 aime ceci
#13
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:36
#14
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:36
That's what I said, must have been a glitch or somethingTwo more
#15
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:44
Lol, more like-

and

#16
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:46
Ahhhhh, yes. Let the butthurt flow through you all.
#17
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 03:50
Nah, if it weren't for Brady there'd be a shortage of whiny, weak, pampered and prissy QB's to make fun of. His patented hissy fit to the refs after a defender so much as looks at him is priceless- stay classy Tommy.
#18
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:06
I am the greatest ever
![]()
#19
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:18
Montana is the closest to me and I just showed you the stats. Who would you say even compares to me?
In stats? I thought you were talking about greatest QB, not best stats? In any case, I suppose I can grant that Tom Brady may be in the conversation of next best QB after Montana.
#20
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:21
Though it'd be interesting to see what the stats of some of the all-time greats look like if adjusted for the (universally upward) trends in comp %, yards and td's that has accompanied all the rule changes. I have a sneaking suspicion that the stats of guys like Montana and Marino would look absolutely ridiculous in today's NFL, and would put the likes of Tom Brady and Peyton Manning to shame.
#21
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:32
Manning and Montana had all time great wide receivers. What do I got?
An all time great coach? A bunch of elite defenses and future HoF defensive players? Yeah, NE has clearly been hard up for talent in Brady's tenure- that's a good one.
#22
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:34
Although I like how you mention Edelman, but not Welker, Moss or Gronk (sort of like how your stats conveniently left out Montana's far superior win/loss, TD/INT ratio, and passer rating in Super Bowls- far from irrelevant stats, even if they're inconvenient for the Brady fanboy).
#23
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:37
(with some help from the NFL rules committee as well, of course- in any case, a lack of talent in NE during Brady's tenure is clearly not a serious complaint)
#24
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:40
You talking about footballs?
Um, no, this-
Though it'd be interesting to see what the stats of some of the all-time greats look like if adjusted for the (universally upward) trends in comp %, yards and td's that has accompanied all the rule changes. I have a sneaking suspicion that the stats of guys like Montana and Marino would look absolutely ridiculous in today's NFL, and would put the likes of Tom Brady and Peyton Manning to shame.
#25
Posté 06 mai 2015 - 04:41
Everyone knows QBs win trophies. Who was the best D this year? Seattle? Who beat them?
A defensive player- good point, but I thought you were arguing against me? ![]()





Retour en haut








